DoD's $80.8M Raytheon Contract for R&D Services: Fair Value Amidst Limited Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,156,082 ($20.2M)

Contractor: Hughes Training, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2001-06-04

End Date: 2004-07-25

Contract Duration: 1,147 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 200109!000151!5700!GW03 !HSW/PKR !F4162497D5000 !A!N!*!N!0020 !20010604!20040725!808514947!056546583!001339159!N!RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO!2116 ARLINGTON DOWNS ROAD !ARLINGTON !TX!76011!46000!013!04!MESA !MARICOPA !ARIZONA !+000001150000!N!N!000000000000!AD92!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-APPLIED RESEARCH !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541710!*!*!5!B!S! !*!*!*!B!*!*!B! !A !N!U!2!001!B! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, TARRANT County, TEXAS, 76011

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.2 million to HUGHES TRAINING, INC for work described as: 200109!000151!5700!GW03 !HSW/PKR !F4162497D5000 !A!N!*!N!0020 !20010604!20040725!808514947!056546583!001339159!N!RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO!2116 ARLINGTON DOWNS ROAD !ARLINGTON !TX!76011!46000!013!04!MESA !MARIC… Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Raytheon Technical Services Co. for Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences appears to be priced reasonably compared to similar contracts. 2. While the contract was awarded under full and open competition, the primary competitor listed, Hughes Training, Inc., suggests a potentially narrow field of specialized bidders. 3. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure introduces some risk of cost overruns, though the duration and value are moderate. 4. Spending in the R&D sector, particularly for defense applications, is substantial, making this contract a small but significant part of overall federal R&D investment.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of $80.85M over approximately 3 years is within a reasonable range for specialized R&D services. Benchmarking against similar DoD contracts for applied research and development in physical sciences suggests this pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were solicited. However, the presence of only one listed competitor (Hughes Training, Inc.) might suggest that the specialized nature of the R&D required limited the number of viable participants.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process, even with limited apparent participants, aims to secure fair pricing for taxpayers. The final negotiated price reflects the government's assessment of value for the specialized R&D services.

Public Impact

This contract supports advanced research and development, potentially leading to technological advancements in defense. The funding allocated contributes to the economic activity within the aerospace and defense sector, particularly in Texas. Taxpayers are funding specialized scientific and engineering services that are crucial for national security and technological superiority.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns due to Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure.
  • Limited number of apparent competitors may indicate a lack of robust price discovery.
  • Contract duration of nearly 4 years could lead to scope creep if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Contract supports critical R&D for the Department of Defense.
  • Pricing appears reasonable based on initial assessment.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Research and Development sector, specifically within 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences.' Federal spending in this area is substantial, driven by defense needs and technological innovation. Benchmarks vary widely based on the specific research area and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Raytheon Technical Services Co., a large business. There is no explicit indication of small business participation or subcontracting goals within the provided data. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, a component of the Department of Defense. Standard DoD oversight mechanisms for R&D contracts would apply, including performance monitoring and financial reviews to ensure accountability and proper use of funds.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type carries inherent risk of cost overruns.
  • Limited number of listed competitors may indicate a less competitive bidding environment.
  • Contract duration of nearly four years requires sustained oversight.
  • No explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals.

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, tx, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.2 million to HUGHES TRAINING, INC. 200109!000151!5700!GW03 !HSW/PKR !F4162497D5000 !A!N!*!N!0020 !20010604!20040725!808514947!056546583!001339159!N!RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO!2116 ARLINGTON DOWNS ROAD !ARLINGTON !TX!76011!46000!013!04!MESA !MARICOPA !ARIZONA !+000001150000!N!N!000000000000!AD92!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-APPLIED RESEARCH !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541710!*!*!5!B!S! !*!*!*!B!*!*!B!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HUGHES TRAINING, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-06-04. End: 2004-07-25.

What specific R&D advancements were achieved under this contract, and did they meet the projected value for the investment?

The provided data does not detail the specific R&D advancements or their impact. To assess the true value, a review of contract deliverables, technical reports, and subsequent utilization of the research findings would be necessary. This would determine if the $80.85M investment yielded tangible benefits aligning with the Department of Defense's strategic goals.

Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, what mechanisms were in place to mitigate cost overruns and ensure efficient resource allocation?

While the contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, the specific oversight mechanisms to mitigate cost overruns are not detailed. Typically, such contracts involve detailed cost tracking, regular audits, and performance reviews by the contracting officer. The fixed fee component provides some incentive for the contractor to control costs, but the government bears the risk of actual allowable costs exceeding estimates.

How did the limited number of apparent bidders impact the final negotiated price and the overall effectiveness of the competition?

A limited number of bidders, even in a full and open competition, can potentially lead to less aggressive pricing than a scenario with numerous qualified competitors. While the price appears reasonable, it's possible that a more robust competition could have yielded even better value. The effectiveness of the competition hinges on whether the solicitation adequately reached all potential sources and if the evaluation criteria fairly assessed the proposals received.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTDEFENSE (OTHER) R&D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: LUKE A FRCE BASE BLDG 616, GLENDALE, AZ, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F4162497D5000

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2001-06-04

Current End Date: 2004-07-25

Potential End Date: 2004-07-25 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-08-02

More Contracts from Hughes Training, Inc

View all Hughes Training, Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending