Army awards $13.3M for hazardous substance removal, with Parsons Infrastructure & Technology as prime contractor
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,279,319 ($13.3M)
Contractor: Parsons Government Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2001-06-06
End Date: 2009-09-30
Contract Duration: 3,038 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200112!001349!2100!CA87 !U.S. ARMY ENGINEER AND SUPPORT !DACA8700D0038 !A!N!*!Y!0005 !20010606!20020621!006908511!006908511!030866545!N!PARSONS INFRASTRUCTURE & TECHN!100 WEST WALNUT STREET !PASADENA !CA!91124!27984!097!48!GAINESVILLE !COOKE !TEXAS !+000000216212!N!N!000000000000!F108!HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE REMOVAL/CLEANUP/DISPOSAL SVCS !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!*!*!5!B!S!C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !D !N!Y!1!001!N!1A!C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!
Place of Performance
Location: GAINESVILLE, COOKE County, TEXAS, 76240
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.3 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200112!001349!2100!CA87 !U.S. ARMY ENGINEER AND SUPPORT !DACA8700D0038 !A!N!*!Y!0005 !20010606!20020621!006908511!006908511!030866545!N!PARSONS INFRASTRUCTURE & TECHN!100 WEST WALNUT STREET !PASADENA !CA!91124!27984!097!48!GAINESVILLE !COOKE… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for hazardous substance removal services, indicating a need for environmental remediation. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The prime contractor, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology, has a track record in engineering and technical services. 4. The contract duration spans over 8 years, from 2001 to 2009, for a significant environmental cleanup effort. 5. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 6. The geographic location of performance is Texas, specifically Cooke County, highlighting regional environmental concerns.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The awarded amount of $13.3 million for hazardous substance removal services over an 8-year period appears reasonable given the scope of environmental cleanup. Benchmarking against similar contracts for hazardous waste disposal and remediation is difficult without more specific details on the nature and volume of the substances. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants careful monitoring to ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent scope creep.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding process designed to achieve competitive pricing. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, driving down prices and ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment in environmental remediation services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army and potentially the local community in Cooke County, Texas, through the cleanup of hazardous substances. The services delivered include hazardous substance removal, cleanup, and disposal, addressing environmental safety and compliance. The geographic impact is concentrated in Gainesville, Cooke County, Texas, where the cleanup activities are performed. The contract supports the environmental mission of the Department of Defense, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to higher costs if not closely managed.
- Long contract duration (over 8 years) may present challenges in adapting to evolving environmental regulations or technologies.
- Specific details on the types and quantities of hazardous substances are not provided, making a precise risk assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
- Prime contractor has experience in infrastructure and technology, relevant to environmental services.
- Contract addresses critical environmental cleanup needs for the Department of Defense.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Environmental Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. The market for hazardous substance removal and remediation is driven by regulatory compliance, infrastructure development, and military base operations. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on environmental incidents, base realignment, and federal cleanup mandates. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific nature and scale of the environmental hazards addressed.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific award, as it was awarded under full and open competition. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless specific subcontracting opportunities arise that are not detailed in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would include performance reviews, adherence to contract terms, and quality control for the hazardous substance removal. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific operational details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Hazardous Waste Management
- Department of Defense Environmental Programs
- Army Corps of Engineers Contracts
- Superfund Site Cleanup
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
- Long contract duration may lead to outdated methods or technologies.
- Lack of specific detail on hazardous substances complicates risk assessment.
- Environmental cleanup sites can present unforeseen challenges and costs.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, hazardous-substance-removal, environmental-services, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, parsons-infrastructure-technology, texas, cooke-county, delivery-order
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.3 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.. 200112!001349!2100!CA87 !U.S. ARMY ENGINEER AND SUPPORT !DACA8700D0038 !A!N!*!Y!0005 !20010606!20020621!006908511!006908511!030866545!N!PARSONS INFRASTRUCTURE & TECHN!100 WEST WALNUT STREET !PASADENA !CA!91124!27984!097!48!GAINESVILLE !COOKE !TEXAS !+000000216212!N!N!000000000000!F108!HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE REMOVAL/CLEANUP/DISPOSAL SVCS !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!*!*!5!B!S!C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A!
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-06-06. End: 2009-09-30.
What is the specific nature and volume of the hazardous substances being removed under this contract?
The provided data does not specify the exact nature or volume of the hazardous substances. The contract description broadly covers 'HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE REMOVAL/CLEANUP/DISPOSAL SVCS.' To provide a more detailed analysis, information regarding the specific contaminants (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological), their concentration levels, and the total quantity requiring remediation would be necessary. This level of detail is crucial for accurately assessing the scope of work, potential risks, and the appropriateness of the contract's value.
How does the $13.3 million contract value compare to similar hazardous substance removal contracts awarded by the DoD?
Comparing the $13.3 million contract value requires access to a broader dataset of similar contracts. Factors influencing cost include the type and toxicity of substances, the volume to be removed, the geographic location, and the duration of the cleanup. Contracts for large-scale environmental remediation at military installations or for complex industrial cleanup can range from millions to hundreds of millions of dollars. Without specific benchmarks for comparable projects in Texas or for similar types of hazardous materials, it is difficult to definitively state if this contract represents a high or low value. However, the 8-year duration suggests a long-term, potentially complex remediation effort.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this hazardous substance removal contract?
The provided data does not detail the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for hazardous substance removal, KPIs would focus on the effectiveness of the cleanup (e.g., meeting regulatory cleanup standards, reduction in contaminant levels), adherence to safety protocols (e.g., incident rates, compliance with environmental health and safety regulations), timeliness of milestones, and proper disposal of hazardous materials according to federal and state regulations. Performance would likely be monitored through regular progress reports, site inspections, and final remediation assessments.
What is the track record of Parsons Infrastructure & Technology in handling similar hazardous substance removal projects?
Parsons Infrastructure & Technology, as part of the broader Parsons Corporation, has a significant history in engineering, construction, and technical services, often including environmental remediation and infrastructure projects. While the specific contract data doesn't detail their past performance on this particular type of work, Parsons has been involved in numerous large-scale government and private sector projects, including environmental management and cleanup. A deeper dive into their project portfolio and client feedback would be needed to fully assess their track record specifically for hazardous substance removal, but their general industry presence suggests capability.
What is the historical spending trend for hazardous substance removal services by the Department of the Army?
The provided data only includes a single contract award. To analyze historical spending trends for hazardous substance removal by the Department of the Army, a comprehensive review of contract data over multiple fiscal years would be required. This would involve identifying all contracts related to environmental remediation, hazardous waste management, and cleanup services awarded by the Army. Analyzing this data would reveal patterns in spending, identify major contractors, and highlight shifts in priorities or funding levels for environmental programs within the Army.
Are there any known environmental risks or controversies associated with the cleanup site in Cooke County, Texas?
The provided contract data does not contain information about specific environmental risks or controversies associated with the cleanup site in Cooke County, Texas. Such information would typically be found in environmental impact statements, regulatory agency records (like the EPA or Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), or local news archives. Identifying the specific site and its history would be necessary to research potential risks, past incidents, community concerns, or regulatory actions related to the hazardous substances being addressed.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Parsons Corporation (UEI: 030866545)
Address: 100 W WALNUT ST, PASADENA, CA, 91124
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DACA8700D0038
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-06-06
Current End Date: 2009-09-30
Potential End Date: 2009-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-26
More Contracts from Parsons Government Services Inc.
- Salt Waste Processing Facility Conceptual Design — $2.3B (Department of Energy)
- THE Contractor Must Furnish ALL Professional, Technical and Support Labor, Material, Supplies, Management Services, Data, and Facilities Required to Accomplish the Work to BE Ordered Under Technical F Igf::ot::igf — $1.5B (Department of Transportation)
- EO14042 Teams-Next Missile Defense Systems Engineering — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Execute an Administrative Continuance of the Task Order, and Transfers the Administration From Region 1 to Fedsim — $612.4M (General Services Administration)
View all Parsons Government Services Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)