DoD awards $10.3M for logistics support, with a significant portion for CCI Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,311,825 ($10.3M)

Contractor: CCI Incorporated (8111)

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2001-08-16

End Date: 2006-05-06

Contract Duration: 1,724 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200111!004133!1700!A8122 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042100D0467 !A!N!*!N!0020 !20010816!20020815!198151078!198151078!198151078!N!CCI INCORPORATED !277 SOUTH WASHINGTON ST , !ALEXANDRIA !VA!22314!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEXANDRIA (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000001218992!N!N!000000000000!R706!LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!*!*!5!B!M! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!R!2!007!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!Z! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22033

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.3 million to CCI INCORPORATED (8111) for work described as: 200111!004133!1700!A8122 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042100D0467 !A!N!*!N!0020 !20010816!20020815!198151078!198151078!198151078!N!CCI INCORPORATED !277 SOUTH WASHINGTON ST , !ALEXANDRIA !VA!22314!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEXA… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to CCI Inc. for logistics support services. 2. The contract value is substantial, indicating a significant need for these services. 3. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term requirement for ongoing support. 4. The contract type (Cost Plus Award Fee) allows for performance-based incentives. 5. The geographic location of the contractor is in Virginia. 6. The procurement method was full and open competition after exclusion of sources.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $10,311,824.58. Without specific benchmarks for logistics support services of this nature, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure implies that the final cost could vary based on performance, making a direct comparison challenging without knowing the award fee achieved. However, the contract duration of over 4 years suggests a sustained need and potentially a negotiated rate that reflects market conditions at the time of award.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources may have been excluded for reasons not detailed in the provided data. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests an effort to solicit from a wide range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: The 'full and open' competition, even with exclusions, generally aims to achieve competitive pricing by allowing multiple vendors to bid. This approach is intended to benefit taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of Defense, specifically entities requiring logistics support services. The services delivered are related to logistics, which are crucial for military operations and readiness. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the Naval Air Warfare Center and potentially other DoD installations where CCI Inc. provides support. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for individuals with logistics and support expertise, primarily in Virginia where the contractor is based.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'after exclusion of sources' clause in the competition type warrants further investigation to understand the rationale and potential impact on competition.
The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract type can lead to higher costs if not managed effectively, as it incentivizes higher spending to achieve award fees.
Lack of detailed performance metrics or award fee outcomes makes it difficult to assess the true value and effectiveness of the contractor's performance.

Positive Signals

The contract was awarded through a full and open competition, suggesting an effort to leverage market capabilities.
The Cost Plus Award Fee structure, if managed well, can incentivize high performance and efficiency from the contractor.
The contract duration indicates a stable, long-term requirement, which can lead to more predictable budgeting and operational planning for the DoD.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader defense logistics and support services sector. This sector is characterized by complex supply chains, maintenance, repair, and operational support for military equipment and personnel. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining military readiness and operational capability. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale logistics contracts awarded by the DoD to various prime contractors, considering factors like contract type, scope of services, and duration.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. Furthermore, there is no explicit mention of subcontracting plans or goals related to small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular award is not discernible from the data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the Department of Defense's contract management and oversight bodies, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). The Cost Plus Award Fee structure necessitates close monitoring of contractor performance and costs to ensure that award fees are justified and that taxpayer funds are used efficiently. Transparency regarding performance metrics and achieved award fees would be key accountability measures.

Related Government Programs

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Operations
Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Support Contracts
Military Base Operations Support
Aerospace Maintenance and Repair Services
Government Contract Logistics

Risk Flags

Competition Type Ambiguity
Potential for Cost Overruns (CPAF)
Lack of Detailed Performance Data

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.3 million to CCI INCORPORATED (8111). 200111!004133!1700!A8122 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042100D0467 !A!N!*!N!0020 !20010816!20020815!198151078!198151078!198151078!N!CCI INCORPORATED !277 SOUTH WASHINGTON ST , !ALEXANDRIA !VA!22314!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEXANDRIA (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000001218992!N!N!000000000000!R706!LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!*!*!5!B!M! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CCI INCORPORATED (8111).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-08-16. End: 2006-05-06.

What specific logistics support services were provided under this contract?

The contract description indicates 'LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES'. While the specific details are not itemized in the provided data, such services typically encompass a wide range of activities essential for military operations. This can include supply chain management, inventory control, warehousing, transportation, maintenance and repair of equipment, technical support, and potentially personnel support services. Given the award was to the Naval Air Warfare Center, it is highly probable that these services were related to aviation logistics, supporting aircraft readiness, maintenance, and operational deployment.

How does the $10.3 million award compare to similar logistics support contracts for the Navy?

Comparing this $10.3 million award requires context on the scope and duration. This contract had a duration of approximately 4 years (from August 2001 to May 2006). For a multi-year contract of this nature, $10.3 million represents an average annual value of roughly $2.5 million. This is a moderate-sized contract within the defense logistics sector. Larger, more comprehensive logistics support contracts, especially those involving extensive supply chain management or depot-level maintenance for entire fleets, can run into hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars over similar or longer periods. Smaller, more specialized support tasks might be valued in the low millions or less. Therefore, this contract appears to be a mid-range award for specific logistics support functions.

What are the key risks associated with a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract for logistics services?

The primary risk with a CPAF contract is the potential for cost overruns if not managed diligently. Because the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fee that includes a potential award based on performance, there's an incentive to incur costs to achieve higher performance targets. This necessitates robust government oversight to ensure that costs are reasonable and allocable, and that award fees are genuinely earned based on clearly defined and measurable performance standards. For logistics services, risks include inefficiencies in supply chain management, unexpected maintenance costs, or delays in delivery, all of which could drive up costs and potentially impact award fee calculations. Effective administration and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks.

What was CCI Inc.'s track record prior to or during this contract?

The provided data identifies CCI INCORPORATED as the contractor. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their performance on this specific contract (N0042100D0467) and any other contracts they held with the government around the same period. Key indicators would include past performance evaluations, any contract disputes, claims, or terminations. Without access to these specific performance records or broader contract history databases, it's impossible to definitively state CCI Inc.'s track record based solely on this award data. However, being awarded a multi-year contract by the Naval Air Warfare Center suggests they met initial qualification and potentially demonstrated adequate capability.

How did the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' impact pricing?

The phrase 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' is somewhat contradictory and requires clarification. Typically, 'Full and Open Competition' implies soliciting offers from all responsible sources and ensuring full and open competition. 'Exclusion of Sources' suggests that certain potential offerors were deliberately not solicited or considered. If the exclusion was justified (e.g., based on specific capabilities or prior performance), and a sufficient number of other qualified sources were allowed to compete, the pricing could still be competitive. However, if the exclusion significantly limited the pool of potential bidders, it could potentially lead to less competitive pricing than a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The actual impact on pricing would depend on the number of bidders that remained and the specific market dynamics for the services required.

What is the significance of the contract being a 'Delivery Order'?

The 'AW' field indicates 'DELIVERY ORDER'. This signifies that the contract N0042100D0467 was likely an Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract, a task order contract, or a basic ordering agreement. The $10.3 million represents the value of a specific order placed against that larger contract vehicle. IDIQ contracts allow agencies to order supplies or services from the contractor on an as-needed basis over a specified period. Delivery orders define the specific quantities, delivery dates, and prices for a particular shipment or service requirement under the parent contract. This structure provides flexibility for the agency to procure services as requirements arise, rather than committing to a fixed quantity upfront.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Contractor Details

Address: 3101 WILSON BLVD STE 700, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0042100D0467

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline