DOT awards $2.1M for professional capacity building, with Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. as prime

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,093,734 ($2.1M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2017-06-07

End Date: 2020-06-06

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF ITS PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING (PCB) PROGRAM SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $2.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF ITS PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING (PCB) PROGRAM SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the duration and scope of services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. No immediate risk indicators are apparent from the provided data. 4. Services support the Federal Highway Administration's capacity building efforts. 5. This contract falls within professional, scientific, and technical services. 6. The firm fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $2.1 million over three years for professional capacity building services seems aligned with market rates for similar support. Benchmarking against other professional services contracts of comparable scope and duration within the federal government suggests this award is within a reasonable range. The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, indicating good value management.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this requirement. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, full and open competition generally promotes fair market pricing and allows the government to select the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a process that aims to ensure competitive pricing and access to a broad range of qualified contractors, reducing the risk of overpayment.

Public Impact

Federal employees within the Department of Transportation, specifically the Federal Highway Administration, are likely beneficiaries of enhanced professional development and training. The services delivered are expected to improve the capacity and effectiveness of the agency's workforce. The geographic impact is primarily within the agency's operational areas, likely supporting national transportation initiatives. Workforce implications include improved skills and knowledge for federal employees, potentially leading to better program outcomes.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
Contractor has a significant presence in federal contracting.
Services align with agency mission for capacity building.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically NAICS code 541990. This broad category encompasses a wide range of support services for government agencies. The market for such services is highly competitive, with numerous large and small businesses offering specialized expertise. The contract's value is modest within the context of overall federal IT and professional services spending.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited based on this information alone. Further analysis of the contract's performance and Booz Allen Hamilton's subcontracting practices would be needed to fully assess its effect on small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the contracting officer and program managers within the Federal Highway Administration. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle (implied by 'aw' field), oversight might also be influenced by the terms of the parent contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Highway Administration Operations
Department of Transportation Training Programs
Professional Services Contracts
Capacity Building Initiatives

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $2.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. IGF::OT::IGF ITS PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING (PCB) PROGRAM SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Highway Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-06-07. End: 2020-06-06.

What is the track record of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. in delivering similar professional capacity building services to the federal government?

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. is a well-established federal contractor with a extensive history of providing a wide array of professional, scientific, and technical services across numerous government agencies. They have consistently secured large-value contracts related to management consulting, IT support, engineering, and strategic planning. Their experience in capacity building programs is significant, often involving training, organizational development, and process improvement initiatives. While specific performance metrics for this particular contract are not detailed here, their overall track record suggests a strong capability to deliver complex services. Past performance evaluations and contract close-out reports for similar engagements would provide a more granular view of their success in delivering value and meeting objectives.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar professional services contracts awarded by the Department of Transportation or other agencies?

The contract value of approximately $2.1 million over three years, at a firm fixed-price, suggests a benchmark rate. Without specific details on the labor categories, hours, and rates involved, a precise comparison is challenging. However, for professional, scientific, and technical services, this value is moderate. Similar contracts for capacity building, training, or strategic support within agencies like DOT, or even across other departments, would typically fall within a similar range, depending on the complexity and duration. The firm fixed-price nature helps in comparing the overall value proposition rather than just labor rates. A detailed analysis would involve benchmarking against contracts with identical or closely related NAICS codes and service descriptions.

Are there any identified risks associated with this contract, such as contractor performance issues or scope creep?

Based solely on the provided summary data, there are no explicit risk flags indicating contractor performance issues or scope creep. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally mitigates risks associated with sole-sourcing or limited competition. The firm fixed-price type also helps control costs and reduce the risk of budget overruns due to scope changes, provided the scope is well-defined. However, potential risks always exist in service contracts, including the possibility of the contractor not meeting performance standards, unforeseen technical challenges, or shifts in agency priorities that could necessitate scope adjustments. A thorough risk assessment would require reviewing the contract's statement of work, performance metrics, and any available past performance information.

What is the expected effectiveness of the 'ITS PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING (PCB) PROGRAM SUPPORT' in achieving its stated goals?

The effectiveness of the ITS Professional Capacity Building (PCB) Program Support is contingent on the specific objectives outlined in the contract's statement of work and the quality of execution by Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. Generally, such programs aim to enhance the skills, knowledge, and capabilities of personnel involved in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). This can lead to more efficient deployment and management of ITS technologies, improved traffic safety and mobility, and better utilization of federal funds. Success would be measured by metrics such as increased employee proficiency, successful implementation of new skills, improved program outcomes, and positive feedback from participants and stakeholders. The Federal Highway Administration's clear definition of goals and robust performance monitoring are crucial for ensuring the program's effectiveness.

How has federal spending in the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category (NAICS 541990) trended over the past five years?

Federal spending within the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category (NAICS 541990) has generally shown a consistent or increasing trend over the past five years. This broad category captures a diverse range of services that do not fit into more specific professional service categories. Agencies utilize these services for various needs, including specialized research, technical consulting, program support, and other unique professional requirements. Factors influencing this trend include evolving government needs, the complexity of modern challenges requiring specialized expertise, and the government's reliance on external contractors to supplement internal capabilities. Specific year-over-year fluctuations can occur due to budget cycles, agency priorities, and the awarding of large, multi-year contracts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › TRANSPORTATION (OTHER) R&D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,093,734

Exercised Options: $2,093,734

Current Obligation: $2,093,734

Actual Outlays: $531,374

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 4

Total Subaward Amount: $42,693

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DTFH6116D00035

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline