DoD awards $10.7M for Systems Engineering Services to Tybrin Corporation, with Jacobs Technology Inc. as a competitor
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,786,514 ($10.8M)
Contractor: Jacobs Technology Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-02-02
End Date: 2006-01-01
Contract Duration: 333 days
Daily Burn Rate: $32.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE AWARD FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200505!000195!5700!FA8217!OO-ALC/PKHC/LHKC !F4260001D0027 !A!N! !N!0016 ! !20050202!20051231!037305646!037305646!037305646!N!TYBRIN CORPORATION !1030 TITAN COURT !FORT WALTON BE !FL!32547!24475!091!12!FORT WALTON BEACH !OKALOOSA !FLORIDA !+000001630500!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !334111!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !20200930!B!F! !A! !A!N!M!2!002!K! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !A! !B!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: FORT WALTON BEACH, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32547
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.8 million to JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC for work described as: 200505!000195!5700!FA8217!OO-ALC/PKHC/LHKC !F4260001D0027 !A!N! !N!0016 ! !20050202!20051231!037305646!037305646!037305646!N!TYBRIN CORPORATION !1030 TITAN COURT !FORT WALTON BE !FL!32547!24475!091!12!FORT WALTON BEACH !OKAL… Key points: 1. The contract value is $10.7 million for Systems Engineering Services. 2. Jacobs Technology Inc. was a competitor in this procurement. 3. The contract was awarded under Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. 4. The sector is primarily IT/Defense related due to the nature of systems engineering services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $10.7 million for systems engineering services appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized technical support. However, without specific details on the scope of work and deliverables, a precise comparison to similar contracts is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a limited competition where some potential sources were excluded. This method might impact price discovery by reducing the number of bidding entities.
Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition could potentially lead to a higher price than if full and open competition were utilized, impacting taxpayer value.
Public Impact
Defense agencies rely on systems engineering for complex project management and technical oversight. Contractors providing these services play a crucial role in ensuring successful military technology development. The competition method raises questions about the extent of taxpayer savings achieved.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition raises concerns about potential overpricing.
- Exclusion of sources may have reduced competitive pressure.
- Fixed Price Award Fee contract type can incentivize contractor performance but requires careful monitoring.
Positive Signals
- Award to a specific company (Tybrin Corporation) indicates a successful bid.
- Clear contract duration and start/end dates provide predictability.
Sector Analysis
Systems Engineering Services fall within the broader IT and Defense sectors, often involving complex technical support for government programs. Spending benchmarks for such services vary widely based on project complexity and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors in this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the specific effectiveness of this oversight in ensuring optimal value for money is not detailed.
Related Government Programs
- Electronic Computer Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition
- Potential for reduced price discovery
- Lack of detailed scope of work for value assessment
- Need for oversight on award fee determination
Tags
electronic-computer-manufacturing, department-of-defense, fl, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.8 million to JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC. 200505!000195!5700!FA8217!OO-ALC/PKHC/LHKC !F4260001D0027 !A!N! !N!0016 ! !20050202!20051231!037305646!037305646!037305646!N!TYBRIN CORPORATION !1030 TITAN COURT !FORT WALTON BE !FL!32547!24475!091!12!FORT WALTON BEACH !OKALOOSA !FLORIDA !+000001630500!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !334111!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-02-02. End: 2006-01-01.
What specific systems engineering tasks were included in this contract, and how do they align with the awarded price?
The provided data identifies the service as 'SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES' but lacks granular detail on the specific tasks. To assess value, a breakdown of labor categories, hours, and rates, alongside a clear statement of work, would be necessary to compare against industry standards and the awarded price of $10.7 million.
What were the reasons for excluding certain sources in the competition, and did this exclusion lead to a higher price?
The contract type 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' implies specific justifications for excluding potential bidders. Understanding these reasons is critical to evaluating if the exclusion was warranted and if it resulted in a less competitive environment, potentially inflating the cost to taxpayers.
How effectively did the 'FIXED PRICE AWARD FEE' structure incentivize Tybrin Corporation's performance and ensure mission success?
The Fixed Price Award Fee structure aims to balance cost control with performance incentives. Evaluating its effectiveness requires examining the performance metrics, award fee determinations, and the ultimate success of the systems engineering services delivered under this contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing › Electronic Computer Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE AWARD FEE (M)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc (UEI: 074103508)
Address: 1030 TITAN COURT, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL, 32547
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F4260001D0027
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-02-02
Current End Date: 2006-01-01
Potential End Date: 2006-01-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-10-17
More Contracts from Jacobs Technology Inc
- Federal Contract — $411.8M (Department of Defense)
- IT Support Services — $147.5M (Department of Defense)
- Combat Environment Simulation — $135.2M (Department of Defense)
- Etass 1.75 Engineering and Advisory Assitance Services- HB — $133.6M (Department of Defense)
- Information Technology Support Services — $110.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)