Naval Air Warfare Center awards $10.7M contract for program management and support services to BearingPoint, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,694,642 ($10.7M)

Contractor: Bearingpoint, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-12-08

End Date: 2008-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,515 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200408!000052!1700!A8109 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042103A0022 !A!N! !Y!0004 ! !20031208!20041207!019878961!019878961!014097146!N!BEARINGPOINT, INC (FORMERLY K!22454 THREE NOTCH ROAD, 2N!LEXINGTON PARK !MD!20653!46725!037!24!LEXINGTON PARK !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000000320000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541990!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !99990909!C!E!Y!A! !A!U!J!2!001! ! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !B!B!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: LEXINGTON PARK, ST. MARY'S County, MARYLAND, 20653

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.7 million to BEARINGPOINT, INC. for work described as: 200408!000052!1700!A8109 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042103A0022 !A!N! !Y!0004 ! !20031208!20041207!019878961!019878961!014097146!N!BEARINGPOINT, INC (FORMERLY K!22454 THREE NOTCH ROAD, 2N!LEXINGTON PARK !MD!20653!46725!037!24!LEXINGTON PARK !ST. … Key points: 1. Contract awarded for program management and support services, indicating a need for specialized expertise in managing complex defense programs. 2. The contract's duration of over 4 years suggests a long-term requirement for these services. 3. Awarded to BearingPoint, Inc., a company with a track record in government contracting. 4. The fixed-price contract type suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the scope of work. 5. The contract falls under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330), a broad category that can encompass various technical and managerial support functions. 6. The geographic location of the contractor in Lexington Park, MD, is near major naval air facilities, potentially facilitating close collaboration.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.7 million over approximately 4 years and 4 months averages to about $2.4 million per year. This amount for program management and support services is moderate and needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts for the specific services rendered. Without detailed service descriptions, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests a degree of cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided in the data, but full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at competitive prices and encourages a wider pool of contractors to participate.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Naval Air Warfare Center and its associated programs, which receive essential program management and support. Services delivered likely include project planning, execution oversight, resource management, and technical support for naval aviation initiatives. The geographic impact is concentrated around naval air facilities, particularly in Maryland, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for program managers, analysts, and support staff within BearingPoint, Inc.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the scope of work makes it difficult to fully assess if the awarded amount represents optimal value.
The broad NAICS code (541330 - Engineering Services) could encompass a wide range of activities, making direct comparisons challenging without further breakdown.
The contract duration is substantial, requiring ongoing monitoring to ensure continued performance and value.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Contractor is located in close proximity to key naval facilities, potentially enhancing collaboration and responsiveness.
The contract supports critical naval aviation programs, indicating alignment with defense priorities.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a significant segment of the federal contracting market supporting defense and other government agencies. The market for program management and support services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. Benchmarking this contract's value would require comparison against other contracts for similar program management support within the Department of Defense, particularly those focused on aviation systems.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false) and there is no explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited for this specific award, though BearingPoint, Inc. may engage small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Naval Air Warfare Center contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Contracts
Department of Defense Program Management Support
Engineering and Technical Services Contracts
Defense Aviation Support Services

Risk Flags

Scope definition clarity for program management services.
Potential for cost overruns if scope is underestimated.
Need for robust performance monitoring to ensure quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.7 million to BEARINGPOINT, INC.. 200408!000052!1700!A8109 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042103A0022 !A!N! !Y!0004 ! !20031208!20041207!019878961!019878961!014097146!N!BEARINGPOINT, INC (FORMERLY K!22454 THREE NOTCH ROAD, 2N!LEXINGTON PARK !MD!20653!46725!037!24!LEXINGTON PARK !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000000320000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541990!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BEARINGPOINT, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-12-08. End: 2008-01-31.

What specific program management and support services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES' under NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services). While the specific deliverables are not detailed, such contracts typically encompass a range of activities including project planning, scheduling, resource allocation, risk management, technical analysis, documentation, and administrative support for complex defense programs. Given the awardee is BearingPoint, Inc., known for its consulting and technology services, the support likely involved strategic planning, process improvement, and potentially IT-related program support functions critical to naval air warfare initiatives.

How does the awarded amount of $10.7 million compare to similar program management contracts within the Navy?

A direct comparison of the $10.7 million award for program management and support services requires access to a broader dataset of similar Navy contracts, including their scope, duration, and specific services. However, for a contract spanning over four years, this annual value (approximately $2.4 million/year) appears moderate for specialized program management within a large defense organization like the Naval Air Warfare Center. Larger, more complex programs often involve multi-million dollar annual expenditures for program support. Benchmarking would necessitate analyzing contracts with comparable NAICS codes, agencies, and service complexities to determine if this represents a competitive price.

What is BearingPoint, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense?

BearingPoint, Inc. (and its predecessor entities) has a significant history of contracting with the U.S. federal government, including the Department of Defense. Prior to its acquisition and restructuring, BearingPoint held numerous contracts across various agencies. Post-restructuring, its successor entities have continued to pursue and win federal contracts. While this specific award is from 2003-2008, the company's broader experience suggests a capacity to handle complex government projects. A thorough assessment would involve reviewing their recent performance ratings and contract history beyond this specific award.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for program management services?

Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contracts, while offering cost certainty, can introduce risks if the scope of work is not clearly defined or if unforeseen complexities arise. For program management services, a key risk is that the contractor may cut corners on quality or scope to maintain profitability if costs exceed estimates. Conversely, if the scope is underestimated by the government, the contractor may be incentivized to limit deliverables. Effective oversight is crucial to ensure the contractor meets all performance requirements and that the defined scope accurately reflects the program's needs throughout the contract period.

How has spending on Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) by the Department of the Navy evolved over time?

Spending on Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) by the Department of the Navy has generally been substantial and has fluctuated based on defense budgets, modernization efforts, and specific program requirements. This category includes a wide array of services, from design and development to testing and technical support. Historically, the Navy relies heavily on these services to maintain and upgrade its complex platforms, including aircraft, ships, and weapon systems. While this specific contract is from the early 2000s, overall spending in this sector reflects ongoing investment in defense capabilities and technological advancements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 22454 THREE NOTCH ROAD, 2N, LEXINGTON PARK, MD, 05

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,694,642

Exercised Options: $10,694,642

Current Obligation: $10,694,642

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0042103A0022

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline