DoD's $86.8M Contract for ADP/Telecom Services Awarded to GSTEK Inc. in 2005

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,596,205 ($15.6M)

Contractor: Gstek, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-03-17

End Date: 2010-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,840 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200512!500609!2100!W91RUS!ACA, FORT HUACHUCA !W91RUS05D0003 !A!N! !Y!0005 ! !20050317!20050930!868850280!868850280!868850280!N!GSTEK INC !1100 MADISON PLZ A !CHESAPEAKE !VA!23320!29125!021!72!FORT BUCHANAN !BAYAMON !* !+000001288384!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !517110!A!A!5!B!M! !A! !20200930!B!C!Y!B! !A!U!J!2!004!K! !C!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! !B!A! !B!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BUCHANAN, BAYAMÓN County, PUERTO RICO, 00934

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.6 million to GSTEK, INC. for work described as: 200512!500609!2100!W91RUS!ACA, FORT HUACHUCA !W91RUS05D0003 !A!N! !Y!0005 ! !20050317!20050930!868850280!868850280!868850280!N!GSTEK INC !1100 MADISON PLZ A !CHESAPEAKE !VA!23320!29125!021!72!FORT BUCHANAN !BAYA… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $86.8 million, was awarded in 2005 for ADP and telecommunication services. 2. GSTEK Inc. secured this contract through full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 3. The contract duration was 1840 days, ending in 2010. 4. The primary sector for this spending is Information Technology. 5. The award was made by the Department of the Army.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $86.8 million for ADP and telecommunication services appears to be within a reasonable range for a multi-year government contract of this nature, though specific benchmarks are unavailable without more detailed service scope.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a competitive process that aimed for broad participation. This method generally supports price discovery and ensures fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process suggests that taxpayers likely received fair value for the services rendered, as multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid.

Public Impact

Ensured continued operation of critical ADP and telecommunication systems for the Department of Defense. Supported military readiness and communication infrastructure. Provided employment opportunities through GSTEK Inc. and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract awarded in 2005, with data from 2005 indicating potential for outdated technology or service needs.
Limited information on specific performance metrics or service quality.
Exclusion of sources in the competition method warrants further review for potential impact on price.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value.
Long-term contract provided stability for service delivery.
Clear identification of the awarding agency (Department of the Army).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically focusing on ADP and telecommunication services. Government spending in this area is substantial, with benchmarks varying widely based on the complexity and scope of services required.

Small Business Impact

The data does not explicitly indicate the extent of small business participation in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, implying oversight from this agency. However, the provided data does not detail specific oversight mechanisms or accountability measures implemented during the contract's lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

Communication Equipment Repair and Maintenance
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Contract awarded over 15 years ago, raising questions about current relevance and technology.
Lack of detailed performance data makes effectiveness assessment difficult.
The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause requires scrutiny to ensure fair competition.
Potential for outdated technology or service scope given the award date.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.6 million to GSTEK, INC.. 200512!500609!2100!W91RUS!ACA, FORT HUACHUCA !W91RUS05D0003 !A!N! !Y!0005 ! !20050317!20050930!868850280!868850280!868850280!N!GSTEK INC !1100 MADISON PLZ A !CHESAPEAKE !VA!23320!29125!021!72!FORT BUCHANAN !BAYAMON !* !+000001288384!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !517110!A!A!5!B!M! !A! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GSTEK, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-03-17. End: 2010-03-31.

What was the specific scope of 'OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES' covered by this contract, and how did it align with the Department of Defense's evolving technological needs at the time?

The contract encompassed a range of ADP and telecommunication services, likely including maintenance, repair, and potentially upgrades for communication equipment. Given the 2005 award date, the services would have been tailored to the technology prevalent then, such as legacy systems and early broadband infrastructure. Aligning with evolving needs would depend on contract flexibility and the contractor's ability to adapt or provide support for emerging technologies within the defined scope.

How did the 'Exclusion of Sources' in the full and open competition process potentially impact the final price and the range of innovative solutions considered?

Excluding specific sources, even within a full and open competition framework, can limit the pool of potential bidders. This might reduce competitive pressure, potentially leading to a higher price than if all possible vendors were included. It could also narrow the range of innovative solutions presented, as the excluded entities might have offered unique approaches or technologies not considered by the remaining bidders.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how effectively did GSTEK Inc. meet them throughout the contract period?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) established for this contract. To assess effectiveness, one would need to review the contract's statement of work and any associated performance management plans. Without this information, it's impossible to determine how well GSTEK Inc. met its obligations regarding service delivery, uptime, response times, or other critical metrics.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Other Services (except Public Administration) › Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance › Communication Equipment Repair and Maintenance

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1100 MADISON PLZ A, CHESAPEAKE, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91RUS05D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline