DoD awards Boeing $81.5M for Other Aircraft Parts, citing 'Not Competed' award

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $81,486,589 ($81.5M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-10-31

End Date: 2010-12-31

Contract Duration: 791 days

Daily Burn Rate: $103.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FUNDING MOD.

Place of Performance

Location: WICHITA, SEDGWICK County, KANSAS, 67210, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $81.5 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: FUNDING MOD. Key points: 1. Significant award to a major defense contractor, The Boeing Company. 2. Focus on aircraft parts manufacturing, a critical defense sector. 3. Award method raises questions about competition and potential price discovery. 4. Long contract duration (791 days) suggests a substantial project.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The award value of $81.5M for aircraft parts is substantial. Without specific unit details or comparison data, it's difficult to assess value for money. The 'Cost No Fee' contract type suggests the government bears the cost risk.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was 'NOT COMPETED,' indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This method bypasses competitive bidding, potentially leading to higher prices and reduced innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these aircraft parts.

Public Impact

Ensures supply of critical aircraft parts for defense operations. Supports a major aerospace manufacturer and its supply chain. Potential for increased costs due to non-competitive award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Cost-plus contract type (Cost No Fee)
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Award to established prime contractor
  • Supports critical defense needs

Sector Analysis

This award falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector, a key component of the aerospace and defense industry. Spending in this area is vital for maintaining military readiness.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this award went to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status warrants scrutiny. Further oversight is needed to understand the justification for bypassing competition and to ensure fair pricing and accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Lack of transparency in justification
  • Potential for inflated costs

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ks, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $81.5 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. FUNDING MOD.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $81.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-10-31. End: 2010-12-31.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or the unavailability of other sources. Without further documentation, it's impossible to determine the precise reason. However, such awards necessitate rigorous justification to ensure taxpayer funds are used appropriately and that competition is only bypassed when absolutely necessary.

How does the 'Cost No Fee' contract type impact the government's risk and potential for cost overruns?

A 'Cost No Fee' contract means the government reimburses the contractor for all allowable costs but does not pay any profit or fee. This shifts the financial risk heavily onto the government, as the contractor has less incentive to control costs. It is often used when the scope of work is uncertain or when the contractor has minimal control over costs.

What is the benchmark pricing for similar aircraft parts contracts awarded competitively?

Benchmarking pricing for 'Other Aircraft Parts' is complex due to the vast range of components and specifications. Competitive contracts for similar, high-volume parts might yield lower per-unit costs. However, specialized or low-volume parts, especially those requiring specific certifications or proprietary technology, can command higher prices even in competitive bids.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4615 SOUTH OLIVER, WICHITA, KS, 67210

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $117,678,589

Exercised Options: $117,678,589

Current Obligation: $81,486,589

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA810606D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-10-31

Current End Date: 2010-12-31

Potential End Date: 2010-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-02-17

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending