DoD Extends V-22 PBL 2.0 Support by 2 Years, Costing $360M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $359,813,791 ($359.8M)

Contractor: Bell Boeing Joint Project Office

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-01-01

End Date: 2018-12-31

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $493.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: V-22 PBL 2.0, SCM SUPPORT. 2-YEAR EXTENSION

Place of Performance

Location: AMARILLO, POTTER County, TEXAS, 79111

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $359.8 million to BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICE for work described as: V-22 PBL 2.0, SCM SUPPORT. 2-YEAR EXTENSION Key points: 1. The contract extension for V-22 Osprey sustainment is valued at $359.8M. 2. Competition was limited, with the contract awarded to Bell Boeing Joint Project Office. 3. Potential risks include reliance on a single source for critical support. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract is a Cost Plus Incentive Fee type, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar sustainment contracts for complex aircraft is difficult due to unique program specifics.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition scenario. This limits price discovery and potentially increases costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a fully competed contract.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. The V-22 Osprey is a critical asset for the Navy, making sustainment essential. Long-term sustainment contracts can lock in costs but also reduce flexibility.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure
  • Potential for cost overruns

Positive Signals

  • Ensures continued operational readiness of V-22 aircraft
  • Provides critical sustainment support

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting the V-22 Osprey aircraft. Spending on aircraft sustainment is a significant portion of the DoD budget, with benchmarks varying widely based on aircraft type and age.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication of small business participation in this specific contract extension. The prime contractor, Bell Boeing Joint Project Office, is a large entity, and subcontracts would need further analysis to determine small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's limited competition and cost-plus nature warrant close oversight to ensure cost efficiency and prevent potential waste. Regular performance reviews and audits are crucial.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source provider
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Lack of transparency in pricing

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, tx, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $359.8 million to BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICE. V-22 PBL 2.0, SCM SUPPORT. 2-YEAR EXTENSION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $359.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-01-01. End: 2018-12-31.

What is the historical cost performance of this contract and similar V-22 sustainment efforts?

Historical cost performance data for this specific contract and similar V-22 sustainment efforts would be crucial for a comprehensive value assessment. Analyzing trends in cost overruns, incentive fee payouts, and deviations from target costs can reveal patterns of efficiency or inefficiency. Benchmarking against industry standards for aircraft sustainment, adjusted for program complexity, is also necessary.

What are the specific risks associated with relying on a single source for V-22 sustainment support?

Relying on a single source for V-22 sustainment creates significant risks, including potential price gouging, lack of innovation, and vulnerability to supply chain disruptions. If the sole provider experiences financial difficulties or operational issues, it could severely impact the readiness of the V-22 fleet. Furthermore, the government has limited leverage to negotiate favorable terms without competitive pressure.

How effectively does the Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure incentivize cost control for V-22 sustainment?

The effectiveness of the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure in controlling costs for V-22 sustainment depends heavily on the realism of the target cost and the aggressiveness of the incentive sharing formula. If the target cost is set too high, the contractor may not be sufficiently motivated to reduce expenses. Conversely, a well-defined CPIF with achievable targets and meaningful incentives can encourage efficiency and cost savings for both parties.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 401 TILTROTOR DR PLANT A, AMARILLO, TX, 79111

Business Categories: Category Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $359,813,791

Exercised Options: $359,813,791

Current Obligation: $359,813,791

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0001909D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2017-01-01

Current End Date: 2018-12-31

Potential End Date: 2021-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-06-26

More Contracts from Bell Boeing Joint Project Office

View all Bell Boeing Joint Project Office federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending