DoD Awards $13.7M Engineering Services Contract to URS Group, Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,715,176 ($13.7M)
Contractor: URS Group, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-10-06
End Date: 2014-12-31
Contract Duration: 2,277 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: DELIVERY ORDER NO. 0017
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20006
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.7 million to URS GROUP, INC. for work described as: DELIVERY ORDER NO. 0017 Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering services valued at $13.7 million. 2. Procurement utilized full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is over 6 years, indicating a long-term need. 4. No small business participation was noted in this award.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $13.7 million for engineering services over 6 years appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering contracts would provide further validation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition suggests that multiple vendors were able to bid, likely leading to a more competitive price discovery process. This method is generally preferred for maximizing value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is expected to yield fair pricing, thus optimizing taxpayer investment in engineering services.
Public Impact
Ensures critical engineering services are available for Department of the Army projects. Supports infrastructure development and maintenance through specialized engineering expertise. The long-term nature of the contract provides stability for service delivery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 60 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation may limit opportunities for smaller firms.
- Long contract duration could lead to potential cost overruns if not managed effectively.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition promotes a healthy market and potentially better pricing.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of government infrastructure and defense projects. Spending in this sector is often substantial and driven by project needs.
Small Business Impact
The award data indicates that small businesses were not involved in this specific contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to understand if this is a trend or an isolated instance.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army's procurement process, utilizing full and open competition, suggests adherence to standard oversight procedures. Monitoring contract performance and adherence to the firm fixed price will be key accountability measures.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost creep over a long contract duration.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Limited insight into specific services and performance metrics.
- No benchmark data provided for cost comparison.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.7 million to URS GROUP, INC.. DELIVERY ORDER NO. 0017
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS GROUP, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-10-06. End: 2014-12-31.
What specific engineering services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with the Army's strategic objectives?
The contract was for engineering services (NAICS 541330). While the specific services aren't detailed, they likely supported Army infrastructure, facilities, or operational needs. Alignment with strategic objectives would depend on the Army's project portfolio and modernization efforts during the 2008-2014 period.
Were there any performance issues or contract modifications during the 6-year period that impacted the final cost or delivery?
The provided data does not detail contract modifications or performance issues. A review of contract history and performance reports would be necessary to assess any deviations from the original plan and their impact on cost and delivery timelines.
How does the $13.7 million award compare to the estimated cost or budget for these engineering services?
The data does not include the estimated cost or budget for these services. To assess value, this award amount would need to be compared against the government's initial cost estimates and potentially against bids from other competitors if that information were available.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102
Solicitation ID: W912DR07R0005
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)
Address: 2020 K ST NW STE 300, WASHINGTON, DC, 20006
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,715,176
Exercised Options: $13,715,176
Current Obligation: $13,715,176
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912DR07D0022
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-10-06
Current End Date: 2014-12-31
Potential End Date: 2014-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-06-04
More Contracts from URS Group, Inc.
- Construction of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex, Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, Hawaii — $140.7M (Department of Defense)
- Fixed Price Award FEE Construction - Gmac — $128.0M (Department of Defense)
- Metc Buildings 1 and 2, FT. SAM Houston Texas — $104.8M (Department of Defense)
- Hurricane Michael Repairs Phase 1 — $69.2M (Department of Defense)
- Disposal of Hazardous Waste for Mnc-I Forward Operating Base Support, Iraq — $52.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)