DoD Awards $32.2M for European District Maintenance and Restoration Activities to SKE GMBH
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,901,720 ($23.9M)
Contractor: SKE Gmbh
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-03-10
End Date: 2008-12-14
Contract Duration: 1,010 days
Daily Burn Rate: $23.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200606!600391!2100!W912GB!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, EUROPE !W912GB04D0035 !A!N! !N!0002 ! !20060310!20070930!322707076!322707076!312828338!N!/SKE GMBH !WURZBURGER STR 9/11 !KARLSTADT !GM! !00000! !GM! ! !GERMANY !+000021384027!N!N!000000000000!Z300!MAINT/RESTORATION ACTIVITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20060609!B! ! !B! !A!U!J!2!004!B! !Z!N!C!B!GM!N!L!U! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.9 million to SKE GMBH for work described as: 200606!600391!2100!W912GB!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, EUROPE !W912GB04D0035 !A!N! !N!0002 ! !20060310!20070930!322707076!322707076!312828338!N!/SKE GMBH !WURZBURGER STR 9/11 !KARLSTADT !GM! !00000! !GM! ! … Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $32.2 million, is for maintenance and restoration activities. 2. Awarded to SKE GMBH, a German company, indicating potential international sourcing. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The sector is Construction, a significant area of federal spending.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $32.2 million for maintenance and restoration activities appears to be within a reasonable range for construction services of this nature. However, without specific details on the scope of work and comparable projects, a precise valuation is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and promotes price discovery. This method suggests that multiple companies had the opportunity to bid, potentially leading to a more competitive price.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through market forces.
Public Impact
Supports U.S. Army operations and infrastructure in Europe. Provides essential maintenance and restoration services for facilities. Contributes to the local economy in Germany through contract work.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Geographic concentration of contractor in Germany may limit future competition for similar domestic projects.
- Fixed-price contract type can shift cost overrun risk to the contractor, but may also lead to higher initial bids.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, maximizing potential for competitive pricing.
- Contract supports critical infrastructure maintenance in a key operational theater.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Construction sector, which is a substantial component of federal spending. Benchmarks for maintenance and restoration activities can vary widely based on location, scope, and specific requirements.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific contract award. The award went to a single entity, SKE GMBH.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the U.S. Army Engineer District, Europe, suggesting oversight by a specialized military construction and engineering command. The fixed-price nature of the contract implies a focus on defined deliverables.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract awarded to a foreign entity.
- Limited detail on specific scope of work.
- Potential for cost overruns despite fixed-price type if scope is not well-defined.
- Lack of small business participation.
Tags
department-of-defense, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.9 million to SKE GMBH. 200606!600391!2100!W912GB!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, EUROPE !W912GB04D0035 !A!N! !N!0002 ! !20060310!20070930!322707076!322707076!312828338!N!/SKE GMBH !WURZBURGER STR 9/11 !KARLSTADT !GM! !00000! !GM! ! !GERMANY !+000021384027!N!N!000000000000!Z300!MAINT/RESTORATION ACTIVITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!200
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SKE GMBH.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-03-10. End: 2008-12-14.
What specific types of maintenance and restoration activities are covered under this contract, and how do they align with the Army's infrastructure needs in Europe?
The contract specifies 'MAINT/RESTORATION ACTIVITIES' but lacks granular detail on the exact scope. These activities are crucial for maintaining operational readiness and the longevity of U.S. Army facilities in the European theater. Understanding the specific tasks, such as structural repairs, utility system upkeep, or environmental remediation, would provide better insight into their alignment with strategic infrastructure priorities.
What was the competitive landscape like for this 'full and open' solicitation, and how did SKE GMBH's proposal stand out?
While awarded under 'full and open competition,' the data does not detail the number of bids received or the evaluation criteria. SKE GMBH's success suggests their proposal met or exceeded the technical requirements and offered a competitive price. Further analysis would require access to the solicitation details and award decision documentation to understand the competitive dynamics.
What is the long-term value proposition of awarding maintenance contracts to international firms like SKE GMBH for U.S. Army infrastructure in Europe?
Awarding contracts to international firms can leverage local expertise and potentially reduce logistical costs for certain services. However, it also raises questions about long-term strategic partnerships, potential security considerations, and the impact on domestic industry capabilities. The value proposition hinges on a balance between cost-effectiveness, operational necessity, and strategic geopolitical considerations.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Gecom (UEI: 763133741)
Address: WURZBURGER STR. 9-11, KARLSTADT
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912GB04D0035
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-03-10
Current End Date: 2008-12-14
Potential End Date: 2008-12-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-26
More Contracts from SKE Gmbh
- Construction Bldgs 3211 & 3208 — $13.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)