DoD's $29M Roebling Steel Superfund Site Remediation Contract Awarded to Sevenson Environmental Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,967,983 ($29.0M)

Contractor: Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-09-30

End Date: 2014-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TAS::68 8195::TAS RECOVERYPROJECT::ROEBLING STEEL OU5, ROBELING STEEL SUPERFUND SITE:: REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED SOILS AND INSTALLATION OF SHORELINE PROTECTION AT THE ROEBLING STEEL SUPERFUND SITE

Place of Performance

Location: ROEBLING, BURLINGTON County, NEW JERSEY, 08554

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.0 million to SEVENSON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: TAS::68 8195::TAS RECOVERYPROJECT::ROEBLING STEEL OU5, ROBELING STEEL SUPERFUND SITE:: REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED SOILS AND INSTALLATION OF SHORELINE PROTECTION AT THE ROEBLING STEEL SUPERFUND SITE Key points: 1. The contract focuses on environmental remediation and shoreline protection at a Superfund site. 2. Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. is the prime contractor for this Department of the Army award. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, indicating potential for cost overruns. 4. The remediation services sector is critical for environmental protection and public health. 5. The award was made under full and open competition after exclusion of sources.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts if not managed carefully. Benchmarking per-unit costs for similar remediation projects is difficult due to site-specific variables.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition after excluding specific sources, suggesting a competitive process was intended. However, the exclusion of sources may limit the pool of potential bidders and impact price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for environmental cleanup, which is a necessary but potentially costly public service. Efficient execution is key to minimizing financial impact.

Public Impact

Addresses environmental contamination at a Superfund site, improving public health and safety. Shoreline protection measures mitigate further environmental damage and potential ecological impact. The remediation project aims to restore the site for future use or ecological benefit. Long-term monitoring may be required post-remediation to ensure effectiveness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Exclusion of sources in competition

Positive Signals

  • Addresses critical environmental remediation needs
  • Awarded under full and open competition
  • Focus on public health and safety

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Remediation Services sector, which is crucial for addressing legacy industrial pollution. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the scale and complexity of contamination.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial for Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts to ensure costs are reasonable and work is performed efficiently. The Department of Defense and Army are responsible for monitoring contract performance.

Related Government Programs

  • Remediation Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type may lead to higher costs.
  • Exclusion of sources could limit competition and potentially increase price.
  • Contract duration of 5 years requires sustained oversight.
  • Remediation projects can face unforeseen technical challenges.
  • Environmental cleanup effectiveness requires long-term monitoring.

Tags

remediation-services, department-of-defense, nj, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.0 million to SEVENSON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.. TAS::68 8195::TAS RECOVERYPROJECT::ROEBLING STEEL OU5, ROBELING STEEL SUPERFUND SITE:: REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED SOILS AND INSTALLATION OF SHORELINE PROTECTION AT THE ROEBLING STEEL SUPERFUND SITE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SEVENSON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-30. End: 2014-09-29.

What were the specific reasons for excluding certain sources during the full and open competition?

The exclusion of sources in a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award typically relates to specific technical requirements, security clearances, or unique capabilities that only a limited number of contractors possess. Without further details on the solicitation, it's difficult to ascertain the exact rationale, but it suggests a need for specialized expertise or equipment for the Roebling Steel Superfund site remediation.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure impact the government's risk in this remediation project?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure shifts some cost risk to the government. While the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs, the fixed fee provides them with a guaranteed profit margin. This structure is often used when the scope of work is uncertain, but it necessitates robust government oversight to control costs and prevent contractor inefficiencies from inflating the final price.

What is the long-term effectiveness expected from the shoreline protection measures at the Roebling Steel Superfund Site?

The long-term effectiveness of shoreline protection measures depends on the specific design, materials used, and the environmental conditions they are intended to mitigate (e.g., erosion, flooding, contaminant migration). These measures are crucial for preventing the spread of contamination and stabilizing the site. Regular monitoring and potential maintenance will be necessary to ensure their continued efficacy over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesRemediation and Other Waste Management ServicesRemediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: DACW4103R0068

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2749 LOCKPORT ROAD, NIAGARA FALLS, NY, 14305

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,967,983

Exercised Options: $28,967,983

Current Obligation: $28,967,983

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DQ04D0023

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-09-30

Current End Date: 2014-09-29

Potential End Date: 2014-09-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-05-09

More Contracts from Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc.

View all Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending