DoD awards $10.2M IT support contract to Crucial Security, Inc. without competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,255,248 ($10.3M)

Contractor: Crucial Security, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-02-28

End Date: 2008-02-28

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: IT

Official Description: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.3 million to CRUCIAL SECURITY, INC. for work described as: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor, raising questions about competition. 2. Significant spending on IT support services by the Department of the Navy. 3. Potential risk associated with non-competitive awards and price justification. 4. IT sector spending is substantial, but this specific award lacks transparency.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The award amount of $10.2M for one year of IT support is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is fair market value compared to similar contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible value for these IT support services.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for IT support due to the absence of competitive bidding. The Department of the Navy's reliance on a single vendor for critical IT services warrants scrutiny. Lack of transparency in the procurement process hinders public trust and accountability.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award
Lack of price competition
Limited transparency

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to a specific company for IT support

Sector Analysis

The Department of Defense is a major consumer of IT support services. Benchmarks for similar contracts are difficult to establish due to the sole-source nature of this award.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Crucial Security, Inc., and there is no indication that small businesses were involved in subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

The non-competitive nature of this award raises concerns about oversight. Further review is needed to ensure the justification for a sole-source award was adequate.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpricing
Limited transparency in procurement
No clear small business participation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.3 million to CRUCIAL SECURITY, INC.. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CRUCIAL SECURITY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-02-28. End: 2008-02-28.

What was the justification for awarding this IT support contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves situations where only one vendor can provide the required services due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs. Without access to the specific justification documentation, it's impossible to determine the validity of the sole-source determination for this $10.2M IT support contract.

How does the $10.2M contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar IT support services?

Comparing this $10.2M contract value to industry benchmarks is challenging without knowing the specific scope of services, service level agreements, and duration. However, given it was a sole-source award for one year, the absence of competition suggests the price may not have been optimized, potentially exceeding what could have been achieved through a competitive bidding process.

What measures are in place to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of IT support provided by Crucial Security, Inc. under this contract?

Effectiveness and efficiency are typically monitored through performance metrics, service level agreements (SLAs), and regular performance reviews outlined in the contract. For a sole-source award, robust oversight mechanisms are even more critical to ensure the government receives value and that the vendor meets all contractual obligations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: L3harris Technologies, Inc (UEI: 004203337)

Address: 14900 CONFERENCE CENTER DR, CHANTILLY, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,255,248

Exercised Options: $10,255,248

Current Obligation: $10,255,248

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6523606D6856

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline