DoD's $93.5M Naval Aviation Contract Awarded to Maritime Helicopter Support Company LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $93,502,774 ($93.5M)

Contractor: Maritime Helicopter Support Company LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-04-21

End Date: 2011-06-30

Contract Duration: 435 days

Daily Burn Rate: $214.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: NAVAL AVIATION

Place of Performance

Location: OWEGO, TIOGA County, NEW YORK, 13827

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $93.5 million to MARITIME HELICOPTER SUPPORT COMPANY LLC for work described as: NAVAL AVIATION Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $93.5 million for naval aviation support. 2. Limited competition indicated by 'NOT COMPETED' status. 3. Potential risk associated with sole-source or limited competition awards. 4. Contract falls under the Defense sector, specifically related to aviation support.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $93.5 million is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed, suggesting a limited competition approach. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition could lead to inflated prices, impacting taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying more than necessary due to the absence of competitive bidding. The effectiveness of naval aviation support could be impacted if the chosen vendor is not the most cost-efficient. Transparency in government spending is reduced when contracts are not openly competed.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpricing
Limited transparency

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to a specific company for specialized support

Sector Analysis

This contract is within the Defense sector, specifically supporting naval aviation. Spending benchmarks for similar aviation support services are difficult to ascertain without competitive data.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial for non-competed contracts to ensure fair pricing and effective service delivery. The Defense Contract Management Agency's role is key here.

Related Government Programs

Office Machinery Manufacturing
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competitive bidding
Potential for cost overruns
Limited transparency in award process
No clear justification for sole-source award provided

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $93.5 million to MARITIME HELICOPTER SUPPORT COMPANY LLC. NAVAL AVIATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MARITIME HELICOPTER SUPPORT COMPANY LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $93.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-04-21. End: 2011-06-30.

What was the justification for not competing this $93.5 million contract?

The justification for not competing this $93.5 million contract is not provided in the data. Typically, non-competitive awards are made when only one source can provide the required goods or services, or in cases of urgent need. Further investigation into the contract's specific circumstances would be required to understand the rationale.

What is the risk of awarding a large contract without competition?

The primary risk of awarding a large contract without competition is the potential for inflated pricing and reduced value for taxpayer money. Without the pressure of competing bids, contractors may not be incentivized to offer their best prices. Additionally, it can limit innovation and the opportunity for other capable vendors to demonstrate their services.

How can the effectiveness of this contract be assessed without competitive benchmarks?

Assessing the effectiveness of this contract without competitive benchmarks relies heavily on performance metrics and deliverables outlined in the contract itself. The Department of Defense would need to rigorously monitor the contractor's performance against these specific requirements, ensuring timely delivery, quality of service, and adherence to technical specifications. Post-contract reviews and user feedback are also vital.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing › Office Machinery Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: OFFICE MACH/TEXT PROCESS/VISIB REC

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2510 HUNTER PL STE 201 & 202, WOODBRIDGE, VA, 22192

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $93,502,774

Exercised Options: $93,502,774

Current Obligation: $93,502,774

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0038309D010F

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline