Naval Facilities Engineering Command Awards $10.5M Contract for Engineering Services to NORESCO, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,466,463 ($10.5M)
Contractor: Noresco, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2002-06-28
End Date: 2015-03-31
Contract Duration: 4,659 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200209!113638!1700!C7408 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COM!N4740898D2007 !A!N! !N!0003 !20020628!20150630!021973586!606727402!007915663!N!NORESCO, LLC !ONE RESEARCH DRIVE, SUITE !WESTBOROUGH !MA!01581!58310!111!06!PORT HUENEME NAVAL C!VENTURA !CALIFORNIA!+000000538000!N!N!000000000000!S119!OTHER UTILITIES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!011!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!U! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!
Place of Performance
Location: WESTBOROUGH, WORCESTER County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01581
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.5 million to NORESCO, LLC for work described as: 200209!113638!1700!C7408 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COM!N4740898D2007 !A!N! !N!0003 !20020628!20150630!021973586!606727402!007915663!N!NORESCO, LLC !ONE RESEARCH DRIVE, SUITE !WESTBOROUGH !MA!01581!58310!111!06!PORT HUENEME NAVAL C!VENTU… Key points: 1. The contract value is $10,466,462.99 for engineering services. 2. NORESCO, LLC, based in Westborough, MA, is the awardee. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The period of performance spans from June 28, 2002, to March 31, 2015. 5. This falls under the 'Other Utilities' and 'Engineering Services' categories.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $10.5 million for engineering services over a 13-year period appears reasonable given the duration and scope. However, without specific benchmarks for similar large-scale, long-term naval facility engineering projects, a precise value assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple vendors have the opportunity to bid.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more cost-effective outcome compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.
Public Impact
Supports naval operations by ensuring necessary engineering services for facilities. The long performance period suggests a sustained need for these services. Awarding to a single firm for an extended duration may limit opportunities for newer or smaller firms to compete on this specific contract. The contract's focus on 'Other Utilities' indicates essential infrastructure support.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (13 years) could lead to price escalation or outdated services.
- Lack of specific details on the services provided makes it hard to assess true value.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Contract supports critical naval facilities.
- Firm fixed price contract type provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) and Other Utilities. Spending in this sector is crucial for maintaining government infrastructure, with benchmarks varying widely based on project complexity and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss=false, sb=false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business set-asides were considered or if opportunities were missed.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a standard procurement process. Oversight would focus on performance delivery and adherence to the firm fixed price terms over the long contract duration.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (13 years) poses risks of cost escalation and service obsolescence.
- Lack of specific service details hinders thorough value assessment.
- No small business participation noted.
- Potential for vendor lock-in over an extended period.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, ma, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.5 million to NORESCO, LLC. 200209!113638!1700!C7408 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COM!N4740898D2007 !A!N! !N!0003 !20020628!20150630!021973586!606727402!007915663!N!NORESCO, LLC !ONE RESEARCH DRIVE, SUITE !WESTBOROUGH !MA!01581!58310!111!06!PORT HUENEME NAVAL C!VENTURA !CALIFORNIA!+000000538000!N!N!000000000000!S119!OTHER UTILITIES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORESCO, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-06-28. End: 2015-03-31.
What specific engineering services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Navy's mission?
The provided data classifies the contract under 'Engineering Services' and 'Other Utilities' but lacks specific details on the exact services rendered. To assess value, understanding whether these services involved infrastructure upgrades, maintenance, design, or specialized technical support for naval facilities is crucial. The contribution to the Navy's mission would depend on the criticality of the facilities supported and the impact of the engineering work on operational readiness and efficiency.
Given the 13-year performance period, what mechanisms were in place to manage potential cost increases or service obsolescence?
A 13-year performance period is exceptionally long for an engineering services contract. While the contract type is 'FIRM FIXED PRICE', which offers cost certainty, mechanisms for addressing potential scope creep, unforeseen technological advancements, or significant market price shifts over such a long duration are critical. Without details on contract modifications, review cycles, or performance metrics, it's difficult to ascertain how risks of cost escalation or service obsolescence were mitigated.
How effective was the full and open competition in achieving the best value for the government and taxpayers?
The 'full and open competition' award method is generally considered effective in promoting price discovery and achieving best value. However, the true effectiveness hinges on the specific requirements, the number and quality of bids received, and the evaluation criteria used. While competition is a positive indicator, a definitive assessment of effectiveness would require examining the bid proposals, the government's evaluation process, and comparing the final price against independent cost estimates or market rates for similar services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › UTILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: RTX Corp
Address: 420 BLEVARD OF THE ALLIES, PITTSBURGH, PA, 15219
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N4740898D2007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-06-28
Current End Date: 2015-03-31
Potential End Date: 2015-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-12-09
More Contracts from Noresco, LLC
- - Closely Associated - These Requirements Have Been Developed for VA Visn 11 to PUT Forth Government Identified ECM Projects AT Visn 11 Facilities to Reduce Energy Consumption, Water Consumption and Associated Utility Costs, and Energy-Related Operations and Maintenance Costs — $121.8M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Espc Projects for FCI Fort DIX and FDC Philadelphia — $73.6M (Department of Justice)
- 200311!190367!1700!C7408 !naval Facilities Engineering Com!deam3699ee73680!c!n! !N!N4740803F5272 !20030825!20080825!606727402!606727402!007915663!n!noresco, LLC !ONE Research Drive !westborough !ma!01581!57000!710!51!norfolk !norfolk (city) !virginia !+000003000000!n!n!000000000000!r799!other Management Support Services !S1 !services !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A! !J! !030!A! !C! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! !z!z!a!a!000! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $61.4M (Department of Defense)
- De-Am36-09g0229039/Gs-P-05-14-Ga-0004,GSA National Deep Energy Retrofit (nder), Energy Savings Performance Contract (espc) Task Order, for Region 5, Noresco, LLC, Metcalfe Federal Building, 536 S. Clark Federal Building, U.S. Custom House, Federal Archives&records Center, Everett M. Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, John C. Kluczynski Federal Building, and U.S. Post Office/Loop Station, Chicago, IL — $53.7M (General Services Administration)
- Utility Monitoring Control System — $49.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)