Navy awards $13.3M construction contract for troop housing facilities maintenance and repair

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,329,069 ($13.3M)

Contractor: Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-30

End Date: 2008-07-24

Contract Duration: 1,028 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200512!601996!1700!N62470!NAV FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMA!N6247003D3050 !A!N! !N!0002 ! !20050930!20070123!809013253!809013253!809013253!N!ISLANDS MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,!526 STOCKTON ST !JACKSONVILLE !FL!32204!00000! !CU!* !* !* !+000005977584!N!N!000000000000!Z163!MAINT/TROOP HOUSING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!002!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !B!B!A!A!000!A!B!Y! !N! ! !1725!N60514!0001! !

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.3 million to ISLANDS MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, INC for work described as: 200512!601996!1700!N62470!NAV FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMA!N6247003D3050 !A!N! !N!0002 ! !20050930!20070123!809013253!809013253!809013253!N!ISLANDS MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,!526 STOCKTON ST !JACKSONVILLE !FL!32204!00000! !CU!* !* … Key points: 1. Contract awarded for maintenance and repair of troop housing facilities. 2. Fixed-price contract type suggests predictable costs for the government. 3. Full and open competition indicates a broad range of potential bidders. 4. Contract duration of approximately 34 months allows for sustained support. 5. The award was a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. 6. The contractor has a track record with the Department of the Navy.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.3 million for approximately 34 months of service appears reasonable for construction and maintenance services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for troop housing facilities maintenance and repair would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The fixed-price nature of the contract helps manage cost uncertainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple companies were invited to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters competitive pricing and allows the government to select the most advantageous offer. The open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to better pricing for taxpayers by encouraging a wider pool of contractors to submit bids, driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

Service members residing in troop housing facilities will benefit from improved living conditions. The contract ensures the maintenance and repair of critical infrastructure, supporting military readiness. The geographic impact is likely focused on the Navy installation where the troop housing is located. The contract supports jobs in the construction and facilities maintenance sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the number of bidders limits a full assessment of competition intensity.
The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work, making it difficult to assess the full value proposition.
No information is available on past performance or potential risks associated with the contractor.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract duration suggests a commitment to sustained facility upkeep.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The market for military facility maintenance and construction is substantial, driven by the need to maintain readiness and quality of life for service members. This award represents a portion of the Department of the Navy's broader spending on infrastructure upkeep and modernization.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the contractor, Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc., is likely a larger entity. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans, so the impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear from this data alone.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Navy contracting command. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract structure, with payments tied to performance. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, though detailed performance metrics are not always publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Base Operations Support
Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Defense Housing Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
Reliance on contractor's quality control processes.
Limited insight into specific bidder numbers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.3 million to ISLANDS MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, INC. 200512!601996!1700!N62470!NAV FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMA!N6247003D3050 !A!N! !N!0002 ! !20050930!20070123!809013253!809013253!809013253!N!ISLANDS MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,!526 STOCKTON ST !JACKSONVILLE !FL!32204!00000! !CU!* !* !* !+000005977584!N!N!000000000000!Z163!MAINT/TROOP HOUSING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ISLANDS MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-30. End: 2008-07-24.

What is the track record of Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc. with the Department of Defense?

Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc. has a history of contracts with the Department of the Navy, including this specific award. Further analysis would require examining their complete contract history across all federal agencies to assess their overall performance, past issues, and reliability. A review of contract databases and performance reports (if publicly available) would be necessary to provide a comprehensive understanding of their track record. Without access to detailed performance data or a broader contract history, it's difficult to definitively assess their reliability beyond the existence of this award.

How does the per-unit cost of this contract compare to similar troop housing maintenance contracts?

The provided data does not include specific per-unit cost breakdowns for the services rendered under this contract. The total award value is $13.3 million over approximately 34 months. To compare per-unit costs, we would need detailed line items for specific maintenance tasks (e.g., HVAC repair, plumbing services, electrical work) and the associated quantities or labor hours. Benchmarking would require access to similar contracts for troop housing maintenance, ideally within the same geographic region or with similar facility types, to establish a fair market price for comparable services.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of construction and maintenance contract?

Primary risks for this type of contract include potential cost overruns if the scope of work expands beyond initial estimates (though mitigated by fixed-price), delays in project completion due to unforeseen site conditions or material availability, and quality control issues in the execution of maintenance and repair work. There's also a risk related to contractor performance and adherence to safety standards. For the government, risks include ensuring the contractor meets performance requirements and that the final cost represents good value for the services delivered.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring competitive pricing for construction services?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring competitive pricing for construction services. By allowing any qualified contractor to bid, it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive bids. This broad participation drives down prices as contractors vie for the award. However, the effectiveness is contingent on the clarity of the solicitation, the complexity of the work, and the number of capable contractors in the market. In some specialized construction areas, the number of truly competitive bidders might be limited despite an open solicitation.

What is the historical spending trend for troop housing maintenance and repair by the Department of the Navy?

The provided data only pertains to a single contract award. To analyze historical spending trends for troop housing maintenance and repair by the Department of the Navy, a comprehensive review of contract data over several fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve aggregating spending across all relevant contract vehicles and task orders related to troop housing facilities. Trends could reveal increases or decreases in investment, shifts in contracting strategies (e.g., more fixed-price vs. cost-reimbursement), and the average contract values awarded over time.

What are the implications of a fixed-price contract for managing budget certainty?

A fixed-price contract offers significant budget certainty for the government. Under this type of contract, the contractor agrees to a set price for the specified goods or services, and the government's financial obligation is fixed. This minimizes the risk of cost overruns for the buyer, as any additional costs incurred by the contractor are absorbed by them. This structure is particularly beneficial for projects with well-defined scopes of work, like routine maintenance and repair, where unforeseen cost escalations are less likely. It simplifies budgeting and financial planning for the agency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 524 STOCKTON STREET, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32204

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6247003D3050

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline