Naval Facilities Hawaii Awards $14.4M Construction Contract to Alan Shintani Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,465,014 ($16.5M)

Contractor: Alan Shintani Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-07-27

End Date: 2009-05-01

Contract Duration: 1,374 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 17

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200510!000427!1700!N62478!NAVAL FACILITIES HAWAII !N6274201D1342 !A!N! !N!0003 ! !20050727!20080328!144538295!144538295!144538295!N!ALAN SHINTANI INC !2020B KAHAI ST !HONOLULU !HI!96819!47900!001!15!MAKAPALA !HAWAII !HAWAII !+000013650700!N!N!000000000000!Z111!MAINT/OFFICE BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236210!A!B!5!B!M! !A!D!20060724!B!D! !N!B!A!U!J!2!003!F! !D!N!C! ! !N!A!N!N!A! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!Y!T!N! ! !1700!N68389!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: PEARL HARBOR, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96860

State: Hawaii Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.5 million to ALAN SHINTANI INC for work described as: 200510!000427!1700!N62478!NAVAL FACILITIES HAWAII !N6274201D1342 !A!N! !N!0003 ! !20050727!20080328!144538295!144538295!144538295!N!ALAN SHINTANI INC !2020B KAHAI ST !HONOLULU !HI!96819!47900!001!15!MAKAPALA !HAWA… Key points: 1. The contract is for maintenance and repair of office buildings. 2. The award was made under full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is 1374 days. 4. The sector is Construction, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $14.45 million for a 1374-day duration suggests a daily rate of approximately $10,517. This needs to be benchmarked against similar construction and maintenance contracts for office buildings in Hawaii to assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. However, the specific details of the bidding and award are not provided, making a precise assessment of price competitiveness difficult.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value. The final price relative to market rates will determine the ultimate taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Local businesses in Hawaii had the opportunity to compete for this significant construction contract. The contract supports infrastructure maintenance for naval facilities, ensuring operational readiness. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term commitment to building maintenance services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed cost breakdown for the $14.45M award.
Need to verify if the price reflects market rates for similar construction services in Hawaii.
Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs over the 1374-day duration.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Contract supports essential facility maintenance.
Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Benchmarking against similar construction contracts in Hawaii, particularly those for government facilities, is crucial to assess if the $14.45 million award represents competitive pricing.

Small Business Impact

While the contract was awarded to Alan Shintani Inc., there is no explicit information on subcontracting to small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made by the Department of the Navy. Oversight would typically involve contract management by Naval Facilities personnel to ensure adherence to terms, quality, and budget.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed cost breakdown.
Need for market rate comparison.
Potential for price escalation over contract duration.
Uncertainty regarding small business participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.5 million to ALAN SHINTANI INC. 200510!000427!1700!N62478!NAVAL FACILITIES HAWAII !N6274201D1342 !A!N! !N!0003 ! !20050727!20080328!144538295!144538295!144538295!N!ALAN SHINTANI INC !2020B KAHAI ST !HONOLULU !HI!96819!47900!001!15!MAKAPALA !HAWAII !HAWAII !+000013650700!N!N!000000000000!Z111!MAINT/OFFICE BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236210!A!B!5!B!M! !A!D!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALAN SHINTANI INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-07-27. End: 2009-05-01.

How does the awarded price of $14.45 million compare to the average cost of similar building maintenance contracts in Hawaii over a 1374-day period?

Without specific benchmark data for comparable contracts in Hawaii, it's challenging to definitively assess the value. However, a daily rate of approximately $10,517 for comprehensive maintenance and repair of office buildings suggests a need for thorough comparison against industry standards and regional pricing to ensure it aligns with fair market value.

What are the primary risks associated with a long-term (1374-day) construction contract for office building maintenance?

Key risks include potential for scope creep, material price fluctuations over the contract term, contractor performance issues, and the possibility of unforeseen structural or system failures requiring extensive repairs beyond the initial scope. Effective contract management and contingency planning are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effectively does the 'full and open competition' method ensure optimal value for taxpayer money in this specific contract?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bidders to offer competitive pricing. Its effectiveness here depends on the number and quality of bids received, the clarity of the solicitation, and the evaluation criteria used. Assuming a robust bidding process, it likely yielded a competitive price, but a post-award analysis against market rates is still recommended.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 17

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 2020 B KAHAI STREET, HONOLULU, HI, 01

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,452

Exercised Options: $27,452

Current Obligation: $16,465,014

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6274201D1342

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline