DoD's $23.4M engineering services contract with Amentum Technology, Inc. awarded under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,434,472 ($23.4M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-10-01
End Date: 2007-02-28
Contract Duration: 150 days
Daily Burn Rate: $156.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: FUNDING IN SUPPORT OF CLIN 0005
Place of Performance
Location: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21005
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.4 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: FUNDING IN SUPPORT OF CLIN 0005 Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering services, indicating a need for specialized technical expertise. 2. The contract was competed fully and openly, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Amentum Technology, Inc. is the sole awardee, highlighting their success in the competitive landscape. 4. The contract duration of 150 days suggests a focused, short-term project or task. 5. Awarded under the 'Engineering Services' NAICS code (541330), aligning with specialized technical support. 6. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can offer flexibility but requires careful cost management. 7. The contract was awarded in October 2006, with a completion date in February 2007.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more detailed service descriptions and performance metrics. The total award amount of $23.4 million over approximately 5 months suggests a significant daily expenditure. However, without comparable contracts for similar engineering services within the Department of Defense or across government agencies, it's difficult to definitively assess if this represents excellent or questionable value. The Time and Materials pricing structure, while flexible, can sometimes lead to higher costs if not closely managed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data shows 5 bids were received, suggesting a reasonable level of competition for this engineering services requirement. A competitive process like this generally helps ensure that the government receives fair pricing and that the most capable contractor is selected.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and encouraging a wider pool of contractors to offer their best value propositions.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of Defense, which receives essential engineering services. The services delivered are related to engineering, likely supporting military operations or infrastructure. The geographic impact is centered around the Department of the Army's operations, potentially within Maryland where the contract was awarded. Workforce implications include the employment of engineers and technical staff by Amentum Technology, Inc.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
- Limited contract duration may indicate a need for follow-on work or potential disruption if not properly planned.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the quality and effectiveness of the engineering services provided.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust and fair selection process.
- Received multiple bids (5), indicating market interest and a competitive environment.
- Contractor Amentum Technology, Inc. was selected, implying they met the technical and cost requirements.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector is characterized by specialized expertise and often supports government defense and infrastructure projects. The market for engineering services is competitive, with numerous firms offering a wide range of capabilities. Government spending in this area is substantial, reflecting the ongoing need for technical support in areas like defense, aerospace, and civil engineering.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The competition was open to all responsible sources, which could include small businesses if they met the qualifications, but no specific allocation was made.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the Time and Materials contract, including adherence to labor rates and direct costs. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Engineering Services
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- Department of the Army Contracts
- Time and Materials Contracts
Risk Flags
- Time and Materials contract type requires close monitoring to control costs.
- Limited contract duration may indicate a need for follow-on actions or potential gaps in service.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes objective assessment of value difficult.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, engineering-services, full-and-open-competition, time-and-materials, amentum-technology-inc, naics-541330, maryland, large-contract, professional-scientific-and-technical-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.4 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. FUNDING IN SUPPORT OF CLIN 0005
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-10-01. End: 2007-02-28.
What was the specific nature of the engineering services provided under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Engineering Services' under NAICS code 541330. However, the specific nature of these services is not detailed. Typically, engineering services for the Department of Defense can encompass a wide range of activities, including but not limited to: design and development of military systems, infrastructure planning and design, technical consulting, systems integration, testing and evaluation, and project management for defense-related projects. Without further documentation, the precise tasks performed remain unspecified.
How does the $23.4 million award compare to typical spending on similar engineering services by the Department of the Army?
Comparing this $23.4 million award to typical spending requires access to historical contract data for similar engineering services procured by the Department of the Army. While $23.4 million is a substantial sum, the Department of the Army procures a vast array of services. The significance of this amount depends on whether it represents a single large project, a series of tasks over the contract period, or a broader support contract. Benchmarking would involve analyzing the average award value, contract duration, and scope of work for comparable engineering service contracts within the Army's portfolio over similar timeframes.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Amentum Technology, Inc.'s performance?
The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Amentum Technology, Inc.'s performance under this contract. For Time and Materials contracts, performance is often assessed based on the timely completion of tasks, adherence to agreed-upon labor rates and direct costs, and the quality of deliverables as defined in the contract's statement of work. However, without access to the contract's performance clauses or post-award evaluations, a detailed assessment of performance metrics is not possible.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense for engineering services?
Amentum Technology, Inc. (and its predecessor entities) has a significant history of contracting with the Department of Defense for various services, including engineering. While this specific contract was awarded in 2006, the company has continued to secure numerous DoD contracts over the years. Their track record generally involves providing a broad spectrum of technical, engineering, and support services across different military branches. A comprehensive review would require examining their complete contract history, including past performance evaluations and any documented issues or successes.
Were there any significant risks identified during the procurement or performance of this contract?
The provided data does not explicitly detail any significant risks identified during the procurement or performance of this contract. However, general risks associated with Time and Materials contracts include potential cost overruns if not managed diligently, scope creep, and ensuring the contractor's personnel are efficiently utilized. For engineering services, risks could also involve technical challenges, schedule delays, or ensuring the quality and suitability of the engineering solutions provided. The fact that it was competed suggests that potential bidders assessed and accepted these risks.
How has federal spending on engineering services (NAICS 541330) evolved since this contract was awarded in 2006?
Federal spending on engineering services (NAICS 541330) has generally seen fluctuations but has remained a significant category of government expenditure since 2006. The Department of Defense is consistently one of the largest purchasers of these services, driven by modernization efforts, infrastructure needs, and ongoing operational support. Factors influencing spending include geopolitical events, budget appropriations, and the specific technological requirements of various defense programs. Analyzing trends would involve examining annual federal procurement data to identify growth or contraction in this sector.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc (UEI: 074103508)
Address: 600 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 04
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,318,061
Exercised Options: $24,318,061
Current Obligation: $23,434,472
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DAAD0501D0019
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-10-01
Current End Date: 2007-02-28
Potential End Date: 2007-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-02-10
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)