Navy awards $12.6M contract for building construction, highlighting a competitive procurement process

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,622,484 ($12.6M)

Contractor: Barclay White\coakley Construction

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-09-30

End Date: 2005-06-17

Contract Duration: 626 days

Daily Burn Rate: $20.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200312!197373!1700!C2477 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COM!N6247799D0117 !A!N! !N!0025 !20030930!20050617!026205562!026205562!026205562!N!BARCLAY WHITE COAKLEY CONSTRUC!16 SOUTH SUMMIT AVENUE, SU!GAITHERSBURG !MD!20877!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000005488000!N!N!000000000000!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !236220!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!005!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !B!B!A!A!000!A!D!Y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20374

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.6 million to BARCLAY WHITE\COAKLEY CONSTRUCTION for work described as: 200312!197373!1700!C2477 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COM!N6247799D0117 !A!N! !N!0025 !20030930!20050617!026205562!026205562!026205562!N!BARCLAY WHITE COAKLEY CONSTRUC!16 SOUTH SUMMIT AVENUE, SU!GAITHERSBURG !MD!20877!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTR… Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding environment. 2. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts performance risk to the contractor. 3. The contract duration of approximately 2 years indicates a medium-term project. 4. The award value of $12.6 million falls within a typical range for construction projects of this nature. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, a major federal agency with significant construction needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $12.6 million for building construction appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government when managed effectively. Without specific details on the scope of work, a direct comparison to market rates for similar construction services is challenging, but the award value is not immediately indicative of overpricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 5 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this construction project. A competitive bidding process generally leads to better price discovery and can result in more favorable terms for the government. The number of bidders is a positive sign for ensuring that the government receives a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs. Multiple bidders mean the government can select the most cost-effective solution while maintaining quality standards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of the Navy and its personnel, who will gain access to improved or new facilities. The services delivered involve the construction of commercial and institutional buildings, which could include administrative offices, barracks, or specialized facilities. The geographic impact is centered in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, supporting federal infrastructure in the nation's capital. The contract supports the construction workforce, including skilled trades, project managers, and support staff, contributing to local employment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the initial project requirements are not clearly defined.
Risk of construction delays due to unforeseen site conditions or weather.
Ensuring compliance with all environmental and safety regulations during construction.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract structure limits cost uncertainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market and potentially better pricing.
The contractor has a track record, implying some level of established capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction (NAICS 236220). This sector is characterized by a mix of large general contractors and numerous smaller specialized firms. Federal spending in construction is substantial, supporting infrastructure development, facility maintenance, and modernization across various agencies. The market size for federal construction is significant, driven by the government's vast real estate portfolio and ongoing modernization efforts. This contract represents a typical procurement for facility upgrades or new construction within the Department of the Navy's operational footprint.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. The presence of 5 bidders suggests that both large and potentially small businesses could have participated, but without specific set-aside provisions, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not guaranteed. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if the prime contractor has a history of engaging small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified construction services within the agreed-upon price and schedule. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed project progress reports may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Federal Building Construction
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Contracts
Department of Defense Construction Projects
General Services Administration (GSA) Building Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Scope Definition
Performance Risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.6 million to BARCLAY WHITE\COAKLEY CONSTRUCTION. 200312!197373!1700!C2477 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COM!N6247799D0117 !A!N! !N!0025 !20030930!20050617!026205562!026205562!026205562!N!BARCLAY WHITE COAKLEY CONSTRUC!16 SOUTH SUMMIT AVENUE, SU!GAITHERSBURG !MD!20877!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000005488000!N!N!000000000000!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !236220!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BARCLAY WHITE\COAKLEY CONSTRUCTION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-09-30. End: 2005-06-17.

What is the specific type and scope of the building construction awarded under this contract?

The contract data identifies the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code as 236220, which corresponds to 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.' This broad category encompasses the construction of non-residential buildings such as office buildings, warehouses, and other commercial structures. However, the specific details regarding the exact type of building (e.g., administrative facility, barracks, research lab) and its scope (e.g., new construction, renovation, expansion) are not explicitly provided in the abbreviated data. Further investigation into the contract's statement of work would be necessary to ascertain the precise nature and scale of the construction project undertaken by Barclay White Coakley Construction.

How does the awarded value of $12.6 million compare to similar building construction contracts by the Department of the Navy?

The awarded value of $12.6 million for building construction is a moderate sum within the context of federal contracting. The Department of the Navy, responsible for extensive infrastructure, awards contracts ranging from minor repairs to multi-billion dollar construction projects. To benchmark this specific award, one would need to compare it against contracts for similar types of buildings (e.g., administrative, industrial) and similar scopes of work (new construction vs. renovation) awarded around the same period (2003-2005) by the Navy or other Department of Defense components. Without access to a detailed database of comparable projects with specific scope details, it's difficult to definitively state if $12.6 million represents a particularly high or low value. However, it falls within a plausible range for a significant construction project.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly list the key performance indicators (KPIs) or specific deliverables for this contract. However, as a construction contract, the primary deliverable is the completed building or facility according to the specifications outlined in the contract's statement of work. Key performance indicators would typically revolve around adherence to the construction schedule, meeting quality standards and building codes, maintaining a safe work environment, and completing the project within the agreed-upon budget. The firm fixed-price nature implies that meeting these deliverables within the set price is paramount for the contractor's profitability. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring progress and ensuring compliance with these implicit KPIs.

What is the track record of Barclay White Coakley Construction with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of the Navy?

The abbreviated data indicates that Barclay White Coakley Construction was awarded this contract. To assess their track record, a comprehensive review of their past federal contract history would be required. This would involve examining databases like SAM.gov (System for Award Management) or FPDS (Federal Procurement Data System) for previous awards, contract performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or terminations. Without this detailed historical data, it's impossible to provide a specific assessment of their track record. However, being awarded a contract of this value suggests they met the basic eligibility and capability requirements at the time of award.

What are the potential risks associated with this type of construction contract, and how might they be mitigated?

Construction contracts inherently carry risks such as unforeseen site conditions (e.g., soil issues, hazardous materials), weather delays, labor shortages, material price fluctuations, and design errors or omissions. For this specific contract, awarded as 'Firm Fixed Price,' the primary risk to the government is ensuring the contractor delivers the project as specified. Mitigation strategies typically include thorough pre-bid site investigations, detailed and clear contract specifications, robust project management and oversight by the government (COR), contingency planning for schedule and budget, and requiring performance bonds from the contractor. The full and open competition also helps mitigate risk by selecting a contractor likely capable of managing these challenges effectively.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 16 SOUTH SUMMIT AVENUE, SU, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6247799D0117

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline