DoD's $27.5M Non-Standard Weapons Contract Awarded to Sweet Analysis Services, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,484,093 ($27.5M)
Contractor: Sweet Analysis Services, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-02-16
End Date: 2010-07-31
Contract Duration: 1,261 days
Daily Burn Rate: $21.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: NON-STANDARD WEAPONS
Place of Performance
Location: ALEXANDRIA, ALEXANDRIA (CITY) County, VIRGINIA, 22314
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $27.5 million to SWEET ANALYSIS SERVICES, INC for work described as: NON-STANDARD WEAPONS Key points: 1. Contract value of $27.5M for non-standard weapons. 2. Awarded to Sweet Analysis Services, Inc. under full and open competition. 3. Potential risk associated with specialized 'non-standard' weapon systems. 4. Spending falls within the 'Defense' sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $27.5M for non-standard weapons appears moderate. Benchmarking is difficult without specific details on the 'non-standard' nature of the weapons, but the duration suggests a significant undertaking.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, aiming to secure the best value for the funds expended on these specialized weapon systems.
Public Impact
Procurement of specialized 'non-standard' weapons raises questions about their intended use and necessity. The duration of the contract (over 3 years) indicates a sustained need for these items. Transparency regarding the specific types of 'non-standard' weapons procured is limited.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specificity in 'non-standard weapons'
- Potential for niche, high-cost items
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized
- Firm Fixed Price contract type
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Defense sector, specifically related to ordnance manufacturing. Spending benchmarks for 'non-standard' weapons are highly variable and depend on the specific nature of the items procured.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Sweet Analysis Services, Inc., and there is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors in this specific award. Further investigation would be needed to confirm.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army awarded this contract, implying oversight from a major branch of the Department of Defense. The firm fixed price contract type provides some cost control, but oversight of the 'non-standard' nature of the items is crucial.
Related Government Programs
- Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of clarity on 'non-standard weapons'
- Potential for specialized, high-cost items
- Limited insight into specific item performance
- Unknown long-term sustainment costs
Tags
small-arms-ordnance-and-ordnance-accesso, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $27.5 million to SWEET ANALYSIS SERVICES, INC. NON-STANDARD WEAPONS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SWEET ANALYSIS SERVICES, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-02-16. End: 2010-07-31.
What specific types of 'non-standard' weapons were procured under this contract, and what is their operational purpose?
The data does not specify the exact nature of the 'non-standard' weapons. This term can encompass a wide range of items, from modified existing weapons to entirely novel designs. Understanding their operational purpose is critical for assessing their necessity and value to the Department of Defense's mission.
How does the per-unit cost of these 'non-standard' weapons compare to similar, standard ordnance items?
Without knowing the specific items procured, a direct per-unit cost comparison is impossible. 'Non-standard' often implies unique specifications or limited production runs, which can lead to higher per-unit costs compared to mass-produced standard ordnance. Benchmarking would require detailed itemization and cost analysis.
What is the long-term strategic value or necessity of procuring 'non-standard' weapons versus investing in standard, readily available ordnance?
The strategic value lies in addressing specific, unmet operational requirements that standard ordnance cannot fulfill. However, reliance on 'non-standard' items can create logistical challenges, higher sustainment costs, and potential interoperability issues. A balance is needed to ensure unique needs are met without compromising overall readiness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing › Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: WEAPONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W91CRB04R0026
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: SUITE 300, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,484,093
Exercised Options: $27,484,093
Current Obligation: $27,484,093
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W91CRB04D0024
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-02-16
Current End Date: 2010-07-31
Potential End Date: 2010-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-08-24
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)