Department of Defense awards $12.26M construction contract to TECHNOLOGISTS INC for heavy engineering

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,264,653 ($12.3M)

Contractor: Technologists Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-08-29

End Date: 2008-12-24

Contract Duration: 1,213 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.3 million to TECHNOLOGISTS INC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $12.26 million for heavy and civil engineering construction. 2. Awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. 3. Contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs for the government. 4. Duration of 1213 days suggests a substantial, long-term project. 5. Competition level was 'Full and Open', implying broad market participation. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12.26 million for heavy and civil engineering construction appears within a reasonable range for a project of this nature and duration. Without specific project details or comparable contract benchmarks, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. Further analysis would require comparing the scope of work and final deliverables to similar projects awarded by the Department of the Army or other federal agencies.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, suggesting that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 6 bidders indicates a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensures the government receives offers from a wide range of qualified contractors, potentially leading to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition with multiple bidders typically benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and ensuring the government secures services at a competitive rate.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely military personnel and operations supported by the constructed facilities. Services delivered include heavy and civil engineering construction, essential for infrastructure development. Geographic impact is localized to the area where the construction project is situated, likely a military installation. Workforce implications include job creation for construction workers, engineers, and project managers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the scope of work is not clearly defined, despite the fixed-price nature.
Risk of delays if unforeseen site conditions or permitting issues arise during the extended project duration.
Ensuring the quality of construction meets stringent military standards requires robust oversight.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition with multiple bidders suggests a competitive award process.
The contractor, TECHNOLOGISTS INC, has secured a significant federal contract, indicating some level of capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, which is a critical component of infrastructure development for government agencies. The market for federal construction projects is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Defense consistently investing in facilities and infrastructure. This specific contract, valued at over $12 million, represents a significant procurement within this sector, likely for a project with a substantial scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This means that the primary contract was competed broadly, and opportunities for small businesses would likely be through direct subcontracting by the prime contractor, TECHNOLOGISTS INC, if they choose to engage them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration team within the Department of the Army. Quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs) would likely be in place to monitor performance, adherence to specifications, and timely completion. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific project progress details may be less publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Infrastructure Development
Heavy Engineering Services
Department of Defense Procurement

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of cost escalation or unforeseen issues.
Lack of small business set-aside may limit opportunities for smaller firms.
Need for robust oversight to ensure quality in extended construction projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.3 million to TECHNOLOGISTS INC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TECHNOLOGISTS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-08-29. End: 2008-12-24.

What specific type of heavy and civil engineering construction was performed under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 237990, which covers 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction.' This broad category can encompass a wide range of projects such as the construction of tunnels, bridges, waterways, dams, highways, streets, and other infrastructure projects not classified elsewhere. Without more specific details from the contract award itself (e.g., a project description or statement of work), it is difficult to pinpoint the exact nature of the construction performed. However, given the awarding agency (Department of the Army), it is plausible the project was related to military base infrastructure, training facilities, or logistical support structures.

How does the $12.26 million contract value compare to similar construction projects awarded by the Department of Defense?

Comparing the $12.26 million contract value requires context regarding the scope, duration, and complexity of the project. For the Department of Defense, which manages a vast portfolio of construction and infrastructure projects globally, this value could represent a medium-sized project. Larger military construction projects can easily run into hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars, while smaller repair or specialized construction tasks might be in the low millions or less. The 1213-day duration (over 3 years) suggests a project of significant scale and complexity, making the $12.26 million figure potentially reasonable for a multi-year undertaking in heavy civil engineering. Benchmarking against specific, comparable projects would require detailed analysis of project scope, location, and specific engineering requirements.

What are the potential risks associated with a 1213-day Firm Fixed Price construction contract?

While a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract aims to provide cost certainty, a long duration like 1213 days (over 3 years) introduces specific risks. One primary risk is the potential for unforeseen site conditions or material price escalation over such an extended period, which could strain the contractor's ability to maintain profitability without impacting quality, especially if contingency planning was inadequate. Scope creep, if not rigorously managed through change orders, can also become a significant issue. Furthermore, the contractor's financial stability and performance over such a long project timeline are critical; a downturn in the contractor's business could jeopardize project completion. The government's risk lies in ensuring the contractor's continued capacity and adherence to the fixed price, while the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns.

What does the 'Full and Open Competition' with 6 bidders signify for the Department of the Army?

A 'Full and Open Competition' with 6 bidders signifies a successful procurement process for the Department of the Army. It indicates that the agency effectively advertised the requirement to the broadest possible market, attracting a substantial number of interested and capable contractors. Having 6 bidders suggests a healthy competitive environment, which typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified offerors. This level of competition increases the likelihood that the Army secured the best value proposition, balancing cost, technical approach, and other evaluation factors, thereby maximizing the return on taxpayer investment for this heavy and civil engineering construction project.

Are there any indications of contractor performance issues or successes based on this award alone?

Based solely on this award data, it is not possible to determine the contractor's performance history, either positive or negative. The award itself signifies that TECHNOLOGISTS INC was deemed responsible and capable of performing the contract requirements at the time of selection, and that their offer was competitive. To assess performance, one would need to examine post-award data, such as contract modifications, performance reviews, payment history, and any potential disputes or claims filed during or after the contract period. The fact that they were awarded a contract of this size and duration by the Department of the Army suggests they met the initial qualification criteria.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 103 W BROAD STREET, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W917PM04D0005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline