DoD's $13.6M Program Management Contract Awarded to ASMS JV, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,672,956 ($16.7M)

Contractor: Advanced Systems Management Solutions JV, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-05-26

End Date: 2008-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,315 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 30

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200508!243982!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0042104D0058 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20050526!20051231!135960446!135960446!135960446!N!ASMS JV, LLC !8300 OLD COURTHOUSE ROAD !VIENNA !VA!22182!46725!037!24!LEXINGTON PARK !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000002314473!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !E! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!030!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!B! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: VIENNA, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22182

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.7 million to ADVANCED SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS JV, LLC for work described as: 200508!243982!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0042104D0058 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20050526!20051231!135960446!135960446!135960446!N!ASMS JV, LLC !8300 OLD COURTHOUSE ROAD !VIENNA !VA!22182!46725!037!24!LEXINGTON PARK !ST. … Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $13,596,044.60, was awarded to ASMS JV, LLC. 2. This award falls under the 'Program Management/Support Services' category. 3. The contract was awarded via full and open competition. 4. The period of performance spans from May 26, 2005, to December 31, 2008.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which allows for flexibility but can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. The total value is substantial for program management services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is expected to yield fair market value, minimizing unnecessary taxpayer expenditure.

Public Impact

Supports critical Naval Air Warfare Center operations. Ensures continuity of program management services. Potential for follow-on work based on performance. Awarded to a joint venture, potentially fostering collaboration.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can incentivize higher spending.
Long performance period could lead to scope creep if not managed.
Limited information on specific deliverables and performance metrics.

Positive Signals

Awarded via full and open competition.
Contract supports essential defense functions.
Established contractor with a track record.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically program management. Benchmarks for similar services vary widely based on scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data does not explicitly indicate if small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was managed by the Naval Air Warfare Center Air Division, indicating oversight from a specific military branch. Accountability would be tied to contract performance metrics.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
Long contract duration.
Potential for undefined scope creep.
Limited public detail on performance metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.7 million to ADVANCED SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS JV, LLC. 200508!243982!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0042104D0058 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20050526!20051231!135960446!135960446!135960446!N!ASMS JV, LLC !8300 OLD COURTHOUSE ROAD !VIENNA !VA!22182!46725!037!24!LEXINGTON PARK !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000002314473!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !E! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADVANCED SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS JV, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-05-26. End: 2008-12-31.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this program management contract, and how was performance measured against them?

The provided data does not detail the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or the methodology used for performance measurement. Typically, program management contracts include metrics related to schedule adherence, budget control, risk mitigation, and quality of deliverables. A thorough review of the contract statement of work and performance reports would be necessary to assess how effectively ASMS JV, LLC met these objectives and ensured value for the government.

What is the risk associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type in terms of potential cost overruns for this program?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type carries a moderate risk of cost overruns. While the fixed fee provides a ceiling for the contractor's profit, the government bears the risk of increased costs. Effective oversight, detailed cost tracking, and robust negotiation are crucial to mitigate this risk. The government must ensure that all costs incurred are reasonable, allocable, and allowable to prevent excessive spending.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value and competitive pricing for these program management services?

The full and open competition process is designed to maximize competition, thereby driving down prices and ensuring the government receives the best value. The fact that this method was chosen suggests that multiple capable vendors were available. The ultimate effectiveness depends on the rigor of the evaluation criteria and the fairness of the selection process. Without access to the proposals and evaluation details, it's presumed that this process yielded competitive pricing.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 30

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2136 DUNN LORING ROAD, SUI, DUNN LORING, MD, 22027

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0042104D0058

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline