DoD's $26.5M Wharf Recapitalization Contract Awarded to CMS Corp/Toltest JV IV Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,502,153 ($26.5M)

Contractor: CMS Corp/Toltest JV IV

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-09-27

End Date: 2016-02-08

Contract Duration: 1,229 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: RM-12-0509 WHARF C-2 RECAPITILIZATION

Place of Performance

Location: JACKSONVILLE, DUVAL County, FLORIDA, 32228

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.5 million to CMS CORP/TOLTEST JV IV for work described as: RM-12-0509 WHARF C-2 RECAPITILIZATION Key points: 1. The Department of the Navy awarded a $26.5 million contract for wharf recapitalization. 2. The contract was awarded using full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 3. The project duration was 1229 days. 4. The contract type was Firm Fixed Price. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction).

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The awarded amount of $26,502,153 appears reasonable for a large-scale construction project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar wharf recapitalization projects would provide a more definitive assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a competitive process was initiated but specific sources were initially excluded. This method can sometimes limit the breadth of competition, potentially impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition generally promotes competitive pricing, which is beneficial for taxpayers. However, the 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further examination to ensure maximum value was achieved.

Public Impact

Naval infrastructure upgrades enhance operational readiness and support for maritime forces. Construction projects create jobs and stimulate economic activity in the local area. The recapitalization ensures the long-term usability and safety of critical port facilities. Investment in aging infrastructure is crucial for national security and defense capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
Firm Fixed Price contracts can shift risk to the contractor, potentially leading to higher initial bids.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Project addresses critical infrastructure needs for the Department of the Navy.
Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically focusing on large-scale infrastructure development. Spending in this sector is often driven by government needs for facilities and infrastructure, with significant variation based on defense and public works priorities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a stated factor in this contract award (sb: false). Further investigation would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were available or utilized.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, implying oversight from this agency. The 'Delivery Order' type suggests it might be part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, which would have its own oversight mechanisms.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources'.
Lack of detail on small business subcontracting.
No explicit mention of performance metrics or evaluation criteria.
The 'delivery order' nature might obscure the full scope and total value if part of a larger IDIQ.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.5 million to CMS CORP/TOLTEST JV IV. RM-12-0509 WHARF C-2 RECAPITILIZATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CMS CORP/TOLTEST JV IV.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-09-27. End: 2016-02-08.

What was the rationale for excluding specific sources in the initial stages of this full and open competition?

The rationale for excluding specific sources in the initial stages of this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' contract is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such exclusions might be based on specific technical requirements, past performance issues, or unique capabilities needed for the project. Understanding this rationale is key to assessing whether the competition was truly optimized for value and fairness.

How did the 'exclusion of sources' impact the final price and overall value achieved for the taxpayer?

The 'exclusion of sources' could potentially limit the number of bidders, which might lead to less aggressive pricing compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition. While the contract was ultimately awarded competitively, the initial exclusion might have reduced the pressure on bidders to offer the absolute lowest price. A detailed cost analysis and comparison with similar projects would be necessary to quantify the precise impact on taxpayer value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness and success of this wharf recapitalization project?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of this wharf recapitalization project. Typically, such projects would be evaluated based on adherence to schedule, budget, quality of construction, structural integrity of the recapitalized wharf, and its ability to meet operational requirements for naval vessels. Post-completion inspections and operational performance reviews would likely form the basis of effectiveness assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N6945008R1292

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 691 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, BARGERSVILLE, IN, 46106

Business Categories: Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,502,153

Exercised Options: $26,502,153

Current Obligation: $26,502,153

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6945010D1271

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline