DoD Awards $15.1M Contract for Drafting, Surveying, & Mapping Instruments to L-3 Communications

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,126,986 ($15.1M)

Contractor: L-3 Communications Corp. Space

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-07-19

End Date: 2009-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,077 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200610!003179!2100!W52H09!TACOM ROCK ISLAND !DAAE2003D0150 !A!N! !N!0006 ! !20060719!20091230!124376539!124376539!008898843!N!L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP !450 CLARKE DRIVE !BUDD LAKE !NJ!07828!08620!027!34!BUDD LAKE !MORRIS !NEW JERSEY!+000015126986!N!N!000000000000!6675!DRAFTING, SURVEYING, & MAPPING INSTRUMENTS !A5 !WEAPONS !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !332995!E! !5!A!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!002!B! !A!N!A! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!Y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: BUDD LAKE, MORRIS County, NEW JERSEY, 07828

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.1 million to L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP. SPACE for work described as: 200610!003179!2100!W52H09!TACOM ROCK ISLAND !DAAE2003D0150 !A!N! !N!0006 ! !20060719!20091230!124376539!124376539!008898843!N!L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP !450 CLARKE DRIVE !BUDD LAKE !NJ!07828!08620!027!34!BUDD LAKE !MORR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for specialized instruments used in military operations. 2. L-3 Communications Corp. is the prime contractor for this $15.1M award. 3. The contract falls under the 'Other Ordnance and Accessories Manufacturing' NAICS code. 4. Potential risks include reliance on a single supplier for critical equipment.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $15.1M for a 3-year period seems reasonable for specialized drafting, surveying, and mapping instruments. Benchmarking against similar DoD contracts for precision equipment would provide a clearer assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method is generally expected to yield fair market prices.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for necessary defense equipment.

Public Impact

Ensures availability of critical equipment for military planning and operations. Supports a key defense contractor, potentially impacting jobs in the sector. Funds are allocated to a specific manufacturing segment within the defense industrial base.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for obsolescence of technology over the contract duration.
  • Dependence on L-3 Communications for specialized manufacturing capabilities.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Supports critical military operational needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract is within the defense sector, specifically related to manufacturing of ordnance and accessories. Spending benchmarks for similar specialized equipment can vary widely based on technological sophistication and quantity.

Small Business Impact

No specific information is provided regarding small business participation in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating oversight by a major military branch. Accountability for delivery and performance would be managed through standard DoD procurement procedures.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Ordnance and Accessories Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for technological obsolescence
  • Dependence on a single contractor for specialized equipment
  • Limited insight into specific performance metrics and quality assurance
  • Long-term sustainment and upgrade strategy not detailed

Tags

other-ordnance-and-accessories-manufactu, department-of-defense, nj, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.1 million to L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP. SPACE. 200610!003179!2100!W52H09!TACOM ROCK ISLAND !DAAE2003D0150 !A!N! !N!0006 ! !20060719!20091230!124376539!124376539!008898843!N!L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP !450 CLARKE DRIVE !BUDD LAKE !NJ!07828!08620!027!34!BUDD LAKE !MORRIS !NEW JERSEY!+000015126986!N!N!000000000000!6675!DRAFTING, SURVEYING, & MAPPING INSTRUMENTS !A5 !WEAPONS !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !332995!E! !5!A!S! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP. SPACE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-07-19. End: 2009-06-30.

What is the specific technological advancement or capability this contract aims to procure?

The contract specifies 'Drafting, Surveying, & Mapping Instruments' under NAICS code 332995. While the exact technological specifications are not detailed in this summary, these instruments are crucial for military operations, likely involving precision measurement, geospatial data collection, and battlefield visualization. Understanding the specific requirements would clarify the value proposition.

What are the potential risks associated with the long-term sustainment and upgrade of these instruments?

The primary risks involve technological obsolescence and the contractor's ability to provide ongoing support. If the instruments rely on rapidly evolving technologies, they could become outdated quickly. Dependence on L-3 Communications for sustainment and potential upgrades also poses a risk if the company's capabilities or strategic focus shifts, potentially impacting the DoD's long-term operational readiness.

How does the performance of L-3 Communications on similar contracts influence the assessment of this award's effectiveness?

Assessing the effectiveness of this award requires examining L-3 Communications' past performance on comparable defense contracts. A track record of timely delivery, adherence to quality standards, and successful technological integration would indicate a higher likelihood of effectiveness. Conversely, any history of delays, cost overruns, or performance issues would raise concerns about the successful execution of this contract.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingOther Ordnance and Accessories Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: INSTRUMENTS AND LABORATORY EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 450 CLARK DRIVE, BUDD LAKE, NJ, 07

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAE2003D0150

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-07-19

Current End Date: 2009-06-30

Potential End Date: 2009-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-03-12

More Contracts from L-3 Communications Corp. Space

View all L-3 Communications Corp. Space federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending