Air Force Awards $22.6M for Buckley AFB Remediation Services Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,644,096 ($22.6M)
Contractor: Rma-Insight, a Joint Venture
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-07-18
End Date: 2020-07-20
Contract Duration: 2,924 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES FOR FRONT RANGE PERFORMANCE-BASED REMEDIATION AT BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE, F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE BASE AND AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS
Place of Performance
Location: CHEYENNE, LARAMIE County, WYOMING, 82001
State: Wyoming Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.6 million to RMA-INSIGHT, A JOINT VENTURE for work described as: STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES FOR FRONT RANGE PERFORMANCE-BASED REMEDIATION AT BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE, F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE BASE AND AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS Key points: 1. The contract focuses on environmental remediation services across multiple Air Force bases. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The total value is $22.6 million over approximately 8 years.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The $22.6 million award over 8 years appears reasonable for environmental remediation services across multiple large installations. Benchmarking against similar large-scale remediation contracts would provide further validation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This suggests that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on pre-qualification criteria, potentially impacting the breadth of competition and price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to secure the best value for taxpayers by encouraging multiple bids and driving down costs.
Public Impact
Environmental cleanup at key Air Force installations ensures compliance and reduces long-term environmental liabilities. The remediation efforts contribute to public health and safety by addressing potential contaminants. Successful completion of this contract supports the operational readiness of critical military infrastructure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen contamination is discovered.
- Contract duration is lengthy, increasing exposure to changing environmental regulations.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Multiple installations included may offer economies of scale.
- Full and open competition generally leads to better pricing.
Sector Analysis
Environmental remediation services are crucial for government agencies managing legacy contamination. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the scale of contamination and regulatory requirements. This contract represents a significant investment in environmental stewardship.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate specific participation or set-asides for small businesses in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's oversight would involve monitoring the contractor's progress, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations, and verifying the effectiveness of remediation activities. The length of the contract necessitates consistent oversight.
Related Government Programs
- Remediation Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions increasing costs.
- Long contract duration may not adapt well to evolving regulations.
- Reliance on specific technologies could be a risk if they prove ineffective.
- Contract awarded to a joint venture, requiring assessment of individual partner capabilities.
Tags
remediation-services, department-of-defense, wy, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.6 million to RMA-INSIGHT, A JOINT VENTURE. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES FOR FRONT RANGE PERFORMANCE-BASED REMEDIATION AT BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE, F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE BASE AND AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RMA-INSIGHT, A JOINT VENTURE.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-07-18. End: 2020-07-20.
What specific remediation technologies are being employed, and how do they compare to industry best practices for cost-effectiveness?
The Statement of Objectives (SOO) likely outlines the performance requirements for remediation but may not detail specific technologies. A review of the awarded contract and any subsequent task orders would be necessary to identify the technologies used. Comparing these to industry best practices would involve assessing their efficiency, environmental impact, and long-term cost-effectiveness against alternative methods.
What is the potential risk associated with the 'exclusion of sources' clause in the competition method?
Excluding sources, even in a full and open competition, can limit the number of potential bidders. If the exclusion criteria were too narrow or not well-justified, it could reduce competition, potentially leading to higher prices or less innovative solutions. It's important to ensure the exclusions were based on legitimate technical or capability requirements.
How will the effectiveness of the remediation be measured and verified to ensure long-term environmental protection?
Effectiveness is typically measured through post-remediation sampling and analysis to confirm contaminant levels are below regulatory standards. Verification involves independent third-party reviews, government oversight, and potentially long-term monitoring plans. The contract should clearly define performance metrics and acceptance criteria for remediation success.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2749 SATURN ST, BREA, CA, 92821
Business Categories: Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,012,897
Exercised Options: $22,644,096
Current Obligation: $22,644,096
Contract Characteristics
Consolidated Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA890309D8578
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-07-18
Current End Date: 2020-07-20
Potential End Date: 2020-07-20 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-17
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)