Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. awarded $44.5M for scientific analysis support to Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,523,066 ($44.5M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2015-09-04

End Date: 2018-10-31

Contract Duration: 1,153 days

Daily Burn Rate: $38.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE LEVEL OF EFFORT

Sector: R&D

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF OMNIBUS III / 03-75 - SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER (NMCPHC)

Place of Performance

Location: JBSA LACKLAND, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78236

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $44.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF OMNIBUS III / 03-75 - SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER (NMCPHC) Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and scope of scientific analysis support. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. Fixed Price Level of Effort contract type aims to control costs while ensuring defined service delivery. 4. The contract supports critical public health functions for the Navy and Marine Corps. 5. Contract duration of over three years indicates a sustained need for these services. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541712 points to R&D in physical, engineering, and life sciences.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $44.5 million over approximately three years for scientific analysis support appears to be within a reasonable range for a large federal contract of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for scientific and technical support services to defense agencies suggests that the overall award amount is competitive. The fixed-price contract type, while potentially limiting flexibility, helps in managing overall expenditure and provides a clear cost structure for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 5 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives services at a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process that drives down costs and ensures the government secures the best value for its investment in scientific analysis support.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center (NMCPHC), receiving essential scientific analysis support. Services delivered include research and development in physical, engineering, and life sciences, crucial for public health initiatives. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of Defense's operational areas, supporting military health and readiness. Workforce implications include the employment of scientists, analysts, and support staff by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector, specifically NAICS code 541712. This sector is vital for advancing scientific knowledge and technological capabilities across various government agencies. Spending in this area often supports national security, public health, and technological innovation. Comparable spending benchmarks for scientific support services to defense entities indicate that this award is substantial but not outside the typical range for complex R&D support.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large contract awarded to a major defense contractor, it is unlikely that significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were mandated or realized, unless specified in the contract details not provided. This suggests a limited direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Navy or Marine Corps. The fixed-price level of effort structure provides some cost control, but performance monitoring is crucial. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, and any specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential issues or audits.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

research-and-development, department-of-defense, navy, marine-corps, public-health, scientific-analysis, booz-allen-hamilton, fixed-price-level-of-effort, full-and-open-competition, texas, large-business

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $44.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. IGF::OT::IGF OMNIBUS III / 03-75 - SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER (NMCPHC)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $44.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-09-04. End: 2018-10-31.

What is the track record of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. in providing scientific analysis support to federal agencies, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. has a long-standing and extensive track record of providing a wide array of professional and technical services to federal agencies, including significant support within the Department of Defense (DoD). Their expertise spans areas such as IT, cybersecurity, management consulting, and scientific and engineering support. For scientific analysis, they have historically engaged in complex research, data analysis, and technical advisory roles for various defense entities, including those focused on health and readiness. Their performance on similar contracts generally involves managing large teams of experts, delivering technical reports, and providing strategic insights. While specific performance metrics for individual contracts are often proprietary or found in internal agency evaluations, their continued success in winning large federal contracts suggests a generally positive performance history and a strong capability to meet complex government requirements.

How does the awarded amount of $44.5 million compare to similar scientific analysis support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense in recent years?

The awarded amount of $44.5 million for scientific analysis support over approximately three years is within the expected range for large-scale federal contracts of this nature. The Department of Defense frequently awards contracts in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars for specialized scientific, engineering, and R&D support services. Contracts supporting public health initiatives, research, and technical analysis for entities like the Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center often require a significant investment due to the specialized expertise and resources needed. Benchmarking against publicly available data for similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541712) and contract types (Fixed Price) awarded to large prime contractors by the DoD suggests that this award represents a substantial but not outlier value, reflecting the scope and duration of the services required.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?

Primary risks for this contract include potential performance issues if the contractor's scientific expertise does not fully align with the NMCPHC's evolving needs, or if key personnel depart. Another risk is the possibility of cost overruns if the 'Level of Effort' is not precisely defined and managed, despite the Fixed Price structure. Scope creep, where requirements expand beyond the initial agreement, is also a common risk. Mitigation strategies likely include rigorous performance monitoring by the government, clear definition and management of the 'Level of Effort,' regular communication between the government and contractor, and potentially performance incentives or penalties outlined in the contract. The use of full and open competition also mitigates the risk of selecting a contractor with insufficient capabilities.

How effective is the 'Fixed Price Level of Effort' contract type in ensuring value for money for this type of scientific analysis support?

The 'Fixed Price Level of Effort' (FPLE) contract type aims to provide value for money by establishing a fixed price for a specified quantity and type of work, or a maximum number of direct labor hours at specified fixed labor rates. For scientific analysis support, this structure offers cost certainty to the government, as the total price is capped. It is effective when the scope of work is well-defined but the exact effort required is uncertain. This prevents the contractor from significantly increasing costs due to unforeseen complexities. However, it can be less effective if the 'level of effort' is underestimated, potentially leading to the contractor being unable to complete the necessary work within the defined parameters, or if it's overestimated, leading to paying for unused effort. Value for money is maximized when the government accurately estimates the required effort and closely monitors performance to ensure the defined level of effort is efficiently utilized.

What are the historical spending patterns for scientific analysis support services by the Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center or similar entities?

Historical spending patterns for scientific analysis support services by entities like the Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center (NMCPHC) typically show consistent investment in R&D and technical support to maintain public health readiness and address emerging health threats. Spending often fluctuates based on specific research priorities, technological advancements, and public health emergencies. Contracts in this domain are usually awarded through competitive processes, with values ranging from moderate to substantial, depending on the complexity and duration. The NMCPHC, as a focal point for Navy and Marine Corps health, would logically require ongoing support for epidemiological studies, environmental health assessments, and biomedical research, leading to recurring contract awards. The $44.5 million award to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. aligns with the expected scale of such sustained support.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W911QY10R0027

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE LEVEL OF EFFORT (B)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $49,998,989

Exercised Options: $49,998,989

Current Obligation: $44,523,066

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 4

Total Subaward Amount: $966,233

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W911QY11D0048

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2015-09-04

Current End Date: 2018-10-31

Potential End Date: 2018-10-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-03-15

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending