DoD's $17.2M Building Repair Contract Awarded to RCI Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,199,231 ($17.2M)
Contractor: RCI Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-30
End Date: 2011-08-07
Contract Duration: 1,772 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Construction
Official Description: BUILDING REPAIR AFRRI
Place of Performance
Location: BETHESDA, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20814
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.2 million to RCI INC. for work described as: BUILDING REPAIR AFRRI Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $17.2 million, was awarded by the Department of the Army. 2. RCI Inc. secured the contract through full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 3. The contract duration was 1772 days, indicating a long-term project. 4. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. 5. The award was a delivery order under a larger contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $17.2 million for building repair over approximately five years suggests a moderate per-year expenditure. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction and repair contracts would be necessary for a precise value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a competitive process where multiple sources were considered, but specific exclusions were applied. This method aims for price discovery but the exclusions might limit the breadth of competition.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is intended to secure fair pricing for taxpayers, though the specific exclusions could potentially impact the final cost compared to unrestricted full and open competition.
Public Impact
Taxpayers funded a significant infrastructure repair project managed by the Department of the Army. The project's duration suggests a substantial impact on the local Maryland facility where the repairs were conducted. The use of Time and Materials pricing could lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored. The contract's completion indicates a resolved need for building repairs at the specified Army facility.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
- The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition method warrants further investigation.
- Lack of specific details on the nature of the building repairs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value.
- Project completed, indicating successful delivery of required services.
- Managed by the Department of Defense, implying adherence to established procurement standards.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a broad category encompassing various repair and maintenance activities for non-residential structures. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on infrastructure needs and government investment cycles.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that neither small business set-aside nor subcontracting was a factor in this contract award. This suggests that the primary awardee, RCI Inc., is likely a larger entity, and opportunities for small businesses may have been limited in this specific procurement.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense, which typically has robust oversight mechanisms. However, the specific oversight applied to this delivery order, especially concerning the Time and Materials aspect, is not detailed.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Time and Materials pricing can lead to cost uncertainty.
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusions.
- Lack of detail on the specific nature of building repairs.
- No indication of small business participation.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.2 million to RCI INC.. BUILDING REPAIR AFRRI
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RCI INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-30. End: 2011-08-07.
What was the specific justification for excluding certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, and did this exclusion impact the final price?
The justification for excluding specific sources under this procurement method is not provided in the data. Such exclusions can sometimes limit the competitive landscape, potentially leading to higher prices than if all potential sources were allowed to bid. Further investigation into the solicitation documents would be required to understand the rationale and its financial implications.
Given the Time and Materials pricing structure, what measures were in place to control costs and prevent potential overruns during the 1772-day contract period?
The provided data does not detail the specific cost control measures implemented for this Time and Materials contract. Effective oversight typically involves detailed tracking of labor hours and material costs, establishing not-to-exceed limits, and regular reviews of expenditures to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently and prevent unexpected cost escalations.
How does the $17.2 million expenditure for building repairs compare to industry benchmarks for similar projects of comparable scale and complexity within the Department of Defense?
Without specific details on the scope and nature of the building repairs, a direct comparison to industry benchmarks is challenging. However, $17.2 million over nearly five years for a single facility's repairs suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking would require detailed project specifications, location, and the type of construction involved to assess if the cost was competitive.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Contractor Details
Address: 812 LYNDON LANE, LOUISVILLE, KY, 40222
Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,199,231
Exercised Options: $17,199,231
Current Obligation: $17,199,231
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DACA8703D0004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-30
Current End Date: 2011-08-07
Potential End Date: 2011-08-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-26
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)