HHS awards $19.8M for logistics consulting, highlighting fixed-price contract and competitive delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,800,279 ($19.8M)

Contractor: PAE Applied Technologies LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2003-06-15

End Date: 2008-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,812 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.9K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 51

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20201, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $19.8 million to PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC for process, physical distribution, and logistics consulting. 2. Fixed-price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government. 3. Competitive delivery order indicates a degree of market competition. 4. Spending occurred over a 5-year period, averaging approximately $3.96M annually. 5. The contract was awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's fixed-price nature is generally favorable for cost control. However, without specific performance metrics or benchmarks for 'Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services,' a precise value assessment is difficult. The award amount of $19.8M over five years suggests a moderate annual spend.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

This was a competitive delivery order, suggesting multiple vendors were considered. The competitive nature likely contributed to price discovery, though the specific mechanism and number of bids are not detailed. The fixed-price structure further aids in price certainty.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process and fixed-price contract type are generally beneficial for taxpayers, aiming to secure services at a reasonable cost through market forces.

Public Impact

Impacts HHS's operational efficiency through improved logistics and distribution processes. Supports the agency's administrative functions by optimizing resource management. Potential for improved service delivery within the healthcare sector due to better supply chain management. The long duration (5 years) suggests a sustained need for these consulting services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of specific performance metrics for value assessment.
  • Limited insight into the competitive bidding process details.
  • Consulting services can be subjective in measuring direct impact.

Positive Signals

  • Fixed-price contract type offers cost predictability.
  • Competitive award process suggests market engagement.
  • Long-term award indicates sustained agency need and potential for relationship building.

Sector Analysis

The IT and professional services sector sees significant government spending on consulting. Benchmarks for logistics consulting vary widely based on scope and duration, but $19.8M over five years for a federal agency is a substantial award, indicating a significant operational requirement.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication from the provided data whether small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration. Standard government procurement oversight processes would apply, including contract administration and performance monitoring, though specific oversight details are not provided.

Related Government Programs

  • Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services
  • Department of Health and Human Services Contracting
  • Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of detailed performance metrics.
  • Limited transparency on the competitive bidding specifics.
  • Potential for scope creep in long-term consulting contracts.
  • Subjectivity in measuring the impact of consulting services.

Tags

process-physical-distribution-and-logist, department-of-health-and-human-services, dc, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $19.8 million to PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-06-15. End: 2008-05-31.

What specific improvements or efficiencies were realized as a result of the $19.8M logistics consulting contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific outcomes or performance metrics achieved by PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC. To assess the value, one would need to review post-award performance reports, agency testimonials, or documented efficiency gains in HHS's process, physical distribution, and logistics operations. Without this, the realized value remains qualitative.

How did the competitive delivery order process ensure the best possible price for these specialized consulting services?

A competitive delivery order implies that multiple vendors were solicited, allowing for price comparison and negotiation. The fixed-price structure further locks in costs. However, the 'best' price is relative; without knowing the number of bids, the bid spread, or the specific evaluation criteria used, it's difficult to definitively state how effectively the competition drove down costs beyond the general benefit of a competitive process.

Given the 5-year duration, what mechanisms were in place to ensure the consulting services remained relevant and effective throughout the contract period?

Long-term contracts typically include provisions for contract modifications, performance reviews, and potential re-negotiations to adapt to changing agency needs or market conditions. The effectiveness would depend on the HHS's contract management practices, including regular check-ins, performance evaluations, and the ability to adjust the scope or approach as required to maintain relevance and achieve desired outcomes.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesProcess, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Offers Received: 51

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 1 RIDGMAR CTR 6500 W FR, FORT WORTH, TX, 76116

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $57,858,768

Exercised Options: $76,156,777

Current Obligation: $19,800,279

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0068M

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-06-15

Current End Date: 2008-05-31

Potential End Date: 2008-05-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-04-18

More Contracts from PAE Applied Technologies LLC

View all PAE Applied Technologies LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending