Logistics consulting services contract awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for over $23 million
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,163,981 ($23.2M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-10-12
End Date: 2018-11-19
Contract Duration: 768 days
Daily Burn Rate: $30.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CL,CT::IGF TO AWARD -8 6 MONTH OPTION
Place of Performance
Location: FORT WALTON BEACH, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32547
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.2 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: IGF::CL,CT::IGF TO AWARD -8 6 MONTH OPTION Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can present cost control challenges. 3. The contract duration is 768 days, indicating a medium-term engagement. 4. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a major component of the DoD. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541614 points to management consulting services. 6. The contract was awarded as a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging without more detailed cost breakdowns and performance metrics. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure means that the government reimburses the contractor for allowable costs plus a fixed fee, which can sometimes lead to less incentive for cost efficiency compared to fixed-price contracts. However, CPFF contracts are often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined, allowing for flexibility. Without comparable CPFF contracts for similar logistics consulting services, a definitive value-for-money assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This typically suggests a robust bidding environment. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government. The award as a delivery order implies it was likely competed under a broader IDIQ contract, where multiple vendors might have been pre-qualified.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and improve the quality of services offered.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from enhanced process, physical distribution, and logistics consulting services. These services are intended to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of military logistics operations. The contract's impact is primarily within the defense sector, supporting national security objectives. Workforce implications are likely related to the contractor's personnel providing specialized consulting expertise.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type may lead to less cost control compared to fixed-price contracts.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the full value and impact of the consulting services.
- The duration of the contract (768 days) requires ongoing monitoring to ensure continued relevance and effectiveness.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
- The contract supports critical logistics functions for the Department of the Army.
- Amentum Technology, Inc. is a known entity in the government contracting space, suggesting some level of established capability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. The market for logistics consulting services is substantial, driven by the need for efficiency and optimization in complex supply chains, particularly within government and defense. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for similar consulting services awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies, focusing on the scope of work and contract type.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any small business set-aside provisions for this contract, nor does it specify subcontracting goals for small businesses. As it was awarded under full and open competition, it is possible that small businesses could have participated as prime contractors if they met the qualifications, or as subcontractors to the prime. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated by contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often not publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Logistics Modernization Programs
- Army Supply Chain Management Initiatives
- Federal Management Consulting Services Contracts
- Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires robust oversight.
- Scope definition and potential for change orders could impact final cost.
- Performance metrics not publicly detailed, making value assessment challenging.
Tags
logistics-consulting, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, professional-services, management-consulting, florida, medium-value
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.2 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. IGF::CL,CT::IGF TO AWARD -8 6 MONTH OPTION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-10-12. End: 2018-11-19.
What is the track record of Amentum Technology, Inc. in delivering similar logistics consulting services to the federal government?
Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant history of performing various services for the federal government, including those related to logistics, engineering, and technical support. While specific details on past performance for contracts identical in scope to this one require deeper database analysis, the company's presence as a prime contractor on numerous federal awards suggests a capacity to manage and execute complex projects. Reviewing past performance evaluations and contract histories for Amentum would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and success rates in delivering logistics consulting services, particularly within the Department of Defense.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure compare to other contract types for similar logistics consulting services?
The CPFF structure reimburses the contractor for allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. This contrasts with fixed-price contracts, where the contractor agrees to a set price regardless of actual costs, incentivizing efficiency. For logistics consulting, where the scope might evolve or be difficult to define precisely upfront, CPFF offers flexibility. However, it places a greater burden on the government to monitor costs to prevent overruns. Fixed-price contracts might be more suitable for well-defined projects, potentially offering better value if risks are well-understood. Other types like Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) can offer a middle ground by adjusting the fee based on performance.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?
The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, for logistics consulting services, KPIs might include improvements in delivery times, reduction in inventory costs, enhanced supply chain visibility, successful implementation of new logistics software or processes, and overall cost savings achieved for the client. The effectiveness of the CPFF contract type also relies on the government's ability to monitor and evaluate the contractor's performance against agreed-upon objectives and the reasonableness of incurred costs.
What is the historical spending trend for logistics consulting services within the Department of the Army?
Historical spending on logistics consulting services by the Department of the Army is substantial, reflecting the complexity and critical nature of military supply chains. While precise figures for this specific NAICS code (541614) and contract type require detailed analysis of historical contract databases, the Army consistently invests in optimizing its vast logistical operations. Spending trends are influenced by factors such as geopolitical events, modernization efforts, and evolving operational requirements. Analyzing trends over several fiscal years would reveal patterns in contract awards, average contract values, and the prevalence of different contract types used for logistics support.
Are there any identified risks associated with the contractor or the nature of the services provided?
Risks associated with this contract could stem from the CPFF contract type, which requires diligent government oversight to manage costs effectively. Potential risks also include the contractor's ability to deliver the promised consulting outcomes, especially if the scope of work is broad or subject to change. Contractor performance risks are generally mitigated through pre-award evaluations and ongoing contract management. The nature of logistics consulting involves advising on complex systems, so risks could also relate to the implementation challenges of recommended changes or the security of sensitive logistical data.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
Address: 1020 TITAN CT, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL, 32547
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,163,981
Exercised Options: $23,163,981
Current Obligation: $23,163,981
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W52P1J13D0041
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-10-12
Current End Date: 2018-11-19
Potential End Date: 2018-11-19 12:11:00
Last Modified: 2025-10-31
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)