Dod's $14M Contract for Onetess Common Player Unit Services Awarded to General Dynamics ONE Source LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,060,994 ($14.1M)
Contractor: General Dynamics ONE Source LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-01-27
End Date: 2010-05-31
Contract Duration: 489 days
Daily Burn Rate: $28.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32826
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.1 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC for work described as: ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the fixed-fee structure, but detailed cost breakdowns are needed for a definitive assessment. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with potential for cost overruns in cost-plus contracts if not closely monitored. 4. Performance context is limited by the lack of specific metrics on the 'ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT' services. 5. This contract falls within the 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing' sector, with a PSC code of 333319.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total award amount was $14,060,994. Without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data for the 'ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT', it is difficult to definitively benchmark the value. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure introduces some risk of cost escalation if not managed diligently by the agency. However, the fixed fee component provides a degree of cost certainty for the contractor's effort.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of multiple bidders, though not explicitly stated in the provided data, is generally expected in such a scenario. This competitive environment should theoretically lead to more favorable pricing and better value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and encouraging innovation among potential bidders.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army, which receives the services related to the ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT. The services delivered are related to 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing', suggesting support or maintenance for specialized equipment. The contract has a geographic impact primarily in Florida (ST, SN), where the contract was managed or performed. Workforce implications are likely related to specialized technical personnel required for the operation or maintenance of the ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes assessing contractor efficiency challenging.
- The specific nature of 'ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT' is not clearly defined, posing a risk of scope creep or misinterpretation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- Fixed fee component provides some cost predictability for the contractor's effort.
- Contract duration of 489 days allows for sustained support.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls under the broad category of industrial machinery manufacturing and services. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 333319 covers 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing,' which includes establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing machinery, equipment, and supplies not elsewhere classified. This sector often involves specialized technical expertise and can include defense-related applications.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications mandated for small businesses through this particular award. The focus was on full and open competition, which may or may not have involved small business prime contractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance clauses and the fixed fee structure. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Procurement Data
- Army Logistics Support Contracts
- Machinery Manufacturing Services
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed properly.
- Lack of specific performance metrics hinders objective evaluation of value.
- Ambiguity in the 'ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT' definition poses scope management risks.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, machinery-manufacturing, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, florida, general-dynamics-one-source-llc, 333319, other-commercial-and-service-industry-machinery-manufacturing
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.1 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC. ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-01-27. End: 2010-05-31.
What is the specific function and purpose of the 'ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT'?
The provided data does not specify the exact function or purpose of the 'ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT'. The NAICS code 333319, 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing,' suggests it relates to specialized machinery. However, without further context or documentation, its role within the Department of Defense's operations remains unclear. This lack of specificity could potentially lead to challenges in performance monitoring and value assessment, as the government may not have a precise understanding of the services being rendered or the equipment being supported.
How does the $14 million award compare to similar contracts for machinery manufacturing services within the DoD?
Benchmarking this $14 million contract requires access to a broader dataset of similar contracts within the 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing' sector, specifically those awarded by the Department of Defense. Without comparable data points, it's difficult to ascertain if this award represents a competitive price or if it falls within the typical spending range for such services. Factors like contract duration (489 days), pricing structure (CPFF), and specific deliverables would need to be aligned for a meaningful comparison. The limited duration suggests a focused scope of work rather than a long-term sustainment contract.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the contractor's performance on this contract?
The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. For a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, performance evaluation typically focuses on adherence to the scope of work, timely delivery of services or products, and effective cost management within the agreed-upon fixed fee for the contractor's effort. The government's contracting officer and technical representatives would be responsible for monitoring these aspects. The absence of publicly available KPIs makes it challenging to independently assess the contractor's success in fulfilling the contract's objectives.
What is the historical spending pattern for the 'ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT' or similar systems within the Department of the Army?
Historical spending data for the 'ONETESS COMMON PLAYER UNIT' is not provided in the given information. To analyze historical spending patterns, one would need to query procurement databases for previous contracts related to this specific unit or similar systems under the Department of the Army or broader Department of Defense. Examining past awards, their values, durations, and contractors could reveal trends in investment, potential cost efficiencies over time, or shifts in technology and support requirements. Without this historical context, it's difficult to assess if the current $14 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of expenditure.
What is the track record of GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC in delivering similar defense-related machinery services?
GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC, as a subsidiary or division of a larger entity like General Dynamics, likely has a substantial track record in defense contracting. However, specific performance data for this particular entity on contracts involving 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing' is not detailed here. A thorough assessment would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any contract disputes or awards, and the breadth of their experience with similar technical requirements. Their general reputation within the defense industrial base suggests capability, but contract-specific performance is key.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing › Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W900KK08R0001
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp
Address: 3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD, FAIRFAX, VA, 22030
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $14,337,948
Exercised Options: $14,337,948
Current Obligation: $14,060,994
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W900KK09D0340
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-01-27
Current End Date: 2010-05-31
Potential End Date: 2010-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-02
More Contracts from General Dynamics ONE Source LLC
- THE Scope of DHS TIP IS to Create a Physically and Logically Diverse and Redundant Campus Infrastructure That Will Support Everything on and Within the Perimeter Fence. Open System Interconnection Reference Model (OSI Reference Model or OSI Model) Layer 1 - Physical Layer and Layer 2 - Data-Link Layer ARE Included in Their Entirety for the Campus. Aspects of Layer 3 - Network Layer ARE Partially Included, AS ARE Higher Layers for On-Site Specialized Systems (E.G., Security, Smart Buildings Applications, and Fire Safety Systems.) — $265.8M (General Services Administration)
- Uscis Tomis — $226.6M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Sets Award — $225.2M (General Services Administration)
- Remote Video Surveillance System Upgrade — $216.5M (Department of Homeland Security)
- IT Unclassified Igf::ot::igf — $178.9M (Department of Defense)
View all General Dynamics ONE Source LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)