DoD Navy Awards $22.8M Renovation Contract to Manson-Nan Hawaii JV Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,821,938 ($22.8M)
Contractor: Manson-Nan Hawaii JV
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-09-26
End Date: 2014-06-06
Contract Duration: 984 days
Daily Burn Rate: $23.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: BUILDING 9 RENOVATION
Place of Performance
Location: PEARL HARBOR, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96860
State: Hawaii Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.8 million to MANSON-NAN HAWAII JV for work described as: BUILDING 9 RENOVATION Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Building 9 Renovation, totaling $22.8 million. 2. Manson-Nan Hawaii JV secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. The project falls under 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' (NAICS 237990). 4. This delivery order was issued under a larger contract with 5 total orders. 5. The contract duration was 984 days, ending in June 2014.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $22.8 million for a major renovation project appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to competitive pricing as multiple qualified bidders submit proposals.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition maximizes the potential for obtaining the best value for taxpayer dollars by encouraging a wide range of offers.
Public Impact
Renovation of critical infrastructure (Building 9) ensures continued operational capacity for the Navy. Investment in construction projects supports the local economy through job creation and material sourcing. The project's completion contributes to the modernization and upkeep of military facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in large construction projects.
- Delays in project completion can impact facility availability.
- Contractor performance risk.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm fixed price contract type helps control costs.
- Experienced contractor likely selected.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, which is a significant area of federal spending. Benchmarks for similar renovation projects would typically consider factors like square footage, complexity, and location.
Small Business Impact
While the award was made to Manson-Nan Hawaii JV, it's unclear if this entity is a small business or a joint venture involving small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Delivery orders under larger contracts require oversight to ensure adherence to the original contract terms and fair pricing. The Department of the Navy is responsible for monitoring this project's execution.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Large contract value increases inherent risk.
- Construction projects are susceptible to delays.
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions.
- Contract duration is substantial.
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, hi, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.8 million to MANSON-NAN HAWAII JV. BUILDING 9 RENOVATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MANSON-NAN HAWAII JV.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-09-26. End: 2014-06-06.
What was the specific scope of the Building 9 renovation, and how did it align with the $22.8 million budget?
The provided data does not detail the specific renovation tasks for Building 9. A comprehensive scope would typically include structural repairs, system upgrades (HVAC, electrical, plumbing), interior modifications, and potentially exterior improvements. The $22.8 million budget suggests a substantial undertaking, likely involving significant modernization or repair to ensure the building's long-term functionality and compliance with current standards.
What were the key performance indicators or metrics used to assess the contractor's performance during this delivery order?
Performance metrics for construction contracts typically include adherence to schedule, quality of work, safety compliance, and budget management. For this delivery order, the Department of the Navy would likely have monitored progress against the 984-day schedule, conducted regular site inspections to ensure work quality and safety standards were met, and tracked expenditures against the firm fixed price to prevent cost overruns. Post-completion evaluations would also assess overall project success.
How did the competitive bidding process ensure the best value was achieved for this renovation project?
The 'full and open competition' designation indicates that multiple, qualified contractors were invited to bid, fostering a competitive environment. This process allows the government to compare proposals based on technical merit, past performance, and price. By selecting the offer that represents the best overall value (not necessarily the lowest price), the government aims to secure a high-quality renovation at a fair and reasonable cost, maximizing the return on taxpayer investment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N6247809R4017
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 636 LAUMAKA ST, HONOLULU, HI, 96819
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,821,938
Exercised Options: $22,821,938
Current Obligation: $22,821,938
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6247809D4016
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-09-26
Current End Date: 2014-06-06
Potential End Date: 2014-06-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-08-16
More Contracts from Manson-Nan Hawaii JV
- 1ST Option Period — $17.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)