Navy's $29.2M Sof Sustainment Training Complex contract awarded to DPR Hardin Construction-WGI Joint Venture

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,232,543 ($29.2M)

Contractor: DPR Hardin Construction- WGI Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-08-28

End Date: 2019-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,617 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF P1391 SOF SUSTAINMENT TRAINING COMPLEX

Place of Performance

Location: CAMP LEJEUNE, ONSLOW County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28547

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.2 million to DPR HARDIN CONSTRUCTION- WGI JOINT VENTURE for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF P1391 SOF SUSTAINMENT TRAINING COMPLEX Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type indicates that the contractor assumes the risk for cost overruns. 3. The contract duration of 1617 days (approximately 4.4 years) suggests a medium-term project. 4. The contract was awarded as a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 5. The project is located in North Carolina, potentially bringing economic benefits to the region. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests the primary award was not specifically targeted towards small businesses.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more specific details on the scope of work and comparable projects. The total award amount of $29.2 million over approximately 4.4 years averages to about $6.6 million per year. This figure needs to be assessed against the complexity and specific requirements of a 'Sustainment Training Complex' to determine true value for money. Without data on the number of bids received or the government's cost estimates, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data does not specify the number of bids received, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and innovation. The fact that it was competed fully suggests the agency sought the best value through a broad market solicitation.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, potentially driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely military personnel who will utilize the sustainment training complex. The contract delivers construction services for a critical training facility. The geographic impact is concentrated in North Carolina, where the facility is located. The project likely created temporary construction jobs in the region during its execution.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor performance beyond meeting delivery timelines.
The duration of the contract (over 4 years) could introduce risks related to changing technology or training needs.
Without details on the bidding process, it's hard to confirm if the lowest price technically acceptable or best value was achieved.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
The contract was awarded as a delivery order, implying it aligns with a broader strategic acquisition framework.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector is a significant part of federal spending, encompassing a wide range of projects from infrastructure to specialized facilities. This contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a category that includes the development of facilities for training, operations, and support. Federal spending in this area is often driven by modernization efforts, new operational requirements, or infrastructure upgrades. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale construction projects awarded by the Department of Defense or other agencies for similar types of facilities.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary competition was open to all responsible contractors, including large businesses. While there's no direct indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses, it is common practice for large prime contractors to utilize small businesses for portions of their work on major construction projects. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether subcontracting opportunities were actively pursued and awarded.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to complete the work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected during the contract's lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Training Facilities Construction
Department of Defense Construction Contracts
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if contractor underestimated long-term material/labor costs.
Risk of scope creep if requirements evolve significantly over the contract duration.
Dependence on contractor's financial stability for project completion under FFP.
Need for robust government oversight to ensure quality and adherence to specifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.2 million to DPR HARDIN CONSTRUCTION- WGI JOINT VENTURE. IGF::OT::IGF P1391 SOF SUSTAINMENT TRAINING COMPLEX

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DPR HARDIN CONSTRUCTION- WGI JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-08-28. End: 2019-01-31.

What specific types of training are intended for the Sof Sustainment Training Complex, and how does the facility's design support these needs?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the 'Sof Sustainment Training Complex' or the specific training modalities it is designed to support. 'SOF' typically refers to Special Operations Forces. Sustainment training could encompass a wide range of activities, from technical skills maintenance to operational readiness exercises. The facility's design would likely include classrooms, simulation centers, physical training areas, and potentially specialized environments depending on the SOF unit's mission requirements. Without detailed project specifications or scope of work documents, a precise answer regarding the facility's design and its alignment with training needs cannot be determined from the available data.

How many bids were received for this contract, and what was the range of proposed prices?

The provided data indicates the contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' and lists the number of bids received as 'no': 4. This means four distinct proposals were submitted for consideration. However, the specific proposed prices from each bidder, including the range and the government's estimate, are not detailed in this dataset. To assess the competitiveness and value, further analysis of the bidding process, including the price proposals and the evaluation criteria used by the Department of the Navy, would be necessary.

What is the track record of DPR Hardin Construction-WGI Joint Venture on similar federal construction projects?

DPR Hardin Construction-WGI Joint Venture is the awardee of this contract. DPR Hardin Construction is a known entity in the construction industry, often involved in large-scale projects. WGI is an engineering, design, and construction services firm. A comprehensive assessment of their track record would require examining their past performance on similar federal contracts, particularly those involving military or specialized training facilities. This would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, project completion records, any history of disputes or contract modifications, and their experience with firm-fixed-price contracts of similar magnitude and complexity. Accessing historical contract data and performance reports would be crucial for a thorough evaluation.

How does the $29.2 million cost compare to similar sustainment training facilities constructed for the military?

Comparing the $29.2 million cost requires context regarding the size, scope, and specific functionalities of the Sof Sustainment Training Complex. Sustainment training facilities can vary significantly in complexity, from basic barracks and classrooms to advanced simulation centers and specialized operational environments. Without detailed specifications for this particular project (e.g., square footage, specific technological integrations, environmental controls), a direct cost comparison to other military facilities is difficult. However, for large-scale construction projects, costs can range from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars. This $29.2 million figure appears moderate for a specialized military facility, but its true value depends heavily on the specific deliverables and quality standards required.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for a project of this duration?

Firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts place the cost risk on the contractor. For a project spanning over 1600 days (approximately 4.4 years), potential risks include unforeseen increases in material costs, labor shortages, or changes in regulatory requirements that could significantly impact the contractor's profitability if not adequately accounted for in the initial bid. While FFP provides cost certainty for the government, it can lead to higher initial bid prices to cover contractor contingencies. Conversely, if the contractor significantly underestimates costs or encounters unexpected challenges, they may face financial losses, potentially impacting project quality or leading to disputes. The government's risk is generally lower in terms of cost overruns but higher if the contractor's financial stability is jeopardized.

What is the historical spending trend for similar 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' contracts by the Department of the Navy?

Historical spending trends for 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' by the Department of the Navy are substantial, reflecting the continuous need for facilities to support naval operations, training, and personnel. Analyzing past data from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) would reveal significant annual expenditures in this category. These trends are influenced by factors such as military readiness requirements, infrastructure modernization programs, base realignments, and specific shipbuilding or aviation support needs. Spending can fluctuate based on congressional appropriations and strategic defense priorities. Without access to a detailed historical spending database for this specific NAICS code (236220) and agency, precise trend analysis is not possible, but it is a consistent area of federal contracting.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N4008510R5306

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: DPR Construction, Inc. (UEI: 617801915)

Address: 3301 WINDY RIDGE PKWY STE 400, ATLANTA, GA, 30339

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,232,543

Exercised Options: $29,232,543

Current Obligation: $29,232,543

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008510D5333

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline