Tyonek Engineering & Agile Manufacturing LLC Awarded $19.15M for PGL Enhancement by Department of Defense

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,152,307 ($19.2M)

Contractor: Tyonek Engineering & Agile Manufacturing LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-09-09

End Date: 2012-09-09

Contract Duration: 366 days

Daily Burn Rate: $52.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: PGL ENHANCEMENT

Place of Performance

Location: WARNER ROBINS, HOUSTON County, GEORGIA, 31093

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.2 million to TYONEK ENGINEERING & AGILE MANUFACTURING LLC for work described as: PGL ENHANCEMENT Key points: 1. Contract value of $19.15M represents a significant investment in specialized manufacturing capabilities. 2. The firm fixed-price contract structure suggests a clear scope of work and defined deliverables. 3. Awarded to TYONEK ENGINEERING & AGILE MANUFACTURING LLC, indicating a focus on established industry players. 4. The contract duration of 366 days points to a project requiring substantial but defined execution time. 5. The 'All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing' NAICS code suggests a niche or specialized product/service. 6. The 'GA' (Georgia) state code indicates the primary performance location, potentially impacting regional economic activity.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $19.15M for PGL ENHANCEMENT appears reasonable given the specialized nature of 'All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing'. Without specific benchmarks for PGL ENHANCEMENT, direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests the government has a clear understanding of costs and has negotiated a price for a defined outcome. Further analysis would require comparing this to similar, albeit likely unique, enhancement projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. With 10 bidders, this suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. A competitive environment generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition with 10 bidders is a positive signal for taxpayers, suggesting that the contract price was likely driven down by market forces rather than being set by a single provider.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely U.S. Special Operations Command, receiving enhanced capabilities through the PGL ENHANCEMENT. The services delivered fall under miscellaneous manufacturing, implying the creation or modification of specialized equipment or systems. Performance is concentrated in Georgia, potentially creating or sustaining jobs and economic activity within that state. The contract supports the defense sector's need for advanced or specialized manufacturing solutions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if 'PGL ENHANCEMENT' is not precisely defined, leading to cost overruns despite fixed-price.
Dependence on a single contractor for a critical enhancement could pose supply chain risks if not managed.
The niche nature of the NAICS code might limit future competition if the technology or requirement evolves significantly.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition with 10 bidders suggests a robust market and competitive pricing.
Award to an established entity (TYONEK ENGINEERING & AGILE MANUFACTURING LLC) implies a degree of confidence in their capabilities.

Sector Analysis

The defense manufacturing sector is characterized by high technological requirements and specialized production capabilities. Contracts like this, falling under 'All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing,' often support niche defense needs that are not covered by broader industrial categories. The market size for such specialized components can be difficult to quantify but is critical for maintaining technological superiority. Benchmarking is challenging due to the unique nature of 'PGL ENHANCEMENT,' but the $19.15M award suggests a significant project within its specific sub-sector.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the awardee, TYONEK ENGINEERING & AGILE MANUFACTURING LLC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data. There is no information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best technical and price solution from the broader market, potentially overlooking opportunities to engage small businesses in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for its procurements. As a firm fixed-price contract, performance and delivery are key accountability measures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Defense Manufacturing Contracts
Special Operations Command Procurement
Miscellaneous Manufacturing Services
Firm Fixed Price Contracts
Full and Open Competition Awards

Risk Flags

Potential for technical complexity in specialized manufacturing.
Dependence on specific contractor capabilities for niche requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.2 million to TYONEK ENGINEERING & AGILE MANUFACTURING LLC. PGL ENHANCEMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TYONEK ENGINEERING & AGILE MANUFACTURING LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-09-09. End: 2012-09-09.

What is the specific nature of 'PGL ENHANCEMENT' and why was it procured?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of 'PGL ENHANCEMENT'. However, given the awarding agency (U.S. Special Operations Command) and the NAICS code (339999 - All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing), it likely refers to the enhancement, modification, or production of specialized equipment, systems, or components critical for special operations. These enhancements could range from improving the functionality, durability, or stealth capabilities of existing gear to developing entirely new bespoke solutions. The procurement rationale would stem from a identified operational need or technological gap within special operations forces that requires unique manufacturing expertise.

How does the $19.15M contract value compare to similar 'miscellaneous manufacturing' contracts for defense applications?

Direct comparison of the $19.15M contract value for 'PGL ENHANCEMENT' to similar 'miscellaneous manufacturing' contracts is difficult without more specific details on the nature of the enhancement and the products involved. The NAICS code 339999 is broad, encompassing a wide array of manufactured goods. However, for specialized defense applications requiring unique engineering and manufacturing, contract values in the multi-million dollar range are not uncommon. The fact that it was competed fully and attracted 10 bidders suggests that $19.15M was perceived as a competitive and appropriate value by the market for the defined scope.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?

While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided summary, under a firm fixed-price contract for manufacturing enhancements, key deliverables would typically include the timely production and delivery of the enhanced PGL systems or components according to specified technical requirements and quality standards. Performance indicators would likely focus on adherence to the production schedule, meeting all contractual specifications (e.g., performance metrics, material quality, integration capabilities), and successful completion of any required testing or validation phases. The government would monitor these aspects closely to ensure the enhancement meets the operational needs of the U.S. Special Operations Command.

What is TYONEK ENGINEERING & AGILE MANUFACTURING LLC's track record with similar defense contracts?

The provided data indicates TYONEK ENGINEERING & AGILE MANUFACTURING LLC was awarded this $19.15M contract. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their past performance on similar defense contracts, particularly those involving specialized manufacturing or enhancements for agencies like U.S. Special Operations Command. Key aspects to review would include their history of on-time delivery, adherence to quality standards, cost performance on previous fixed-price contracts, and any past performance evaluations or disputes. Without access to this broader contract history, it's difficult to definitively assess their specific track record for this type of work.

Are there any identified risks associated with this contract, such as technical challenges or contractor performance issues?

The primary risks associated with this contract, based on the available information, are related to the potential complexity of 'PGL ENHANCEMENT' within the 'All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing' category. Technical challenges could arise if the enhancement involves novel technologies or requires intricate integration. Contractor performance risks, while mitigated by the competitive award, always exist; this includes potential delays, quality issues, or cost overruns if unforeseen problems emerge, although the firm fixed-price structure aims to contain costs. The niche nature of the work might also present a risk if specialized expertise is difficult to replicate or if the supply chain for unique components is fragile.

How has spending on 'Miscellaneous Manufacturing' for defense purposes trended in recent years?

Analyzing spending trends for 'Miscellaneous Manufacturing' (NAICS 339999) within the defense sector requires access to historical contract data over several fiscal years. Generally, defense spending in specialized manufacturing areas can fluctuate based on evolving threats, technological advancements, and specific program requirements. Contracts like this one suggest a continued need for bespoke manufacturing solutions to meet unique operational demands. A trend analysis would involve aggregating data for this NAICS code across various defense agencies to identify patterns of increase or decrease, and to understand the drivers behind such shifts, such as modernization efforts or specific equipment upgrades.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing › All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: H9222210R0031

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: THE Tyonek Native Corporation (UEI: 153808613)

Address: 800 DUKE AVE, WARNER ROBINS, GA, 90

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Manufacturer of Goods, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,152,307

Exercised Options: $19,152,307

Current Obligation: $19,152,307

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: H9222210D1013

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline