DoD's $20.7M environmental remediation contract awarded to URS Group, Inc. for Shaw AFB, SC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,727,008 ($20.7M)
Contractor: URS Group, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-08-31
End Date: 2020-09-30
Contract Duration: 3,318 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ER MULTI-SITE PBC SHAW AFB SC FY 11 PROJECT #354886
Place of Performance
Location: SHAW AFB, SUMTER County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29152
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $20.7 million to URS GROUP, INC. for work described as: ER MULTI-SITE PBC SHAW AFB SC FY 11 PROJECT #354886 Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the long duration and scope of environmental remediation. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, typical for long-term environmental projects with potential for unforeseen site conditions. 4. Performance context is a multi-site project over 9 years, requiring sustained contractor effort. 5. Sector positioning is within environmental services for defense infrastructure, a critical but specialized area.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total value of $20.7 million over approximately 9 years suggests an average annual spend of around $2.3 million. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale environmental remediation contracts for military bases is challenging without more specific details on the scope of contamination and remediation techniques. However, the firm-fixed-price structure implies that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value if the work was completed efficiently.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited and evaluated. The presence of 3 bids suggests a reasonable level of competition, which generally helps in achieving competitive pricing and selecting the most capable contractor. The specific details of the bidding process and the number of proposals received would provide further insight into the intensity of the competition.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining the best value through competitive bidding and encourages a wider pool of qualified contractors to participate.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the personnel at Shaw Air Force Base, ensuring a safer and compliant environment. Services delivered include environmental remediation across multiple sites, addressing potential contamination issues. The geographic impact is localized to Shaw Air Force Base in South Carolina. Workforce implications include employment for environmental scientists, engineers, technicians, and construction labor involved in remediation activities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep or unforeseen environmental conditions increasing costs beyond initial estimates.
- Long contract duration increases the risk of contractor performance degradation or changes in regulatory requirements.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a critical, long-term environmental service.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract structure shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
- Long-term nature of the contract allows for sustained focus and expertise development for remediation.
Sector Analysis
The environmental remediation sector for government facilities is a significant market driven by regulatory compliance and the need to address historical contamination. This contract fits within the broader environmental consulting and remediation services industry, which includes firms specializing in hazardous waste management, site cleanup, and environmental engineering. Spending in this sector is often influenced by federal mandates and the lifecycle of aging infrastructure.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While URS Group, Inc. is a large business, there may be subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the scope of environmental remediation services. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting goals were established and met.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the requiring activity within the Department of the Army at Shaw Air Force Base. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and compliance checks are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific project details might be less publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Military Base Infrastructure Support
- Hazardous Waste Management
- Department of Defense Contracts
- Superfund Site Remediation
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk.
- Environmental remediation projects are inherently complex and can face unforeseen issues.
Tags
environmental-remediation, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, shaw-air-force-base, south-carolina, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, remediation-services, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $20.7 million to URS GROUP, INC.. ER MULTI-SITE PBC SHAW AFB SC FY 11 PROJECT #354886
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS GROUP, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-08-31. End: 2020-09-30.
What was the specific nature of the environmental contamination addressed under this contract?
The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the environmental contamination. However, typical environmental remediation projects on military bases involve addressing issues such as petroleum spills, solvents, heavy metals, unexploded ordnance, or legacy waste from past operations. The scope of work for URS Group, Inc. likely involved site investigation, risk assessment, development and implementation of cleanup strategies, and long-term monitoring to ensure compliance with environmental regulations like CERCLA (Superfund) and RCRA.
How does the per-unit cost of remediation compare to industry benchmarks for similar projects?
A direct per-unit cost comparison is not feasible with the provided data. 'Per-unit cost' in environmental remediation can be highly variable, depending on the contaminant, the medium (soil, groundwater, air), the remediation technology used, and the volume or area treated. Benchmarking would require detailed technical specifications of the work performed, such as cost per cubic yard of contaminated soil treated or cost per gallon of groundwater remediated, and comparison against established industry cost indices or data from similar government contracts.
What is the track record of URS Group, Inc. in performing large-scale environmental remediation contracts for the federal government?
URS Group, Inc., now part of AECOM, has a substantial track record in performing large-scale environmental remediation and engineering services for federal agencies, including the Department of Defense, Department of Energy, and EPA. They have been involved in numerous complex projects, including Superfund site cleanups, munitions response, and infrastructure support. Their history suggests significant experience in managing large, multi-year contracts with diverse environmental challenges, though specific performance metrics for individual contracts would require deeper investigation.
Were there any significant challenges or disputes encountered during the performance of this contract?
The provided summary data does not contain information regarding specific challenges, disputes, or contract modifications that may have occurred during the performance of this contract. Such details are typically found in contract performance reports, modification histories, or agency-specific contract databases. Long-term environmental remediation projects often face challenges related to unforeseen site conditions, regulatory changes, or contractor performance issues, but without specific records, it's impossible to confirm for this particular contract.
How does the total spending on environmental remediation at Shaw AFB compare to other similar-sized military installations?
Comparing total spending on environmental remediation at Shaw AFB ($20.7 million over 9 years) to other similar-sized military installations requires access to comprehensive historical spending data across multiple bases and agencies. Factors such as the age of the installation, historical industrial activities, local geology, and specific environmental concerns (e.g., presence of PFAS, munitions) significantly influence remediation costs. A broader analysis across the DoD portfolio would be necessary to establish meaningful benchmarks for spending levels.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W9128F09R0028
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)
Address: 12120 SHAMROCK PLZ STE 300, OMAHA, NE, 68154
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $20,942,355
Exercised Options: $20,727,008
Current Obligation: $20,727,008
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9128F10D0020
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-08-31
Current End Date: 2020-09-30
Potential End Date: 2020-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-26
More Contracts from URS Group, Inc.
- Construction of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex, Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, Hawaii — $140.7M (Department of Defense)
- Fixed Price Award FEE Construction - Gmac — $128.0M (Department of Defense)
- Metc Buildings 1 and 2, FT. SAM Houston Texas — $104.8M (Department of Defense)
- Hurricane Michael Repairs Phase 1 — $69.2M (Department of Defense)
- Disposal of Hazardous Waste for Mnc-I Forward Operating Base Support, Iraq — $52.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)