Army Awards $9.8M Contract to Booz Allen Hamilton for Electronics & Communication Equipment Demonstration/Validation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,837,534 ($9.8M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-05-24

End Date: 2009-05-15

Contract Duration: 1,452 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 200509!500796!2100!W91CRB!USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!W91CRB04D0018 !A!N! !Y!0004 ! !20050524!20090515!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000000450000!N!N!000000000000!AC64!RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-DEMO/VALID !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090630!B! ! !A! !A!U!U!2!005!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!D!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: COLUMBUS, FRANKLIN County, OHIO, 43201

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $9.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 200509!500796!2100!W91CRB!USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!W91CRB04D0018 !A!N! !Y!0004 ! !20050524!20090515!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-DEMO/VALID services. 2. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. secured the $9.8M contract. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. This contract falls under the 'Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing' NAICS code, which may indicate a misclassification or broad application. 5. The contract duration is over 3 years, with a significant portion of the funding obligated.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value is $9.8M. Without specific benchmarks for RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-DEMO/VALID services, a direct pricing assessment is difficult. However, the duration and scope suggest a moderate investment for the specified research and development activities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were sought through a process designed to achieve reasonable pricing for the services rendered.

Public Impact

Supports Department of Defense research and development initiatives. Contract involves demonstration and validation of electronics and communication equipment. Potential for advancements in military communication technology. Long-term contract duration may indicate ongoing or complex project needs. Award to a large, established contractor like Booz Allen Hamilton.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation (RDTE) for electronics and communication equipment. The associated NAICS code (332992) is typically for Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing, which appears to be a significant mismatch and warrants further investigation into the specific nature of the services procured.

Small Business Impact

The award went to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., a large business. There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army. Oversight would typically involve program managers ensuring deliverables meet R&D objectives and financial controls are maintained, especially given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

small-arms-ammunition-manufacturing, department-of-defense, oh, delivery-order, 1m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $9.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 200509!500796!2100!W91CRB!USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!W91CRB04D0018 !A!N! !Y!0004 ! !20050524!20090515!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000000450000!N!N!000000000000!AC64!RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-DEMO/VALID !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-05-24. End: 2009-05-15.

What is the specific nature of the 'Electronics & Communication Equipment Demonstration/Validation' services being procured under this contract, and why is it associated with the 'Small Arms Ammunitio

The provided data indicates a significant discrepancy between the service description (RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-DEMO/VALID) and the assigned NAICS code (332992 - Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing). This suggests a potential misclassification or a very broad interpretation of the NAICS code's applicability. Further investigation is needed to understand the precise technical requirements and the rationale behind the chosen classification.

What are the key performance indicators and milestones for this demonstration and validation contract, and how will their achievement be measured to ensure effective use of funds?

As a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract for R&D, success hinges on meeting defined technical objectives and milestones within the scope of electronics and communication equipment demonstration and validation. Effective oversight would involve rigorous tracking of progress against these milestones, regular technical reviews, and verification of successful demonstration outcomes to ensure the $9.8M investment yields the intended technological advancements.

Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, what mechanisms are in place to control costs and prevent potential overruns during the contract's execution?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts require robust oversight to manage potential cost escalations. The government would typically implement stringent financial tracking, require detailed reporting of incurred costs, conduct regular audits, and enforce contractual clauses that limit allowable expenses. Clear definition of the fixed fee and adherence to the scope of work are crucial for preventing uncontrolled spending.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingSmall Arms Ammunition Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91CRB04D0018

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-05-24

Current End Date: 2009-05-15

Potential End Date: 2009-05-15 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-02-16

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending