DoD Awards $12.5M for Infantry Barracks Construction, Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,519,495 ($12.5M)

Contractor: Yuksel-Metag-Tepe-Yenigun-Zafer Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-06-09

End Date: 2010-09-30

Contract Duration: 843 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: INFANTRY BARRACKS TYPE A (5)

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.5 million to YUKSEL-METAG-TEPE-YENIGUN-ZAFER JOINT VENTURE for work described as: INFANTRY BARRACKS TYPE A (5) Key points: 1. Construction project for Infantry Barracks Type A. 2. Awarded to YUKSEL-METAG-TEPE-YENIGUN-ZAFER JOINT VENTURE. 3. Utilized full and open competition, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 4. Sector: Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract was awarded at a firm fixed price, which helps control costs. The duration of 843 days for 3 delivery orders seems reasonable for barracks construction.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad solicitation of potential contractors. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive bidding.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to secure the best value for taxpayers by encouraging multiple bids and potentially lower prices.

Public Impact

Direct impact on military personnel housing and readiness. Supports the construction industry and associated supply chains. Represents federal investment in military infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns in construction projects.
Contractor performance and timely delivery.
Long-term maintenance and operational costs not detailed.

Positive Signals

Clear project scope (Infantry Barracks Type A).
Firm fixed price contract type.
Competitive award process.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector is crucial for infrastructure development and maintenance, with benchmarks varying significantly based on project scale and location.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract management and quality assurance processes within the Army.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Construction project complexity and potential delays.
Contractor's past performance and capacity.
Economic fluctuations impacting material and labor costs.
Scope creep potential.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.5 million to YUKSEL-METAG-TEPE-YENIGUN-ZAFER JOINT VENTURE. INFANTRY BARRACKS TYPE A (5)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YUKSEL-METAG-TEPE-YENIGUN-ZAFER JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-06-09. End: 2010-09-30.

What is the estimated cost per square foot or per barracks unit, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks?

The provided data does not include square footage or unit details, making a direct per-unit cost comparison difficult. The total award of $12.5 million for 5 barracks units suggests a significant investment, but without more specific metrics, benchmarking against industry standards for similar construction projects is challenging.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and what are the penalties for non-performance?

The data does not specify the key performance indicators or penalty clauses within the contract. Typically, for construction projects, KPIs might include adherence to schedule, quality of workmanship, and safety compliance. Penalties would be defined in the contract terms to address deviations from these standards.

How does the firm fixed price structure mitigate risks associated with fluctuating material and labor costs in the construction sector?

A firm fixed price contract shifts the risk of cost overruns primarily to the contractor. While it provides budget certainty for the government, it can lead to higher initial bids as contractors factor in potential cost increases. This structure is effective in mitigating risks related to market volatility for materials and labor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W917PM07R0105

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: NO: 14/A SOGUTOZU CADDESI, ANKARA

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,333,338

Exercised Options: $16,333,338

Current Obligation: $12,519,495

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W917PM07D0017

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline