DoD's $29.2M PEO C4 Contract with Booz Allen Hamilton Faces Scrutiny for Value and Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $29,257,324 ($29.3M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-09-30
End Date: 2016-04-03
Contract Duration: 2,012 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: PEO C4 & PM IN TRAVEL
Place of Performance
Location: TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH County, FLORIDA, 33621
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $29.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: PEO C4 & PM IN TRAVEL Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton for PEO C4 services represents a significant investment in administrative management and general management consulting. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a robust price discovery process, but the final award type as a delivery order warrants further examination. 3. Potential risks include ensuring continued value for money throughout the contract's duration and assessing the effectiveness of consulting services. 4. The IT sector, particularly within defense agencies like SOCOM, often sees substantial spending on consulting services for complex C4 systems.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $29.2M over its period needs to be benchmarked against similar administrative and management consulting services for defense agencies. Without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data, assessing the true value for money is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which is a positive indicator for price discovery. However, the nature of the award as a delivery order means the specific task orders and their pricing should be reviewed for adherence to competitive principles.
Taxpayer Impact: While competition was utilized, the overall taxpayer impact depends on the efficiency and effectiveness of the consulting services provided and whether they achieved intended cost savings or operational improvements.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may question the necessity and cost-effectiveness of extensive consulting services for defense C4 systems. The long duration of the contract (2010-2016) raises questions about ongoing relevance and potential for outdated solutions. Transparency in how the delivery orders were managed and priced is crucial for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics
- Potential for scope creep in delivery orders
- Limited visibility into task-level pricing
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition
- Firm Fixed Price contract type
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT and professional services sector, specifically focusing on administrative and management consulting for defense C4 systems. Spending in this area is common for large government agencies requiring specialized expertise for complex technological and operational challenges.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the prime contractor is Booz Allen Hamilton, a large business. There is no information provided regarding small business participation or subcontracting goals within this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would involve reviewing the task orders issued under this delivery order contract to ensure they align with the original scope and were competitively priced. Accountability rests with the contracting officers to manage performance and ensure value.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- U.S. Special Operations Command Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics
- Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-managed
- Limited transparency on task-order specific pricing
- Long contract duration may indicate potential for outdated services
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, fl, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $29.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. PEO C4 & PM IN TRAVEL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $29.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-09-30. End: 2016-04-03.
What specific C4 capabilities or improvements did this contract enable for U.S. Special Operations Command, and how were these measured against the $29.2M investment?
The contract focused on administrative management and general management consulting services for PEO C4. Without detailed task orders or performance reports, it's difficult to ascertain the specific capabilities developed or improvements achieved. A thorough review of deliverables and outcome assessments would be necessary to link the investment to tangible advancements in C4 systems for SOCOM.
Given the full and open competition, were there any challenges in ensuring the most cost-effective solutions were consistently chosen across all delivery orders?
While full and open competition is a strong starting point, the effectiveness of price discovery can vary across individual delivery orders. Challenges might arise if task orders were narrowly defined, limiting the pool of potential bidders, or if the evaluation criteria did not sufficiently emphasize cost-effectiveness alongside technical merit. Continuous monitoring of task order pricing against benchmarks is essential.
How effectively did the firm fixed price structure mitigate cost overruns and ensure the government received the intended value for the consulting services rendered?
A firm fixed price (FFP) contract is designed to provide cost certainty to the government and incentivize contractor efficiency. However, its effectiveness hinges on a well-defined scope of work. If the scope was ambiguous or changed significantly, the FFP could lead to contractor claims or reduced service quality if not managed properly. The government's ability to manage scope and performance is key to realizing value under FFP.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: H9222209R0034
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)
Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $30,626,128
Exercised Options: $30,299,128
Current Obligation: $29,257,324
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 10
Total Subaward Amount: $32,740,681
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: H9222210D0016
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-09-30
Current End Date: 2016-04-03
Potential End Date: 2016-04-03 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-10-01
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation (T4NG) Task Order - Benefits Integrated Delivery — $1.4B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (General Services Administration)
- Product and Technology Ecosystem Management Services (ptems)which Includes Product Delivery and Lifecycle Management to Transform VA by Tapping Into Emerging Technologies, Connecting Developers With VA Data, and Making Human Centered Design (HCD) — $1.1B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)