DoD's $93.7M Contract for Missile Handling Equipment Awarded to Washington Group International

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $93,724,480 ($93.7M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services International, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-09-25

End Date: 2008-04-30

Contract Duration: 2,044 days

Daily Burn Rate: $45.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200212!000754!9700!ZT01 !DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY !DTRA0101D0012 !A!N! !N!0004 !20020925!20080430!007900517!007900517!807644554!N!WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL!MORRISON-KNUDSEN PLAZA !BOISE !ID!83729!* !* !RS!* !* !RUSSIA !+000041902329!N!N!000000000000!1450!GUIDED MISSILE HANDLING & SERVICING EQUIP !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !235940!E! !5!B!S! ! !A!20110906!B! ! !N!Z!A!U!R!2!004!B! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $93.7 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC for work described as: 200212!000754!9700!ZT01 !DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY !DTRA0101D0012 !A!N! !N!0004 !20020925!20080430!007900517!007900517!807644554!N!WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL!MORRISON-KNUDSEN PLAZA !BOISE !ID!83729!* !* !RS!* !* … Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $93.7 million, was awarded to Washington Group International for guided missile handling and servicing equipment. 2. URS Federal Services International, Inc. was a competitor for this contract. 3. The contract carries a risk associated with the 'NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED' nature of the specific equipment or services. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically supporting the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $93.7 million for guided missile handling and servicing equipment appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific details on the equipment and services provided, but the duration of the contract (over 5 years) suggests a significant undertaking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently by fostering a competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

This contract directly supports national defense capabilities by ensuring the proper handling and servicing of guided missile equipment. The award to Washington Group International could have economic implications for the company and its employees, potentially creating or sustaining jobs. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term need for these services within the Department of Defense.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Classification of services/equipment as 'NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED'
Long contract duration (over 5 years) may lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively
Potential for scope creep given the broad description of services

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition
Experienced contractor likely involved (Washington Group International)
Supports critical defense infrastructure

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). Spending in this area is critical for national security, and benchmarks are often tied to specific defense programs and technological advancements.

Small Business Impact

There is no explicit indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms. However, the 'NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED' nature of some aspects warrants careful monitoring.

Related Government Programs

All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Threat Reduction Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for classified or not discernible aspects of the contract
Long contract duration increases risk of cost overruns and scope creep
Reliance on a single awardee for critical equipment handling and servicing
Lack of specific details on the equipment and services provided

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $93.7 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC. 200212!000754!9700!ZT01 !DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY !DTRA0101D0012 !A!N! !N!0004 !20020925!20080430!007900517!007900517!807644554!N!WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL!MORRISON-KNUDSEN PLAZA !BOISE !ID!83729!* !* !RS!* !* !RUSSIA !+000041902329!N!N!000000000000!1450!GUIDED MISSILE HANDLING & SERVICING EQUIP !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !235940!E! !5!B!S! ! !A!20110906!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Threat Reduction Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $93.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-09-25. End: 2008-04-30.

What specific types of guided missile handling and servicing equipment are covered under this contract, and how do these align with current defense needs?

The provided data lacks specificity regarding the exact types of guided missile handling and servicing equipment. The description 'GUIDED MISSILE HANDLING & SERVICING EQUIP' is broad. Understanding the precise nature of this equipment is crucial to assess its relevance to current defense strategies and technological requirements, and to ensure the funds are allocated to the most critical and up-to-date assets.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and risk mitigation strategies in place for this contract, given the potential for classified or not discernible elements?

Given the 'NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED' notation, it is essential that the Defense Threat Reduction Agency has robust KPIs and stringent risk mitigation strategies. These should include clear protocols for handling sensitive information, regular performance reviews, and contingency plans for unforeseen technical or security challenges. The long duration of the contract necessitates proactive management to ensure objectives are met without compromising security or budget.

How does the pricing structure (Cost Plus Award Fee) for this contract ensure cost-effectiveness and incentivize contractor performance?

A Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract allows the contractor to recover allowable costs plus a fee that includes a base amount and a potential award amount based on performance. For this contract, the CPAF structure aims to incentivize Washington Group International to perform efficiently and effectively, particularly in areas critical to missile handling and servicing. The 'award' portion of the fee is contingent on meeting or exceeding specific performance targets, thus aligning contractor incentives with government objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: GUIDED MISSLES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 1500 W 3RD ST. STE 200, CLEVELAND, OH, 44113

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DTRA0101D0012

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline