DoD Awards $23.4M for Exterior Power Plant Construction to Ribeiro Construction Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,394,993 ($23.4M)
Contractor: Ribeiro Construction Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-07
End Date: 2010-02-16
Contract Duration: 1,258 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: EXTERIOR POWER PLANT
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.4 million to RIBEIRO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for work described as: EXTERIOR POWER PLANT Key points: 1. The contract value of $23.4 million is significant for a single construction project. 2. Ribeiro Construction Company secured this award, indicating potential specialization or competitive strength. 3. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. 4. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust price discovery process.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $23.4 million for a power plant construction project appears within a reasonable range for large-scale infrastructure. However, without specific project scope details and comparable project data, a precise valuation is difficult. The award amount is noted.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Full and open competition was employed, which typically leads to competitive pricing and a wider pool of qualified bidders. This method aims to ensure the government receives the best value through market forces.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it promotes efficiency and cost-effectiveness in government spending.
Public Impact
Impacts military base infrastructure and operational capabilities. Supports the construction sector and employment opportunities. Ensures reliable power supply for critical defense facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics for Ribeiro Construction Company.
- Potential for cost overruns in large-scale construction projects.
- Dependence on a single contractor for project completion.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Project addresses critical infrastructure needs.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, which is a significant area of government spending. Benchmarks for similar large-scale power plant construction projects would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that Ribeiro Construction Company, the awardee, is not explicitly identified as a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was a factor or if subcontracting opportunities were provided.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense and Washington Headquarters Services are responsible for oversight. The firm fixed price contract structure provides a degree of accountability for cost control, but performance monitoring is crucial.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Washington Headquarters Services Programs
Risk Flags
- Large contract value for a single construction project.
- Firm fixed-price contract for a long-duration project.
- Potential for cost overruns due to project complexity.
- Lack of detailed project scope for value assessment.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.4 million to RIBEIRO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. EXTERIOR POWER PLANT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RIBEIRO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-07. End: 2010-02-16.
What is the specific scope of work for the exterior power plant, and how does the $23.4 million award compare to similar projects in terms of cost per square foot or capacity?
The provided data lacks specific details on the power plant's scope, capacity, or square footage. To assess value, a comparison with similar DoD or civilian power plant construction contracts, considering factors like technology, output, and location, would be necessary. The $23.4 million award is a significant sum, but its appropriateness hinges on these unstated project specifics.
What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for a project of this magnitude and duration, particularly concerning unforeseen site conditions or material price fluctuations
A firm fixed-price contract for a large, long-duration construction project like a power plant carries risks of cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions or significant material price escalations occur. While the contractor assumes most of this risk, substantial issues could lead to claims, delays, or contractor default, impacting project completion and potentially requiring contract modifications. Robust contingency planning and oversight are vital.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure competitive pricing and identify the most capable contractor for this critical infrastructure project?
The 'full and open competition' method is designed to maximize competition, theoretically leading to the best value for the government. Its effectiveness in this case depends on the number and quality of bids received, the clarity of the solicitation, and the evaluation criteria used. Without access to bid data and the evaluation process, it's difficult to definitively assess the price discovery and contractor selection effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT OF RESTORATION ACTIVITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 7385 A OLD ALEXANDRIA FERRY RD, CLINTON, MD, 04
Business Categories: Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,394,993
Exercised Options: $23,394,993
Current Obligation: $23,394,993
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: MDA94703D0004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-07
Current End Date: 2010-02-16
Potential End Date: 2010-02-16 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-04-27
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)