DoD awards $11.5M contract for logistics consulting services to GEORGE GROUP CONSULTING
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,522,023 ($11.5M)
Contractor: George Group Consulting, L P
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-30
End Date: 2007-12-30
Contract Duration: 456 days
Daily Burn Rate: $25.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)
Sector: Other
Official Description: MBB
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.5 million to GEORGE GROUP CONSULTING, L P for work described as: MBB Key points: 1. Contract awarded to GEORGE GROUP CONSULTING, L P for $11.5M. 2. Service category is Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 4. Contract duration was 456 days, ending in December 2007. 5. The award was made by the Department of the Army.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $11.5M for a 456-day contract for logistics consulting is difficult to benchmark without specific deliverables. However, the contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally supports fair pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method typically fosters price discovery and competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value through a competitive process.
Public Impact
Logistics consulting services can impact the efficiency of military operations. The Department of Defense relies on such services for optimizing supply chains. Transparency in contracting ensures public trust in defense spending.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
- Contract ended in 2007, limiting current relevance.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Clear identification of service type (logistics consulting).
Sector Analysis
Logistics consulting services are crucial for optimizing supply chains and operational efficiency within the defense sector. Spending in this area can vary significantly based on the complexity of military operations and the need for specialized expertise.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were solicited or subcontracted.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Standard procurement oversight processes would apply, but specific oversight details are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract awarded over 15 years ago.
- Limited information on specific services and outcomes.
- No indication of small business participation.
- No performance metrics provided.
Tags
process-physical-distribution-and-logist, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.5 million to GEORGE GROUP CONSULTING, L P. MBB
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GEORGE GROUP CONSULTING, L P.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-30. End: 2007-12-30.
What were the specific deliverables and performance metrics associated with this $11.5M contract to assess its true value for the services rendered?
The provided data lacks specific details on the deliverables and performance metrics. To assess the true value, one would need to examine the contract's statement of work, task orders, and any performance reports. Without this, it's challenging to determine if the $11.5M was a fair price for the achieved outcomes and impact on logistics operations.
Given the contract ended in 2007, what are the potential risks associated with using outdated data for current federal spending analysis?
Using outdated data from 2007 poses risks of misinterpreting current market conditions, technological advancements, and evolving service needs. Inflation, changes in consulting methodologies, and shifts in defense priorities mean that cost benchmarks and service expectations have likely changed significantly, potentially skewing any comparative analysis.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best possible outcome for the Department of the Army in this specific contract?
While full and open competition is designed to maximize value, its effectiveness hinges on the quality of proposals received and the evaluation criteria. Without access to the bidding process details, number of bidders, and the final selection rationale, it's impossible to definitively state how effectively it ensured the best outcome. The award to a single vendor suggests they met the requirements best at the time.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 13355 NOEL RD STE 1600, DALLAS, TX, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,522,023
Exercised Options: $11,522,023
Current Obligation: $11,522,023
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W74V8H06A0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-30
Current End Date: 2007-12-30
Potential End Date: 2007-12-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-10-16
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)