DoD's $91.8M Construction Machinery Contract Awarded to IAP Worldwide Services, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $91,784,723 ($91.8M)

Contractor: IAP Worldwide Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-03-20

End Date: 2006-06-17

Contract Duration: 454 days

Daily Burn Rate: $202.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 28

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $91.8 million to IAP WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $91.8M for construction machinery. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Potential risk associated with firm fixed-price contract. 4. Sector is Construction Machinery Manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $91.8M for construction machinery appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific details on the machinery procured and the contract duration.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the firm fixed-price nature could lead to cost overruns if initial estimates were inaccurate.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were utilized through a competitive bidding process, aiming for the best value. The final cost reflects the market price for the specified construction machinery.

Public Impact

Ensures availability of essential construction machinery for military operations. Supports the construction machinery manufacturing sector. Potential for cost savings through competitive bidding.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Firm Fixed Price contract risk
  • Lack of specific machinery details for benchmarking

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition
  • Significant contract value

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction Machinery Manufacturing sector, which is vital for infrastructure development and military support operations. Spending benchmarks are highly dependent on the specific types and quantities of machinery.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly awarded this contract, as it was awarded to IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a degree of oversight in the procurement process. However, the firm fixed-price contract warrants monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.

Related Government Programs

  • Construction Machinery Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Firm Fixed Price contract risk
  • Lack of specific machinery details
  • Potential for cost escalation if market conditions change
  • Limited visibility into subcontractor participation

Tags

construction-machinery-manufacturing, department-of-defense, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $91.8 million to IAP WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is IAP WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $91.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-03-20. End: 2006-06-17.

What specific types of construction machinery were procured under this contract, and how do their unit costs compare to industry averages?

The provided data does not specify the exact types of construction machinery. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of the machinery (e.g., excavators, bulldozers, cranes) and their quantities would be necessary. Unit costs would then need to be compared against current market rates for similar equipment, considering factors like new vs. used, manufacturer, and specific features.

What were the primary risks identified during the bidding process for this firm fixed-price contract, and how were they mitigated?

For a firm fixed-price contract of this magnitude, risks likely included potential cost overruns if market prices for materials or labor increased unexpectedly, or if the contractor underestimated project complexity. Mitigation strategies might have involved thorough pre-bid market research, detailed technical specifications, and robust contractor vetting to ensure capacity and experience.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayers in this $91.8M contract?

Full and open competition is generally designed to ensure best value by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. The success in this case depends on the number and quality of bids received, the transparency of the evaluation process, and whether the final award price was demonstrably lower than what might have been achieved through other procurement methods.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAgriculture, Construction, and Mining Machinery ManufacturingConstruction Machinery Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 28

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. (UEI: 014784388)

Address: 413 WESTERN LANE, IRMO, SC, 02

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W916QW04D0011

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-03-20

Current End Date: 2006-06-17

Potential End Date: 2006-06-17 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-04-06

More Contracts from IAP Worldwide Services, Inc

View all IAP Worldwide Services, Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending