DoD awards Boeing $90.8M for aircraft parts, contract established in 2009

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $90,851,571 ($90.9M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-10-30

End Date: 2011-12-31

Contract Duration: 792 days

Daily Burn Rate: $114.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS MOD IS TO ESTABLISH CLIN 3002 AND TO ESTABLISH AND FUND CLINS 3002AA AND 3002AB.

Place of Performance

Location: WICHITA, SEDGWICK County, KANSAS, 67210, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $90.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS MOD IS TO ESTABLISH CLIN 3002 AND TO ESTABLISH AND FUND CLINS 3002AA AND 3002AB. Key points: 1. Significant award to a major defense contractor. 2. Contract established over a decade ago, potentially impacting current pricing. 3. Lack of competition raises concerns about price discovery. 4. Spending falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts' manufacturing sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost No Fee, which offers less incentive for cost control compared to fixed-price contracts. The total award amount is substantial, but without a clear baseline or comparison, assessing value is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This lack of competition can lead to higher prices as there is no market pressure to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition may have resulted in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these aircraft parts.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have overpaid due to a lack of competitive bidding. Long-standing contract (established 2009) may not reflect current market conditions. Reliance on a single large contractor for critical aircraft parts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Award to established defense contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on defense needs and technological advancements. Benchmarks are difficult without specific part comparisons.

Small Business Impact

The awardee is The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific contract data.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was established in 2009 and awarded as 'Not Competed'. Oversight would focus on ensuring costs are reasonable under the Cost No Fee structure and that the necessity for sole-source procurement remains justified.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Aging contract data
  • Limited transparency on justification

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ks, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $90.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MOD IS TO ESTABLISH CLIN 3002 AND TO ESTABLISH AND FUND CLINS 3002AA AND 3002AB.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $90.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-10-30. End: 2011-12-31.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and has it been re-evaluated over its lifespan?

The provided data does not specify the justification for the sole-source award. Typically, such awards are made when only one source can meet the requirement, or for urgent needs. Without re-evaluation details, it's unclear if the necessity for sole-sourcing was periodically assessed, which is crucial for ensuring fair pricing and avoiding vendor lock-in.

How does the unit cost of the parts procured under this contract compare to similar parts acquired through competitive means?

A direct comparison of unit costs is not possible with the given data. The contract type (Cost No Fee) and the lack of competition make it difficult to establish a reliable benchmark. A thorough analysis would require access to pricing data for comparable parts acquired competitively by the DoD or other agencies.

What is the current operational status and necessity of the aircraft parts being procured under this long-standing contract?

The data indicates the contract was active from 2009 to 2011. Its current operational relevance depends on the specific aircraft platforms it supports. If these parts are for legacy systems, their necessity might be diminishing. If they are for ongoing operations, the long duration without competition warrants scrutiny regarding continued justification and potential for future competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4615 SOUTH OLIVER, WICHITA, KS, 67210

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $90,851,571

Exercised Options: $90,851,571

Current Obligation: $90,851,571

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA810606D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-10-30

Current End Date: 2011-12-31

Potential End Date: 2011-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-02-17

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending