DoD's $41M Commercial Building Construction Contract Awarded to URS Group, Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $41,071,593 ($41.1M)
Contractor: URS Group, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-09-16
End Date: 2013-09-29
Contract Duration: 1,109 days
Daily Burn Rate: $37.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 20
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: MIGRATED DATA VALUE UNKNOWN
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $41.1 million to URS GROUP, INC. for work described as: MIGRATED DATA VALUE UNKNOWN Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at over $41 million. 2. URS Group, Inc. secured this award, indicating a competitive landscape. 3. The 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' sector is a significant area of government spending. 4. The fixed fee structure suggests a defined scope and profit margin.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order under a larger contract, making direct price comparisons difficult. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure implies that costs were expected to be managed within a defined fee, but the final price could fluctuate based on actual expenses.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition,' suggesting multiple bidders participated. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The specific price discovery mechanism within this competition isn't detailed.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure competitive pricing. However, the CPFF structure requires careful oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable.
Public Impact
Construction projects can have long-term impacts on infrastructure and local economies. The Department of Defense's spending in construction reflects its need for facilities and operational bases. Transparency in bidding processes for large construction contracts is crucial for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Unknown data for 'MIGRATED DATA VALUE'
- Specific performance metrics are not provided.
- Details on the fixed fee percentage are absent.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Contract duration of over 1000 days indicates a significant project.
- The agency is the Department of Defense, a major federal spender.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a broad category encompassing various types of construction services. Federal spending in this sector is often driven by infrastructure needs, base development, and facility upgrades.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order, suggesting it was part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. Oversight would focus on the management of individual delivery orders and the overall performance of the prime contractor.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed cost and performance data.
- CPFF contracts can pose risks if not closely monitored.
- Potential for cost overruns if scope management is weak.
- Unknown small business participation.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $41.1 million to URS GROUP, INC.. MIGRATED DATA VALUE UNKNOWN
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS GROUP, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $41.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-09-16. End: 2013-09-29.
What was the final cost compared to the initial estimate, and how did the fixed fee impact the contractor's profit?
The provided data does not include the final cost or initial estimates, making it impossible to assess cost growth. The fixed fee structure implies a predetermined profit amount, but its reasonableness relative to the work performed and market rates would require further investigation into the contract's specific terms and the contractor's actual costs.
Were there any performance issues or disputes during the contract's execution, and how were they resolved?
The available data does not contain information regarding contract performance, disputes, or their resolutions. A comprehensive risk assessment would require reviewing contract performance reports, any issued cure notices or show cause letters, and records of contractor claims or litigation.
How does the per-unit cost of this construction project compare to similar projects awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies?
Without specific details on the scope of work and unit metrics (e.g., cost per square foot, cost per building type), a direct per-unit cost comparison is not feasible. Benchmarking would require access to detailed cost breakdowns and data from comparable construction contracts within the federal government.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 20
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)
Address: 200 ORCHARD RIDGE DRIVE, S, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20878
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $41,071,593
Exercised Options: $41,071,593
Current Obligation: $41,071,593
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA890306D8520
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-09-16
Current End Date: 2013-09-29
Potential End Date: 2013-09-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-09-28
More Contracts from URS Group, Inc.
- Construction of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex, Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, Hawaii — $140.7M (Department of Defense)
- Fixed Price Award FEE Construction - Gmac — $128.0M (Department of Defense)
- Metc Buildings 1 and 2, FT. SAM Houston Texas — $104.8M (Department of Defense)
- Hurricane Michael Repairs Phase 1 — $69.2M (Department of Defense)
- Disposal of Hazardous Waste for Mnc-I Forward Operating Base Support, Iraq — $52.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)