CACI, INC.-FEDERAL awarded $16.5M for administrative management consulting services to the Army Reserve
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,480,491 ($16.5M)
Contractor: CACI, Inc.-Federal
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-29
End Date: 2010-11-28
Contract Duration: 1,521 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: ARMY RESERVE VRA LABOR TAS::21 2020::TAS
Place of Performance
Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30310
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.5 million to CACI, INC.-FEDERAL for work described as: ARMY RESERVE VRA LABOR TAS::21 2020::TAS Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Services were procured through full and open competition. 3. The contract duration was 1521 days. 4. The contract type was Time and Materials. 5. The award was a Delivery Order. 6. The primary place of performance was Georgia.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $16.5 million for administrative management consulting services over approximately four years appears to be within a reasonable range for similar government contracts. However, without specific details on the scope of work and deliverables, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against industry standards for management consulting services would provide further context, but the provided data does not allow for a detailed per-unit cost analysis.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 4 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally supports price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to bid, potentially driving down costs and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.
Public Impact
The Army Reserve benefits from administrative and management consulting services to improve operational efficiency. Services likely support various administrative functions within the Army Reserve. The primary geographic impact is in Georgia, where the services were performed. The contract supports the workforce of CACI, INC.-FEDERAL and potentially its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The Time and Materials contract type can pose a risk of cost overruns if not closely monitored.
- Limited insight into specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the consulting services.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
- The contract was awarded to a known entity, CACI, INC.-FEDERAL, suggesting a degree of familiarity with their capabilities.
Sector Analysis
Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) is a significant sector within government contracting. This contract represents a portion of the broader federal spending on professional services aimed at improving organizational efficiency and effectiveness. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar consulting engagements within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies would provide further context on the scale of this award.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely limited unless CACI, INC.-FEDERAL voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Professional Services Contracts
- Army Reserve Administrative Support
- Management and Consulting Services
Risk Flags
- Time and Materials contract type may lead to cost overruns if not managed properly.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes objective assessment difficult.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, army-reserve, administrative-management-consulting, general-management-consulting, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, time-and-materials, georgia, professional-services, management-consulting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.5 million to CACI, INC.-FEDERAL. ARMY RESERVE VRA LABOR TAS::21 2020::TAS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CACI, INC.-FEDERAL.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-29. End: 2010-11-28.
What specific administrative and management consulting services were provided under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' under NAICS code 541611. However, the specific tasks, deliverables, and objectives of these consulting services are not detailed in the provided information. Typically, such services could encompass areas like organizational structure analysis, process improvement, strategic planning support, human capital management consulting, or operational efficiency studies. A deeper dive into the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) would be necessary to understand the precise nature and scope of the services rendered by CACI, INC.-FEDERAL to the Army Reserve.
How does the $16.5 million award compare to other similar administrative consulting contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?
Comparing the $16.5 million award to other similar contracts requires access to a broader dataset of Army administrative consulting awards over the contract's period of performance (2006-2010). Without this comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state whether this award was high, low, or average. However, for a contract spanning over four years (1521 days), $16.5 million suggests an average annual value of approximately $4.1 million. This figure can be benchmarked against other multi-year consulting contracts for management and administrative support within the DoD to gauge its relative size and potential value.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate CACI, INC.-FEDERAL's performance on this contract?
The provided data does not include information on the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate CACI, INC.-FEDERAL's performance. Government contracts for consulting services typically include performance standards outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW). These standards might relate to the quality of deliverables, timeliness of reports, effectiveness of recommendations, or client satisfaction. Without access to the contract's performance clauses, assessing how CACI's performance was measured and whether they met expectations is not possible.
What is the historical spending trend for administrative management consulting services within the Army Reserve?
The provided data only pertains to a single contract award from 2006-2010. To analyze historical spending trends for administrative management consulting services within the Army Reserve, a comprehensive review of contract awards over multiple fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve querying federal procurement databases for all contracts classified under NAICS code 541611 (or similar codes) awarded to the Army Reserve. Examining trends in award volume, total spending, and average contract values over time would reveal patterns and the significance of this particular $16.5 million award within that broader context.
Were there any specific challenges or risks identified during the performance of this contract?
The provided data does not explicitly detail any specific challenges or risks encountered during the performance of this contract. However, general risks associated with Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, such as potential cost overruns if not managed diligently, are inherent. Other potential challenges in consulting engagements can include scope creep, difficulties in achieving desired outcomes, or changes in government requirements. A thorough review of contract performance reports, modification history, or any associated Inspector General reports would be needed to identify any documented performance issues or risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14151 PARK MEADOW DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,875,661
Exercised Options: $16,875,660
Current Obligation: $16,480,491
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DABK0103D0006
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-29
Current End Date: 2010-11-28
Potential End Date: 2010-11-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-08-07
More Contracts from CACI, Inc.-Federal
- Award Made to CACI, Inc.-Federal for Jida Fs/De Task Order, in the Amount NOT to Exceed $1,773,158,264.00. Igf::cl::igf — $960.0M (General Services Administration)
- Federal Contract — $926.2M (General Services Administration)
- Beagle Task Order Award — $824.3M (General Services Administration)
- CDM Defend Group a Bridge Task Order — $713.4M (General Services Administration)
- Dynamic and Evolving Federal Enterprise Network Defense Group a Defend a Option Exercise and Transfer From Piid 47qfca18f0050 — $708.3M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)