Department of the Navy awards $26.9M contract for aircraft maintenance hangar repair at NAS Kingsville, TX

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,917,411 ($26.9M)

Contractor: WEB, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-02-27

End Date: 2020-02-13

Contract Duration: 1,081 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CON; DBB; REPAIR AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 3741 ST 1113152; NAS KINGSVILLE, TX.

Place of Performance

Location: KINGSVILLE, KLEBERG County, TEXAS, 78363

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.9 million to WEB, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CON; DBB; REPAIR AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 3741 ST 1113152; NAS KINGSVILLE, TX. Key points: 1. The contract was awarded using full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor assumes the risk for cost overruns. 3. The project involves construction services for a commercial and institutional building, specifically a maintenance hangar. 4. The duration of the contract is 1081 days, spanning from February 2017 to February 2020. 5. The awarded amount of $26.9 million represents a significant investment in naval aviation infrastructure. 6. The contractor, WEB, LLC, is responsible for the repair and maintenance of Hangar 3741.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $26.9 million for repairing an aircraft maintenance hangar appears reasonable given the scope of construction services and the duration of the contract. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects for military facilities suggests that this price falls within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price structure also indicates a commitment to cost control by the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This typically means that the solicitation was broadly advertised, but certain sources were excluded based on specific criteria, possibly related to security, capability, or past performance. The exclusion of sources suggests a targeted approach to ensure qualified bidders participated, while still maintaining a competitive environment.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and service quality.

Public Impact

Naval Air Station Kingsville, Texas, benefits from improved infrastructure for aircraft maintenance. The contract supports the operational readiness of naval aviation units stationed at NAS Kingsville. The project likely involved a significant number of construction workers, providing employment opportunities in the local Texas economy. The repaired hangar will enhance the efficiency and safety of aircraft maintenance operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen construction issues arise, although mitigated by firm-fixed-price.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to meet project timelines and quality standards.
Risk associated with the exclusion of certain sources, ensuring all capable vendors were considered.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Full and open competition generally leads to better value.
Project addresses critical infrastructure needs for naval aviation.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. The Department of Defense is a major client for construction services, with significant annual spending on facility maintenance, repair, and new builds. Comparable spending benchmarks for military hangar construction and repair vary widely based on size, complexity, and location, but projects in the tens of millions are common for major facility upgrades.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this specific contract, as the 'sb' field is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award appears limited, though larger prime contractors may engage small businesses for specific trades or materials.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and engineering departments. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified repairs within budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Naval Aviation Infrastructure
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) related projects
Facility Maintenance and Repair Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns (mitigated by FFP)
Contractor performance risk
Clarity on exclusion criteria for competition

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.9 million to WEB, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF CON; DBB; REPAIR AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 3741 ST 1113152; NAS KINGSVILLE, TX.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WEB, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-02-27. End: 2020-02-13.

What is the track record of WEB, LLC in performing similar large-scale construction contracts for the Department of Defense?

Assessing the track record of WEB, LLC requires accessing historical contract data and performance reviews. While the provided data confirms WEB, LLC was awarded this $26.9 million contract for hangar repair, it does not detail their past performance on similar projects. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would be necessary to identify previous contracts, their values, and any associated performance ratings or past performance questionnaires. This would help determine if WEB, LLC has a history of successfully completing complex construction projects on time and within budget for military clients, and if they have experience with aviation-specific facilities.

How does the awarded price of $26.9 million compare to similar aircraft maintenance hangar repair projects at other naval installations?

To benchmark the $26.9 million award, a comparative analysis with similar projects is crucial. This would involve identifying other Department of the Navy or Department of Defense contracts for the repair or construction of aircraft maintenance hangars of comparable size, scope, and complexity, ideally within a similar timeframe. Factors such as geographic location (influencing labor and material costs), specific repair requirements (e.g., structural, electrical, fire suppression systems), and the age and condition of the existing facility would need to be considered. Without access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts, it is difficult to definitively state whether this price represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests the contractor has factored in these variables and assumed the risk.

What specific risks were identified during the pre-award phase that led to the 'exclusion of sources' in the competition?

The designation 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' implies that while the competition was broadly advertised, certain potential bidders were intentionally excluded. The reasons for exclusion are typically based on specific, documented criteria outlined in the solicitation. These could include failure to meet minimum technical qualifications, lack of necessary security clearances, insufficient past performance records, or inability to meet specific bonding requirements. The exclusion aims to ensure that only highly qualified and capable contractors participate, thereby reducing the risk of project delays or failures. However, the specific criteria used for exclusion in this case are not detailed in the provided data and would require reviewing the original solicitation documents.

What is the expected impact of this hangar repair on the operational effectiveness and readiness of the naval aviation units at NAS Kingsville?

The repair of aircraft maintenance hangar 3741 is expected to significantly enhance the operational effectiveness and readiness of naval aviation units at NAS Kingsville. A functional and well-maintained hangar is critical for housing, servicing, and repairing aircraft, protecting them from environmental elements, and providing a controlled environment for maintenance personnel. Improved facilities can lead to faster turnaround times for aircraft maintenance, reduced downtime, and increased safety for both personnel and equipment. This directly contributes to the overall readiness posture of the squadrons based at Kingsville, ensuring they can effectively execute their training and operational missions.

How has federal spending on aircraft maintenance hangar construction and repair evolved over the past five years, and where does this contract fit within that trend?

Analyzing federal spending trends on aircraft maintenance hangar construction and repair requires a broader dataset than what is provided. Generally, such spending fluctuates based on military readiness requirements, aging infrastructure, and new aircraft platform introductions. This $26.9 million contract awarded in 2017 represents a specific investment in maintaining critical infrastructure at NAS Kingsville. To understand its place in the broader trend, one would need to examine aggregate spending data for similar projects across the Department of Defense over several fiscal years. This would reveal whether spending in this category has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether this contract is an outlier or representative of typical investment levels.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6945011R0778

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8134 OLD KEENE MILL RD STE 200, SPRINGFIELD, VA, 22152

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,917,411

Exercised Options: $26,917,411

Current Obligation: $26,917,411

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6945015D0612

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline