DoD awards $33.6M contract for engineering services to Lockheed Martin, raising competition concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,596,705 ($33.6M)

Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-10-01

End Date: 2008-09-30

Contract Duration: 730 days

Daily Burn Rate: $46.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: SPARES OTHER (3400G) (CR)

Place of Performance

Location: GOODYEAR, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85338

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $33.6 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: SPARES OTHER (3400G) (CR) Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $33.6 million for engineering services. 2. Sole-source award to Lockheed Martin limits competitive pricing. 3. Long contract duration of 730 days may indicate potential for cost overruns. 4. The 'SPARES OTHER' designation suggests a need for specialized support.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's 'COST NO FEE' pricing structure, combined with a lack of competition, makes a direct pricing assessment difficult. Benchmarking against similar sole-source engineering service contracts is challenging due to the unique nature of 'SPARES OTHER'.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of competitive bidding. This significantly limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for a $33.6 million contract likely results in a higher taxpayer burden than if multiple bids were solicited.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for engineering services due to the lack of competition. The long-term nature of the contract could lock the DoD into a potentially suboptimal solution. Dependence on a single contractor for critical spares support poses a risk to Air Force readiness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Engineering services are crucial for defense operations, encompassing design, development, and maintenance. The benchmark for such services varies widely based on complexity and duration, but competitive bidding typically ensures better value.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded to Lockheed Martin Corporation, a large prime contractor. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure the Department of Defense received fair pricing and that competition was appropriately waived. Further review of the justification for sole-source procurement is recommended.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, az, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $33.6 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. SPARES OTHER (3400G) (CR)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-10-01. End: 2008-09-30.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of market availability. Without specific documentation, it's impossible to confirm if alternative competitive strategies were explored. However, the absence of competition for a contract of this magnitude raises questions about whether a more open bidding process could have yielded better value and innovation for the Department of Defense.

How does the 'COST NO FEE' pricing structure impact the government's ability to control costs and ensure contractor efficiency?

A 'COST NO FEE' contract means the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs but receives no fee or profit. This structure can incentivize cost control by the contractor, as any savings directly benefit them. However, it can also reduce transparency and make it harder for the government to benchmark performance or identify inefficiencies, especially when combined with a sole-source award.

What is the long-term strategic implication of awarding a significant spares support contract solely to one large corporation?

Solely awarding significant spares support to one large corporation can create vendor lock-in and reduce the government's flexibility. It may also stifle innovation from smaller, specialized firms. While it can ensure a single point of contact and potentially streamline logistics, it also concentrates risk and limits competitive pressure on pricing and service quality over the contract's lifecycle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)

Address: 1300 SOUTH LITCHFIELD ROAD, GOODYEAR, AZ, 09

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $33,596,705

Exercised Options: $33,596,705

Current Obligation: $33,596,705

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F0960403D0026

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-10-01

Current End Date: 2008-09-30

Potential End Date: 2008-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-07-06

More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation

View all Lockheed Martin Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending