DoD's $9.9M Firm Fixed Price Contract Awarded to STRAUB/PACIFIC LLC for Unspecified Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,925,200 ($9.9M)

Contractor: Straub/Pacific LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-03-31

End Date: 2008-06-30

Contract Duration: 822 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: YUMA, YUMA County, ARIZONA, 85365

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $9.9 million to STRAUB/PACIFIC LLC for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract value is $9,925,199.55. 2. Awarded under Full and Open Competition. 3. The contract duration was 822 days. 4. No specific product or service code (PSC) was identified, limiting detailed sector analysis.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of nearly $10 million over two years is substantial. Without knowing the specific service or product, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts or assess value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a broad search for qualified bidders. However, the lack of a specific PSC makes it hard to determine if this competition was truly effective in driving down costs or ensuring the best possible price.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for this contract. The effectiveness of the competition in securing optimal pricing is unclear, potentially impacting the overall value for taxpayers.

Public Impact

Nearly $10 million in federal funds were obligated. The contract supported services for the Department of the Army. The duration of the contract was over two years. The specific nature of the services procured remains undisclosed, limiting public understanding of government spending.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific service/product details
Unclear value for money due to lack of context
Limited insight into competition effectiveness

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition
Firm Fixed Price contract type can provide cost certainty

Sector Analysis

The absence of a Product or Service Code (PSC) prevents a precise sector classification. However, given the Department of the Army as the agency, it could range from IT services to construction or specialized support. Benchmarking is impossible without this detail.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition' and does not specify if small businesses were involved or subcontracted. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Standard contract award procedures were followed, including full and open competition. However, the lack of detailed information on the service provided raises questions about transparency and the ability for public oversight.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of specific service/product description
Inability to benchmark pricing or value
Limited transparency for public oversight
Potential for inefficient use of taxpayer funds
Unclear impact on small businesses

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $9.9 million to STRAUB/PACIFIC LLC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STRAUB/PACIFIC LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-31. End: 2008-06-30.

What specific services or products were procured under this $9.9 million contract?

The provided data does not specify the services or products procured. This lack of detail is a significant gap, making it impossible to assess the necessity, effectiveness, or value for money of the expenditure. Understanding the nature of the acquisition is crucial for any meaningful analysis of federal spending.

How did the 'Full and Open Competition' process ensure the best value and pricing for these unspecified services?

While 'Full and Open Competition' suggests a broad solicitation, the absence of a specific Product or Service Code (PSC) hinders the ability to evaluate the effectiveness of the competition. Without knowing what was being bought, it's impossible to determine if the bidding process yielded competitive pricing or if the chosen vendor offered the best value proposition compared to market rates.

What is the taxpayer impact of awarding a nearly $10 million contract without clearly defining the acquired services?

The primary taxpayer impact is the risk of overpayment or procurement of unnecessary services due to the lack of transparency. Without defined deliverables and measurable outcomes, it's challenging to ensure that taxpayer funds were used efficiently and effectively. This opacity makes accountability difficult and could set a precedent for less scrutinized spending.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 26054 ACERO, MISSION VIEJO, CA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DACA0902D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline