DoD's $118M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. in 2005

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,028,166 ($10.0M)

Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-28

End Date: 2006-09-29

Contract Duration: 366 days

Daily Burn Rate: $27.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200512!540444!1700!M67854!COMMANDING GENERAL !M6785402A9017 !A!N! !Y!0007 ! !20050928!20060929!118312784!007923014!074103508!N!SVERDRUP TECHNOLOGY, INC !2010 LEWIS TURNER BLVD !FORT WALTON BE !FL!32547!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEXANDRIA (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000002600000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !20200930!C! ! !B! !A!U!J!2!004! ! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!A!N! ! ! ! !1727!M67854!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.0 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: 200512!540444!1700!M67854!COMMANDING GENERAL !M6785402A9017 !A!N! !Y!0007 ! !20050928!20060929!118312784!007923014!074103508!N!SVERDRUP TECHNOLOGY, INC !2010 LEWIS TURNER BLVD !FORT WALTON BE !FL!32547!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEX… Key points: 1. The contract was awarded for engineering services, a critical component of defense operations. 2. Amentum Technology, Inc. secured this significant contract, indicating their competitive standing in the sector. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. 4. The contract duration was one year, with a total value of $118,312,784.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $118.3 million for a one-year duration appears reasonable for specialized engineering services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale defense engineering contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. This method allows all eligible contractors to bid, promoting a fair marketplace.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently, as multiple bidders would have vied for the contract, driving down costs.

Public Impact

This contract supports critical defense infrastructure and operations, ensuring national security. The award to Amentum Technology, Inc. highlights the role of private sector expertise in government functions. The use of taxpayer dollars for defense services underscores the importance of accountability and efficient spending.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), which is vital for the Department of Defense's infrastructure and operational support. Spending in this sector is consistently high due to the complex needs of military operations.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. The award was made to Amentum Technology, Inc., a large corporation, suggesting limited direct benefit to small businesses through this specific prime contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense. Standard government oversight mechanisms would apply to ensure performance and proper use of funds, though specific oversight details are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.0 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. 200512!540444!1700!M67854!COMMANDING GENERAL !M6785402A9017 !A!N! !Y!0007 ! !20050928!20060929!118312784!007923014!074103508!N!SVERDRUP TECHNOLOGY, INC !2010 LEWIS TURNER BLVD !FORT WALTON BE !FL!32547!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEXANDRIA (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000002600000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-28. End: 2006-09-29.

What was the specific nature of the 'Program Management/Support Services' provided under this contract, and how did it contribute to the Navy's mission?

The 'Program Management/Support Services' likely encompassed a range of activities crucial for the Navy's operations, potentially including planning, execution, and monitoring of defense programs. These services are essential for ensuring that complex military projects are completed on time and within budget, directly supporting the Navy's strategic objectives and readiness.

Given the contract was awarded in 2005, what is the current relevance of its pricing and performance data for contemporary defense spending analysis?

The 2005 data provides historical context but has limited direct relevance for current spending analysis due to inflation, technological advancements, and shifts in market dynamics. While the competitive award process is a positive signal, current pricing benchmarks and contractor performance would need to be assessed against today's economic conditions and technological landscape for accurate contemporary analysis.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure optimal value for taxpayer money in this specific instance?

The full and open competition process is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bids and fostering price reduction. While this method generally leads to better value, the ultimate effectiveness depends on the specific bids received, the evaluation criteria used, and the final negotiated price. Without detailed bid information, it's presumed the process yielded competitive pricing, but a definitive assessment of 'optimal value' requires further analysis of the bidding landscape.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc (UEI: 074103508)

Address: 2010 LEWIS TURNER BLVD, FORT WALTON BE, FL

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785402A9017

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-09-28

Current End Date: 2006-09-29

Potential End Date: 2006-09-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-04-08

More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.

View all Amentum Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending