Army contract for $10.3M for mission support services awarded to Communication Technologies, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,290,117 ($10.3M)

Contractor: Communication Technologies, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-03-30

End Date: 2006-07-10

Contract Duration: 102 days

Daily Burn Rate: $100.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200607!600151!2100!W912SU!ACA, NRCC - MISSION DIVISION !DABT6002D0003 !A!N! !Y!0009 ! !20060330!20061214!628118226!628118226!628118226!N!COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC!14151 NEWBROOK DR STE 400 !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!14744!059!51!CHANTILLY !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000010290117!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561990!E! !5!A!S! ! !D!20061214!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!002!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! !2100! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.3 million to COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC for work described as: 200607!600151!2100!W912SU!ACA, NRCC - MISSION DIVISION !DABT6002D0003 !A!N! !Y!0009 ! !20060330!20061214!628118226!628118226!628118226!N!COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC!14151 NEWBROOK DR STE 400 !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!14744!059!51!CHANTILLY !FAIR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for mission support services, indicating a need for specialized operational assistance. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract is approximately 102 days, suggesting a short-term or project-specific need. 4. The contract was awarded in fiscal year 2006, providing historical context for spending. 5. The contractor, Communication Technologies, Inc., is based in Chantilly, Virginia. 6. The contract falls under the 'Other Management Support Services' category, highlighting the diverse nature of federal service procurements.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.3 million for a duration of approximately 102 days appears to be on the higher side for the services rendered, especially considering the relatively short period. Without more granular data on the specific deliverables and the market rates for such mission support services in 2006, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the per-day cost is substantial, suggesting either highly specialized expertise or significant resource allocation was required.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement. While competition is generally positive, the number of bidders could be higher for a contract of this value, potentially impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers likely benefited from the competitive bidding process, which should have driven down costs compared to a sole-source award. However, the moderate number of bidders may mean that the full potential cost savings were not realized.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely military units or government agencies requiring mission support services, ensuring operational readiness and effectiveness. The services delivered are categorized as 'Other Management Support Services,' which could encompass a wide range of activities from logistical planning to administrative support. The geographic impact is centered around the operations supported by the Department of the Army, potentially within the continental United States or overseas. Workforce implications include the potential employment of personnel by Communication Technologies, Inc. to fulfill the contract requirements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns given the high daily expenditure.
Scope creep could be a risk in mission support contracts if not clearly defined.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical mission support functions.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, ensuring a fair process.
Contractor has a physical address and is a registered entity, suggesting a degree of legitimacy.
Contract has a defined start and end date, providing a clear timeframe for service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically under 'Other Management Support Services.' In 2006, federal spending in this area was significant, supporting various government functions. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific nature of the mission support, but contracts for specialized services often represent a substantial portion of agency budgets. The market for such services is typically competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in areas like logistics, program management, and operational support.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, and the contract value suggests it was likely competed more broadly. The prime contractor, Communication Technologies, Inc., is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, but this would depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the nature of the services required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is facilitated by the existence of contract data, though detailed performance reports are not publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Support Services
Army Mission Readiness Contracts
Management and Consulting Services
Federal IT and Communications Support
Logistics and Operational Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract duration is relatively short for the awarded value.
Limited number of bidders for a contract of this size.
Service category is broad, making specific performance assessment difficult without SOW details.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.3 million to COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 200607!600151!2100!W912SU!ACA, NRCC - MISSION DIVISION !DABT6002D0003 !A!N! !Y!0009 ! !20060330!20061214!628118226!628118226!628118226!N!COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC!14151 NEWBROOK DR STE 400 !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!14744!059!51!CHANTILLY !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000010290117!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561990!E! !5!A!S! ! !D!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-30. End: 2006-07-10.

What specific mission support services were rendered under this contract?

The contract data indicates the service category as 'Other Management Support Services' (NAICS 561990). While the specific details are not provided, this category typically encompasses a broad range of support functions. These could include, but are not limited to, program management, administrative support, logistical coordination, technical assistance, and operational planning. Given the Department of the Army as the awarding agency, the services likely supported military operations, readiness initiatives, or administrative functions critical to the Army's mission. Without access to the contract's statement of work, a precise definition of the services remains elusive.

How does the $10.3 million value compare to similar mission support contracts awarded around 2006?

Comparing the $10.3 million value requires context regarding the contract's duration and scope. For a contract lasting approximately 102 days (about 3.4 months), this represents a significant daily expenditure. In 2006, federal agencies, particularly the Department of Defense, awarded numerous contracts for support services. However, the 'mission support' umbrella is broad. Contracts for highly specialized technical support, extensive logistical planning, or critical operational management could command such figures. To provide a precise benchmark, one would need to compare it against contracts with similar service descriptions, durations, and agency needs from the same period. Generally, contracts of this magnitude suggest a substantial requirement for personnel, expertise, or resources.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. Typically, these would be detailed within the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). For 'Other Management Support Services,' KPIs could relate to timeliness of support, accuracy of administrative tasks, efficiency of logistical coordination, or successful execution of operational plans. The contracting officer and program managers would monitor these metrics to ensure the contractor met its obligations. Failure to meet KPIs could result in penalties, reduced payment, or contract termination.

What is the track record of Communication Technologies, Inc. with federal contracts prior to or around 2006?

The provided data indicates that Communication Technologies, Inc. was awarded this specific contract (DABT6002D0003) valued at $10,290,117.00. It was a Firm Fixed Price contract awarded on March 30, 2006, with an estimated completion date of July 10, 2006, and was competed under 'Full and Open Competition' with 3 bidders. Beyond this single data point, the provided information does not offer details on the company's broader federal contracting history, including prior awards, performance ratings, or other contracts held around that time. A comprehensive assessment of their track record would require access to a more extensive federal procurement database.

Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with the performance of this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly list any identified risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this specific contract. However, general risks associated with 'mission support services' can include scope creep, difficulties in coordinating with military or government personnel, unforeseen operational changes, and challenges in meeting tight deadlines. The fact that it was a Firm Fixed Price contract suggests that the risk of cost overruns was primarily borne by the contractor, Communication Technologies, Inc. Without post-award performance reports or contract close-out documentation, specific performance-related risks are not detailed.

What was the total federal spending on 'Other Management Support Services' (NAICS 561990) in FY2006?

The provided data focuses on a single contract (DABT6002D0003) awarded to Communication Technologies, Inc. It does not contain information on the total federal spending for the entire 'Other Management Support Services' category (NAICS 561990) in Fiscal Year 2006. To determine this aggregate spending figure, one would need to query a comprehensive federal procurement database, filtering by the specific NAICS code and the relevant fiscal year across all federal agencies. Such data would provide a broader market context for the $10.3 million contract awarded by the Department of the Army.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Other Support Services › All Other Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 14151 NEWBROOK DRIVE, 4TH, CHANTILLY, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DABT6002D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline