DoD Awards $45M for Abrams Tank Upgrades to Allison Transmission Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $45,024,050 ($45.0M)
Contractor: Allison Transmission Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-09-19
End Date: 2011-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,198 days
Daily Burn Rate: $37.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: X1100 SEP 255 UPGRADES IN SUPPORT OF THE ABRAMS TANK.
Place of Performance
Location: INDIANAPOLIS, MARION County, INDIANA, 46222
State: Indiana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $45.0 million to ALLISON TRANSMISSION INC for work described as: X1100 SEP 255 UPGRADES IN SUPPORT OF THE ABRAMS TANK. Key points: 1. Significant investment in Abrams tank modernization highlights ongoing defense priorities. 2. Sole-source award to Allison Transmission Inc. raises questions about competition and potential cost savings. 3. The contract spans over three years, indicating a substantial and long-term need. 4. Focus on vehicle body manufacturing suggests improvements to the tank's physical platform.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $45 million for upgrades is substantial. Without specific benchmarks for Abrams tank upgrades, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing. However, the 'not competed' status suggests potential for higher costs than a competitive process might yield.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive bidding process. The justification for a sole-source award is not provided.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this sole-source award may result in higher taxpayer costs than if the contract had been competitively bid.
Public Impact
Modernization of a key military asset, the Abrams tank, ensuring its continued operational effectiveness. Potential impact on the defense industrial base, specifically in vehicle body manufacturing. Taxpayer funds allocated for defense spending, contributing to national security objectives.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Sole-source award justification unclear
Positive Signals
- Supports critical defense infrastructure
- Long-term upgrade plan
Sector Analysis
This spending falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to armored vehicle manufacturing and upgrades. Defense spending benchmarks are highly variable, but significant investments in major platforms like the Abrams tank are common.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were involved in this contract. The award was made to a single, likely large, entity.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'not competed' status warrants further oversight to ensure the justification for a sole-source award was valid and that the pricing is reasonable. Accountability for taxpayer funds is crucial in such cases.
Related Government Programs
- Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Potential for inflated pricing
- Limited transparency on award justification
- No clear indication of small business participation
Tags
motor-vehicle-body-manufacturing, department-of-defense, in, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $45.0 million to ALLISON TRANSMISSION INC. X1100 SEP 255 UPGRADES IN SUPPORT OF THE ABRAMS TANK.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ALLISON TRANSMISSION INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $45.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-09-19. End: 2011-12-31.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis rather than through full and open competition?
The provided data does not include the justification for the sole-source award. Typically, sole-source contracts are awarded when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services, or in cases of urgent and compelling need. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the validity of the sole-source decision and its impact on value for money.
How does the cost of these specific upgrades compare to similar modernization efforts on the Abrams tank or other heavy armored vehicles?
Benchmarking the cost of these specific upgrades is challenging without detailed technical specifications and a comparison to similar contracts. The $45 million award for 'X1100 SEP 255 UPGRADES' needs to be evaluated against the scope of work and the pricing of other Abrams modernization programs or comparable vehicle upgrades to determine if it represents good value.
What is the expected improvement in the Abrams tank's performance or survivability resulting from these upgrades?
The data indicates upgrades are in support of the Abrams tank, but does not specify the nature of the 'X1100 SEP 255 UPGRADES'. Understanding the technical improvements, such as enhanced armor, power systems, or digital capabilities, is crucial to assessing the effectiveness of this $45 million investment in maintaining the tank's combat readiness and relevance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Body and Trailer Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Allison Transmission Inc. (UEI: 969132880)
Address: ONE ALLISON WAY, INDIANAPOLIS, IN, 46222
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $45,024,050
Exercised Options: $45,024,050
Current Obligation: $45,024,050
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W56HZV08D0159
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-09-19
Current End Date: 2011-12-31
Potential End Date: 2011-12-31 12:12:00
Last Modified: 2018-10-24
More Contracts from Allison Transmission Inc
- Federal Contract — $167.9M (Department of Defense)
- First Order of Abrams Transmissions in Support of CY24 — $97.4M (Department of Defense)
- CY26 (delivery Order Year 3) for Abrams Transmission LTC — $95.1M (Department of Defense)
- Abrams Transmission - Allison Transmission CY 2021 PM Abrams and Ilsc Delivery Order — $91.6M (Department of Defense)
- Delivery Order for Abrams Transmissions — $91.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)